\n
<\/p>\n
Two prominent critics of the rejected 2024 Churchill Falls power agreement between Newfoundland and Labrador and Quebec say Newfoundlanders should not judge any revised deal by the headline numbers, but by focusing on the details that will determine how much value the province ultimately captures from its hydro resources. <\/p>\n
Doug May, a retired economics professor at Memorial University in St. John\u2019s, NL, and David Vardy, a former chair of Newfoundland and Labrador\u2019s Public Utilities Board, both formally opposed the 2024 memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the two provinces and have closely followed the negotiations since. <\/p>\n
With a revised agreement potentially coming as early as next week, they say the public should focus on how much electricity Newfoundland and Labrador keeps, whether it gains the right to sell power to other markets and how much of the project\u2019s economic value ultimately stays in the province. <\/p>\n
Reports earlier this week suggested the revised agreement could include substantially more generating capacity than was considered in the original MOU, nearly 1,000 megawatts of guaranteed transmission access through Quebec and federal financing for the proposed hydroelectric developments. <\/p>\n
The details have not been made public and Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Tony Wakeham has said negotiations are continuing. <\/p>\n
May said the rejected agreement should not be used as a benchmark for whatever comes next, comparing it to a student receiving a grade of 30 on an exam, rewriting it and receiving 45. <\/p>\n
\u201cIs that really a better mark?\u201d he said. <\/p>\n
Talks between the two provinces are unfolding less than two months before Quebec\u2019s Oct. 5 election. Quebec Premier Christine Fr\u00e9chette has said the agreement could be jeopardized by a change of government and that she raised the election deadline directly with Wakeham, who has said his province should not be rushed into an agreement. <\/p>\n
The negotiations seek to replace the 2024 MOU, which proposed an early end to the 1969 Churchill Falls contract that gives Hydro-Qu\u00e9bec access to most of the plant\u2019s electricity at about 0.2 cents per kilowatt-hour until 2041. The deal has long been viewed in Newfoundland and Labrador as one of the worst resource deals in the province\u2019s history. <\/p>\n
After becoming premier, Wakeham rejected the agreement after an independent review in May concluded it was not in the province\u2019s best interests. He then reopened negotiations with Quebec and promised a referendum on any new deal. <\/p>\n
May said the most important question is whether the new agreement lets Newfoundland and Labrador keep more of the value created by its water resources. <\/p>\n
\u201cWhat can you get there for the people of Newfoundland and Labrador in terms of the quality of their lives?\u201d he said. \u201cIf you\u2019re going to give something to Quebec \u2026 can you use (it) as leverage to get a better Churchill Falls deal?\u201d <\/p>\n
May said Hydro-Qu\u00e9bec is paying Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corp., which owns the generating station, less than the Quebec government does for the right to use the province\u2019s water to generate electricity at its hydro plants. <\/p>\n
\u201cThe cheapest electricity by far in the hydro portfolio is Churchill Falls,\u201d he said. <\/p>\n
May also said Quebec\u2019s need for Churchill Falls power has increased. Years of low precipitation have left Hydro-Qu\u00e9bec with low reservoir levels, forcing it to buy more electricity from outside the province while cutting back exports. <\/p>\n
In 2025, Hydro-Qu\u00e9bec bought 15.2 terawatt-hours of electricity from outside Quebec at an average price of 7.6 cents per kilowatt-hour, according to its annual report, up from 9.4 terawatt-hours at 3.6 cents a year earlier. <\/p>\n
May said Quebec has been put in \u201ca pretty tough position\u201d over the longer term. <\/p>\n
But Newfoundland and Labrador does not hold all the cards. <\/p>\n
The existing Churchill Falls contract legally continues for another 15 years, giving Hydro-Qu\u00e9bec access to most of the plant\u2019s electricity at extremely low prices. Quebec also controls the transmission system that provides the most direct route from Labrador to lucrative electricity markets in Ontario and the northeastern United States. <\/p>\n
Both May and Vardy said transmission rights will be one of the most important measures of any new agreement. Newfoundland and Labrador may own the resource, they said, but realizing more of its value depends on being able to move electricity through Quebec to sell it to other buyers. <\/p>\n
That\u2019s why reports of guaranteed access to Quebec\u2019s transmission network could prove to be one of the agreement\u2019s most significant changes, Vardy said. If it allows the province to sell electricity directly to third parties, he said that could give the province another source of revenue and a way to determine what its electricity is worth. <\/p>\n
\u201cI would be happy to see wheeling rights to third parties. That would be a big breakthrough,\u201d he said. \u201cWe need to be able to have live actual transactions in order to be able to know whether we\u2019re getting full value in the marketplace.\u201d <\/p>\n
How much electricity Newfoundland and Labrador retains after 2041 will also matter since it could be sold outside the province or used to support mining, mineral processing and other industrial development at home, he said. <\/p>\n
But Vardy said people shouldn\u2019t assume more generating capacity automatically means more electricity. Adding turbines at Churchill Falls can increase the amount of power produced at peak times, he said, but the total amount of electricity the plant generates is still limited by how much water flows through it. <\/p>\n
\u201cWhen I\u2019m told there are so many megawatts, I then need to be told how many terawatts of energy you are going to go with that,\u201d he said. \u201cThere\u2019s only so much water.\u201d <\/p>\n
Vardy is also calling for any new agreement to undergo a public inquiry led by a Supreme Court judge, with independent experts and the ability to test competing claims, before the province holds its promised referendum. <\/p>\n
He said the inquiry should establish a clear benchmark for judging whether the agreement makes the province, as owner of the resource, the \u201cprincipal beneficiary\u201d of its hydroelectric assets. <\/p>\n