\n<\/p>\n
Breadcrumb Trail Links<\/p>\n
Donald Trump has forced a new urgency on the campaign trail and up and down the country to unleash the North\u2019s potential or risk Arctic sovereignty and a northern treasure house of resources<\/p>\n
Published Apr 08, 2025<\/span> \u00a0\u2022\u00a0 Last updated 42\u00a0minutes ago<\/span> \u00a0\u2022\u00a0 16 minute read<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n<\/button><\/p>\n\n\n\n\nYou can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/svg><\/button><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>A section of a glacier is seen from NASA’s Operation IceBridge research aircraft on March 29, 2017 above Ellesmere Island, Canada. <\/span> Photo by Mario Tama<\/span> \/Getty Images<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/header>\n\nArticle content<\/h2>\nBrendan Bell knows what it is like to be ignored. It wasn\u2019t so many months ago that the chief executive of West Kitikmeot Resources Corp., an Inuit-owned company proposing to build a road and deepwater ocean port in the Arctic, was spending a chunk of each day waiting for non-Arctic people to return his phone calls to discuss the project.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cThis road is not a new idea,\u201d he said. \u201cRoads have a long history in the North.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 2<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<\/p>\n\nTHIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY<\/p>\nSubscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.<\/p>\n\nExclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O’Connor, Gabriel Friedman, and others.<\/li>\nDaily content from Financial Times, the world’s leading global business publication.<\/li>\nUnlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.<\/li>\nNational Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.<\/li>\nDaily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\nSUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES<\/p>\nSubscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.<\/p>\n\nExclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O’Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.<\/li>\nDaily content from Financial Times, the world’s leading global business publication.<\/li>\nUnlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.<\/li>\nNational Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.<\/li>\nDaily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\nREGISTER \/ SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES<\/p>\nCreate an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.<\/p>\n\nAccess articles from across Canada with one account.<\/li>\nShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.<\/li>\nEnjoy additional articles per month.<\/li>\nGet email updates from your favourite authors.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\nTHIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.<\/p>\nCreate an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.<\/p>\n\nAccess articles from across Canada with one account<\/li>\nShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments<\/li>\nEnjoy additional articles per month<\/li>\nGet email updates from your favourite authors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/header>\n\n\n\n\n\nSign In or Create an Account<\/h2>\nor<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nDo they ever. Yet that history can be summarized as roads \u2014 and major infrastructure projects of all types \u2014 may get proposed for the Arctic, but they generally don\u2019t get built. No surprise then that Bell had been contending with an utterly non-urgent vibe from other people in relation to the Grays Bay Road and Port Project. That is until recently, when a lot of those same people started calling him back.<\/p>\nGiven all roads lead to Donald Trump lately, it is no mystery why. In launching a trade war against Canada, the United States is no longer a friendly ally, at least at the top, and that is a driving reason behind why the narrative around roads that do not get built in the Arctic has shifted to one that Canada better start building roads, deepwater ports, naval installations, mines, power grids and fibre-optic networks as soon as possible or risk ceding its Arctic sovereignty and a northern treasure house of critical minerals to a foreign power.<\/p>\nSome of that treasure takes the form of gold, which is currently trading at around US$3,000 an ounce. Canadian gold miner Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. believes its Hope Bay property in the Northwest Territories could produce as much as 400,000 ounces per year.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 3<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThe Northwest Territories is peppered with more than 1,200 active mining claims, while Nunavut is believed to be home to up to 30 per cent of Canada\u2019s petroleum reserves and Yukon is ranked as a top 10 region worldwide in terms of its mineral endowment, according to the Fraser Institute\u2019s 2023 annual survey of mining companies. All told, the conversation around what all the untapped northern bounty could be worth begins in the trillions.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre speaks during a rally in Iqaluit last year. Liberal Leader Mark Carney, right, shakes hands with Nunavut Premier P.J. Akeeagok during a meeting in Iqaluit in March. Party leaders are starting to pay more attention to the North as the stakes rise around Canadian sovereignty.<\/span> Photo by Dustin Patar, Sean Kilpatrick<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nEvidence of this newfound sense of urgency to stop talking about the Arctic and start doing things keeps popping up in Nunavut. Liberal Leader Mark Carney, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre and NDP head Jagmeet Singh have all stopped in Iqaluit in recent weeks. Depending upon which party platform you pull from, the politicians have committed to more infrastructure, better collaboration with the Inuit, increased military spending, investing in energy upgrades and adequate housing and boosting Canada\u2019s capability to unleash the North\u2019s economic potential.<\/p>\n\u201cCanadians used to be fond of the old Winston Churchill quote about Americans that they will ultimately do the right thing after trying everything else,\u201d Bell said. \u201cBut as it pertains to the Arctic, Canada has literally tried everything else. We have tried ignoring it. We have tried underinvesting in its communities and in its infrastructure. We have tried letting the Americans be responsible for our continental defence. And, at last, we can see now that it just isn\u2019t sustainable. The mood of the country has changed.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 4<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBeing mightily ticked at Trump and expressing your patriotism by buying Canadian products at the grocery store is a much more straightforward and inexpensive (relatively speaking) way of taking control of your fate than supercharging the economic development of the North. As the old saying goes, you need to start somewhere, but outside of a few mines dotted here and there, developing the North has barely begun at all despite decades of promises to make it happen.<\/p>\nWhether the current generation can drum up the will and the cash to finally dig in and get big, ambitious projects done, ones that drive Arctic and national prosperity while safeguarding Canada from international bullies, could determine the country\u2019s long-term fate.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>The Americans have always understood the Northwest Passage as a security issue, which has meant keeping the Soviets, and now the Russians, away, said Rob Huebert, a political scientist at University of Calgary. With Donald Trump at the helm, that assumption has changed.<\/span> Photo by Larry Wong<\/span> \/Postmedia<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nIf that sounds alarmist, it is worth having a brief chat with Rob Huebert, a political scientist at the University of Calgary, about the Northwest Passage. In the days of yore, this shortcut between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans stoked the imagination of explorers, who would set off in search of an ice-free route and often get stuck in the ice.<\/p>\nNowadays, the passage is navigable for a stretch of time in the summer and fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key. Canada\u2019s position is that the Northwest Passage belongs to Canada. The Americans, to paraphrase, have long claimed the passage as international waters.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 5<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nIn practice, the disagreement between neighbours has been a remarkably polite affair. A U.S. ship has never entered the passage without first informing the Canadians what it is up to. Granted, Americans tell rather than ask for permission, but they also typically request a Canadian icebreaker be somewhere nearby in case they run into any problems with the ice.<\/p>\n\u201cThe Americans have always understood the Northwest Passage as a security issue, which has meant keeping the Soviets, and now the Russians, away,\u201d Huebert said.<\/p>\n\nWe are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North<\/p>\nRob Huebert, political scientist, University of Calgary<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nThe Americans have also historically done the heavy lifting in terms of keeping the Russians away, allowing Canada to blissfully flake out and, until last year, classify the Arctic as an \u201carea of exceptional\u201d peace, despite Russia having an extensive network of military bases and several nuclear-powered icebreakers at its disposal.<\/p>\n\u201cThe Russian threat is clearly understood,\u201d Huebert said. \u201cNow, all of a sudden, you get Trump back and he has shown a willingness to throw his allies under the bus, and he\u2019s also threatening the existence of Canada. We are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North.\u201d<\/p>\nThings are bad, but that could be good for West Kitikmeot\u2019s Grays Bay Road and Port Project. The company has received dribs and drabs of federal funding over the years to conduct road feasibility studies and the like, but there are no bulldozers on the immediate horizon.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 6<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThe proposal to build a 230-kilometre all-weather road in the middle of a mineral-rich area of the central Arctic, one that would tie into ice roads and ultimately connect a proposed deepwater port, featuring a bunch of bells (maintenance sheds) and whistles (an airstrip), to Yellowknife and southern Canada requires some chicken-and-egg-type thinking.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>A polar bear walks along the ice flow in the Franklin Strait in the Northwest Passage. The passage, once impregnable, is now open to ship navigation in the summer and part of the fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key.<\/span> Photo by Jonathan Hayward<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nThe major mineral deposits \u2014 copper, zinc, gold and silver \u2014 do not need to be discovered. Mining companies have been aware of their existence for decades. Bell\u2019s contention is that if you build the main road, branch roads leading to new mines will follow as the economics of developing a mine go from, \u201cWe know the copper is there, but we just can\u2019t get to it,\u201d to, \u201cWe know the copper is there and we now have a way of getting it to market.\u201d<\/p>\nThe proposed deepwater port could also serve a dual purpose. After all, the Canadian navy is going to need somewhere to dock given that the Nanisivik Naval Facility, first announced by prime minister Stephen Harper in 2007 and repeatedly scaled back since then in scope and plagued by construction delays, including a sinking wharf and a lead contractor going bankrupt, as well as rife with boneheaded, impractical design elements, such as unheated fuel tanks, still doesn\u2019t have an opening date.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 7<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWere the Royal Canadian Navy to commit to a long-term lease agreement with West Kitikmeot, the company could take it as proof of future revenue in order to raise capital from the private sector in an arrangement Bell foresees being split 75-25 between public and private.<\/p>\nOn that front, he has been meeting with the Department of National Defence to understand the scope of the navy\u2019s needs. There is progress. Moving forward, a road could include a fibre-optic communications corridor and potentially even a liquefied natural gas pipeline.<\/p>\n\nNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along<\/p>\nBrendan Bell, CEO, West Kitikmeot Resources<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along; they\u2019re going to need something more concrete than that,\u201d he said. \u201cThat\u2019s really the next piece for us to solve.\u201d<\/p>\nOf course, the uncomfortable question is, how much is the road going to cost?<\/p>\nBell hesitates to give a hard number because the number he is working with is a projection based on a study from 2018, but he figures if you start at $1 billion, and throw in another $400 million or so for the port, then you would be on the right track.<\/p>\nBuilding anything in the Arctic is going to involve some sticker shock. Also required is a keen understanding that the ground beneath whatever gets built \u2014 a road, port, school, town or mine \u2014 may melt. Instead of the sort of bedrock structural engineers favour when sinking construction pilings, the Arctic, particularly the western portion, is filled with permafrost, or permanently frozen ground that is now in the process of permanently unfreezing at an alarming rate.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 8<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cWhen we talk about building in the Arctic, foundation designers have to start to consider how much overdesigning we are going to have to do to anticipate what a building will need in 30 years\u2019 time,\u201d Chris Burn, a physical geography professor at Carleton University, said. \u201cIf we build things to today\u2019s code, all is going to be well, it\u2019ll be just fine, but then in 15 years there\u2019s going to be a problem.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Brendan Bell, right, is chief executive of West Kitikmeot Resources Corp., an Inuit-owned company proposing to build a road and deepwater ocean port in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Handout<\/span> \/West Kitikmeot Resources Corp.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nBurn is a Brit and attended a series of lectures on permafrost as an undergraduate in the 1970s. Halfway through the second one, he knew what he wanted to do with his life, and the place to do it, at least for an English-speaking scholar, was the Canadian Arctic.<\/p>\nHe went on to become president of the International Permafrost Association for a time, and he is somewhat of a legend in Canadian Arctic permafrost research circles. He is also the guy that northerners call to consult with on building projects, including the Inuvik-Tuktoyaktuk Highway.<\/p>\nThe 138-kilometre, two-lane, all-weather gravel road tying the community of Tuktoyaktuk on the Arctic coast to the rest of Canada\u2019s road network opened in 2017. The price tag was $300 million and its completion allowed Canada, 150 years post-Confederation, to claim it was connected by road from coast to coast to coast.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 9<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBut beneath the proudly Canadian optics of tethering the country north to south was the chilling reality of building infrastructure in the permafrost zone.<\/p>\n\u201cThe ice in the ground is what holds the permafrost together,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nThink of the ice as the glue. A new, hypothetical four-storey building built to serve an equally new, hypothetical Arctic outpost would typically be built on pilings. Current engineering wisdom allows that once pilings are sunk in the permafrost, a building is effectively frozen in place. But as the permafrost thaws, and the glue unsticks, the building could be on the move: sinking, shifting or toppling over altogether.<\/p>\nRoads are even more dicey. Buildings have small footprints, but future Arctic roads will traverse multiple building environments and the amount of ice-glue in the ground will vary depending on the location, Burn said.<\/p>\nIn a landscape that is humming with, say, mining projects, the ice-glue will need to support the weight of industrial-scale trucks. As long as the glue sticks, all will be well, but should the glue lose its stickiness due to temperature increases, the road would be in big trouble and need substantial repairs while those who travel upon it could be put at grave risk.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 10<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\nWe’re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre<\/p>\nChris Burn, geography professor, Carleton University<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cKnowing the quantity of ice underneath the road is a really critical part of the information needed to design the road because the designers have to decide how they\u2019re going to keep that ice frozen,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nOne bright idea has been to refrigerate the permafrost. The Shakwak corridor is a critical stretch of the Alaska Highway connecting the state, via Yukon and British Columbia, to the lower 48 states. Canada and the U.S. have long co-operated in maintaining the highway, and a big chunk of that job in recent decades has been figuring out what to do about the thawing permafrost causing gargantuan potholes, bumps and cracks, as well as warping guardrails at the highway\u2019s edge.<\/p>\nThe community of Beaver Creek in western Yukon piloted a project involving thermosyphons: picture a white pipe stuck in the ground next to the road that is designed to vent heat from beneath the road while carrying cold back into the permafrost. The gadgets are a relatively low-tech way of addressing thawing permafrost, but low-tech should not be confused with inexpensive.<\/p>\n\u201cBeaver Creek\u2019s thermosyphon project cost $4 million and that was for 400 metres of road, which would work out to about $8 million per kilometre,\u201d Burn said. \u201cWe\u2019re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre. We don\u2019t do that in Canada.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 11<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nOn top of that, road maintenance in areas of thawing permafrost is already six times pricier than maintaining roads in areas where the permafrost \u201cis stable or absent,\u201d according to the Yukon government. Burn said more thawing permafrost is in the cards, so more Arctic architects, road designers, maintenance types and accountants will presumably be puzzling over what to do about it and how to budget for it.<\/p>\nTaken as a whole, a great, imagined Arctic infrastructure build-out might seem a bit daunting, but Canada has not always been afraid of dreaming big. Consider John Diefenbaker\u2019s Northern Vision.<\/p>\nThe country\u2019s so-called Prairie populist prime minister uncorked a barnburner of a speech before a packed house at the Winnipeg Civic Auditorium during a 1958 election campaign that his Conservatives went on to win in a blowout. Diefenbaker, whose oratorical chops were substantial, was never finer nor more fiery that day as he spoke of a \u201cnew\u201d Canada infused with a sense of national purpose and destiny.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, delivers remarks at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa in 2023. Obed said, while the Inuit are the first Canadians, they view themselves as Canadians first.<\/span> Photo by Spencer Colby<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cHow many of you here knew the pioneers in Western Canada?\u201d he said. \u201cI saw the early days here, here in Winnipeg in 1909, when the vast movement was taking place into the Western plains \u2014\u00a0they had imagination. There is a new imagination now. The Arctic.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 12<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThis new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\nIt should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\nIn reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/svg><\/button><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>A section of a glacier is seen from NASA’s Operation IceBridge research aircraft on March 29, 2017 above Ellesmere Island, Canada. <\/span> Photo by Mario Tama<\/span> \/Getty Images<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/header>\n\nArticle content<\/h2>\nBrendan Bell knows what it is like to be ignored. It wasn\u2019t so many months ago that the chief executive of West Kitikmeot Resources Corp., an Inuit-owned company proposing to build a road and deepwater ocean port in the Arctic, was spending a chunk of each day waiting for non-Arctic people to return his phone calls to discuss the project.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cThis road is not a new idea,\u201d he said. \u201cRoads have a long history in the North.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 2<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<\/p>\n\nTHIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY<\/p>\nSubscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.<\/p>\n\nExclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O’Connor, Gabriel Friedman, and others.<\/li>\nDaily content from Financial Times, the world’s leading global business publication.<\/li>\nUnlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.<\/li>\nNational Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.<\/li>\nDaily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\nSUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES<\/p>\nSubscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.<\/p>\n\nExclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O’Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.<\/li>\nDaily content from Financial Times, the world’s leading global business publication.<\/li>\nUnlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.<\/li>\nNational Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.<\/li>\nDaily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\nREGISTER \/ SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES<\/p>\nCreate an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.<\/p>\n\nAccess articles from across Canada with one account.<\/li>\nShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.<\/li>\nEnjoy additional articles per month.<\/li>\nGet email updates from your favourite authors.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\nTHIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.<\/p>\nCreate an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.<\/p>\n\nAccess articles from across Canada with one account<\/li>\nShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments<\/li>\nEnjoy additional articles per month<\/li>\nGet email updates from your favourite authors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/header>\n\n\n\n\n\nSign In or Create an Account<\/h2>\nor<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nDo they ever. Yet that history can be summarized as roads \u2014 and major infrastructure projects of all types \u2014 may get proposed for the Arctic, but they generally don\u2019t get built. No surprise then that Bell had been contending with an utterly non-urgent vibe from other people in relation to the Grays Bay Road and Port Project. That is until recently, when a lot of those same people started calling him back.<\/p>\nGiven all roads lead to Donald Trump lately, it is no mystery why. In launching a trade war against Canada, the United States is no longer a friendly ally, at least at the top, and that is a driving reason behind why the narrative around roads that do not get built in the Arctic has shifted to one that Canada better start building roads, deepwater ports, naval installations, mines, power grids and fibre-optic networks as soon as possible or risk ceding its Arctic sovereignty and a northern treasure house of critical minerals to a foreign power.<\/p>\nSome of that treasure takes the form of gold, which is currently trading at around US$3,000 an ounce. Canadian gold miner Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. believes its Hope Bay property in the Northwest Territories could produce as much as 400,000 ounces per year.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 3<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThe Northwest Territories is peppered with more than 1,200 active mining claims, while Nunavut is believed to be home to up to 30 per cent of Canada\u2019s petroleum reserves and Yukon is ranked as a top 10 region worldwide in terms of its mineral endowment, according to the Fraser Institute\u2019s 2023 annual survey of mining companies. All told, the conversation around what all the untapped northern bounty could be worth begins in the trillions.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre speaks during a rally in Iqaluit last year. Liberal Leader Mark Carney, right, shakes hands with Nunavut Premier P.J. Akeeagok during a meeting in Iqaluit in March. Party leaders are starting to pay more attention to the North as the stakes rise around Canadian sovereignty.<\/span> Photo by Dustin Patar, Sean Kilpatrick<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nEvidence of this newfound sense of urgency to stop talking about the Arctic and start doing things keeps popping up in Nunavut. Liberal Leader Mark Carney, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre and NDP head Jagmeet Singh have all stopped in Iqaluit in recent weeks. Depending upon which party platform you pull from, the politicians have committed to more infrastructure, better collaboration with the Inuit, increased military spending, investing in energy upgrades and adequate housing and boosting Canada\u2019s capability to unleash the North\u2019s economic potential.<\/p>\n\u201cCanadians used to be fond of the old Winston Churchill quote about Americans that they will ultimately do the right thing after trying everything else,\u201d Bell said. \u201cBut as it pertains to the Arctic, Canada has literally tried everything else. We have tried ignoring it. We have tried underinvesting in its communities and in its infrastructure. We have tried letting the Americans be responsible for our continental defence. And, at last, we can see now that it just isn\u2019t sustainable. The mood of the country has changed.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 4<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBeing mightily ticked at Trump and expressing your patriotism by buying Canadian products at the grocery store is a much more straightforward and inexpensive (relatively speaking) way of taking control of your fate than supercharging the economic development of the North. As the old saying goes, you need to start somewhere, but outside of a few mines dotted here and there, developing the North has barely begun at all despite decades of promises to make it happen.<\/p>\nWhether the current generation can drum up the will and the cash to finally dig in and get big, ambitious projects done, ones that drive Arctic and national prosperity while safeguarding Canada from international bullies, could determine the country\u2019s long-term fate.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>The Americans have always understood the Northwest Passage as a security issue, which has meant keeping the Soviets, and now the Russians, away, said Rob Huebert, a political scientist at University of Calgary. With Donald Trump at the helm, that assumption has changed.<\/span> Photo by Larry Wong<\/span> \/Postmedia<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nIf that sounds alarmist, it is worth having a brief chat with Rob Huebert, a political scientist at the University of Calgary, about the Northwest Passage. In the days of yore, this shortcut between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans stoked the imagination of explorers, who would set off in search of an ice-free route and often get stuck in the ice.<\/p>\nNowadays, the passage is navigable for a stretch of time in the summer and fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key. Canada\u2019s position is that the Northwest Passage belongs to Canada. The Americans, to paraphrase, have long claimed the passage as international waters.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 5<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nIn practice, the disagreement between neighbours has been a remarkably polite affair. A U.S. ship has never entered the passage without first informing the Canadians what it is up to. Granted, Americans tell rather than ask for permission, but they also typically request a Canadian icebreaker be somewhere nearby in case they run into any problems with the ice.<\/p>\n\u201cThe Americans have always understood the Northwest Passage as a security issue, which has meant keeping the Soviets, and now the Russians, away,\u201d Huebert said.<\/p>\n\nWe are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North<\/p>\nRob Huebert, political scientist, University of Calgary<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nThe Americans have also historically done the heavy lifting in terms of keeping the Russians away, allowing Canada to blissfully flake out and, until last year, classify the Arctic as an \u201carea of exceptional\u201d peace, despite Russia having an extensive network of military bases and several nuclear-powered icebreakers at its disposal.<\/p>\n\u201cThe Russian threat is clearly understood,\u201d Huebert said. \u201cNow, all of a sudden, you get Trump back and he has shown a willingness to throw his allies under the bus, and he\u2019s also threatening the existence of Canada. We are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North.\u201d<\/p>\nThings are bad, but that could be good for West Kitikmeot\u2019s Grays Bay Road and Port Project. The company has received dribs and drabs of federal funding over the years to conduct road feasibility studies and the like, but there are no bulldozers on the immediate horizon.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 6<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThe proposal to build a 230-kilometre all-weather road in the middle of a mineral-rich area of the central Arctic, one that would tie into ice roads and ultimately connect a proposed deepwater port, featuring a bunch of bells (maintenance sheds) and whistles (an airstrip), to Yellowknife and southern Canada requires some chicken-and-egg-type thinking.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>A polar bear walks along the ice flow in the Franklin Strait in the Northwest Passage. The passage, once impregnable, is now open to ship navigation in the summer and part of the fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key.<\/span> Photo by Jonathan Hayward<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nThe major mineral deposits \u2014 copper, zinc, gold and silver \u2014 do not need to be discovered. Mining companies have been aware of their existence for decades. Bell\u2019s contention is that if you build the main road, branch roads leading to new mines will follow as the economics of developing a mine go from, \u201cWe know the copper is there, but we just can\u2019t get to it,\u201d to, \u201cWe know the copper is there and we now have a way of getting it to market.\u201d<\/p>\nThe proposed deepwater port could also serve a dual purpose. After all, the Canadian navy is going to need somewhere to dock given that the Nanisivik Naval Facility, first announced by prime minister Stephen Harper in 2007 and repeatedly scaled back since then in scope and plagued by construction delays, including a sinking wharf and a lead contractor going bankrupt, as well as rife with boneheaded, impractical design elements, such as unheated fuel tanks, still doesn\u2019t have an opening date.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 7<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWere the Royal Canadian Navy to commit to a long-term lease agreement with West Kitikmeot, the company could take it as proof of future revenue in order to raise capital from the private sector in an arrangement Bell foresees being split 75-25 between public and private.<\/p>\nOn that front, he has been meeting with the Department of National Defence to understand the scope of the navy\u2019s needs. There is progress. Moving forward, a road could include a fibre-optic communications corridor and potentially even a liquefied natural gas pipeline.<\/p>\n\nNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along<\/p>\nBrendan Bell, CEO, West Kitikmeot Resources<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along; they\u2019re going to need something more concrete than that,\u201d he said. \u201cThat\u2019s really the next piece for us to solve.\u201d<\/p>\nOf course, the uncomfortable question is, how much is the road going to cost?<\/p>\nBell hesitates to give a hard number because the number he is working with is a projection based on a study from 2018, but he figures if you start at $1 billion, and throw in another $400 million or so for the port, then you would be on the right track.<\/p>\nBuilding anything in the Arctic is going to involve some sticker shock. Also required is a keen understanding that the ground beneath whatever gets built \u2014 a road, port, school, town or mine \u2014 may melt. Instead of the sort of bedrock structural engineers favour when sinking construction pilings, the Arctic, particularly the western portion, is filled with permafrost, or permanently frozen ground that is now in the process of permanently unfreezing at an alarming rate.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 8<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cWhen we talk about building in the Arctic, foundation designers have to start to consider how much overdesigning we are going to have to do to anticipate what a building will need in 30 years\u2019 time,\u201d Chris Burn, a physical geography professor at Carleton University, said. \u201cIf we build things to today\u2019s code, all is going to be well, it\u2019ll be just fine, but then in 15 years there\u2019s going to be a problem.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Brendan Bell, right, is chief executive of West Kitikmeot Resources Corp., an Inuit-owned company proposing to build a road and deepwater ocean port in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Handout<\/span> \/West Kitikmeot Resources Corp.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nBurn is a Brit and attended a series of lectures on permafrost as an undergraduate in the 1970s. Halfway through the second one, he knew what he wanted to do with his life, and the place to do it, at least for an English-speaking scholar, was the Canadian Arctic.<\/p>\nHe went on to become president of the International Permafrost Association for a time, and he is somewhat of a legend in Canadian Arctic permafrost research circles. He is also the guy that northerners call to consult with on building projects, including the Inuvik-Tuktoyaktuk Highway.<\/p>\nThe 138-kilometre, two-lane, all-weather gravel road tying the community of Tuktoyaktuk on the Arctic coast to the rest of Canada\u2019s road network opened in 2017. The price tag was $300 million and its completion allowed Canada, 150 years post-Confederation, to claim it was connected by road from coast to coast to coast.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 9<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBut beneath the proudly Canadian optics of tethering the country north to south was the chilling reality of building infrastructure in the permafrost zone.<\/p>\n\u201cThe ice in the ground is what holds the permafrost together,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nThink of the ice as the glue. A new, hypothetical four-storey building built to serve an equally new, hypothetical Arctic outpost would typically be built on pilings. Current engineering wisdom allows that once pilings are sunk in the permafrost, a building is effectively frozen in place. But as the permafrost thaws, and the glue unsticks, the building could be on the move: sinking, shifting or toppling over altogether.<\/p>\nRoads are even more dicey. Buildings have small footprints, but future Arctic roads will traverse multiple building environments and the amount of ice-glue in the ground will vary depending on the location, Burn said.<\/p>\nIn a landscape that is humming with, say, mining projects, the ice-glue will need to support the weight of industrial-scale trucks. As long as the glue sticks, all will be well, but should the glue lose its stickiness due to temperature increases, the road would be in big trouble and need substantial repairs while those who travel upon it could be put at grave risk.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 10<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\nWe’re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre<\/p>\nChris Burn, geography professor, Carleton University<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cKnowing the quantity of ice underneath the road is a really critical part of the information needed to design the road because the designers have to decide how they\u2019re going to keep that ice frozen,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nOne bright idea has been to refrigerate the permafrost. The Shakwak corridor is a critical stretch of the Alaska Highway connecting the state, via Yukon and British Columbia, to the lower 48 states. Canada and the U.S. have long co-operated in maintaining the highway, and a big chunk of that job in recent decades has been figuring out what to do about the thawing permafrost causing gargantuan potholes, bumps and cracks, as well as warping guardrails at the highway\u2019s edge.<\/p>\nThe community of Beaver Creek in western Yukon piloted a project involving thermosyphons: picture a white pipe stuck in the ground next to the road that is designed to vent heat from beneath the road while carrying cold back into the permafrost. The gadgets are a relatively low-tech way of addressing thawing permafrost, but low-tech should not be confused with inexpensive.<\/p>\n\u201cBeaver Creek\u2019s thermosyphon project cost $4 million and that was for 400 metres of road, which would work out to about $8 million per kilometre,\u201d Burn said. \u201cWe\u2019re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre. We don\u2019t do that in Canada.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 11<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nOn top of that, road maintenance in areas of thawing permafrost is already six times pricier than maintaining roads in areas where the permafrost \u201cis stable or absent,\u201d according to the Yukon government. Burn said more thawing permafrost is in the cards, so more Arctic architects, road designers, maintenance types and accountants will presumably be puzzling over what to do about it and how to budget for it.<\/p>\nTaken as a whole, a great, imagined Arctic infrastructure build-out might seem a bit daunting, but Canada has not always been afraid of dreaming big. Consider John Diefenbaker\u2019s Northern Vision.<\/p>\nThe country\u2019s so-called Prairie populist prime minister uncorked a barnburner of a speech before a packed house at the Winnipeg Civic Auditorium during a 1958 election campaign that his Conservatives went on to win in a blowout. Diefenbaker, whose oratorical chops were substantial, was never finer nor more fiery that day as he spoke of a \u201cnew\u201d Canada infused with a sense of national purpose and destiny.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, delivers remarks at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa in 2023. Obed said, while the Inuit are the first Canadians, they view themselves as Canadians first.<\/span> Photo by Spencer Colby<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cHow many of you here knew the pioneers in Western Canada?\u201d he said. \u201cI saw the early days here, here in Winnipeg in 1909, when the vast movement was taking place into the Western plains \u2014\u00a0they had imagination. There is a new imagination now. The Arctic.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 12<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThis new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\nIt should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\nIn reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Brendan Bell knows what it is like to be ignored. It wasn\u2019t so many months ago that the chief executive of West Kitikmeot Resources Corp., an Inuit-owned company proposing to build a road and deepwater ocean port in the Arctic, was spending a chunk of each day waiting for non-Arctic people to return his phone calls to discuss the project.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cThis road is not a new idea,\u201d he said. \u201cRoads have a long history in the North.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 2<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<\/p>\n\nTHIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY<\/p>\nSubscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.<\/p>\n\nExclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O’Connor, Gabriel Friedman, and others.<\/li>\nDaily content from Financial Times, the world’s leading global business publication.<\/li>\nUnlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.<\/li>\nNational Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.<\/li>\nDaily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\nSUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES<\/p>\nSubscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.<\/p>\n\nExclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O’Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.<\/li>\nDaily content from Financial Times, the world’s leading global business publication.<\/li>\nUnlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.<\/li>\nNational Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.<\/li>\nDaily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\nREGISTER \/ SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES<\/p>\nCreate an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.<\/p>\n\nAccess articles from across Canada with one account.<\/li>\nShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.<\/li>\nEnjoy additional articles per month.<\/li>\nGet email updates from your favourite authors.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\nTHIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.<\/p>\nCreate an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.<\/p>\n\nAccess articles from across Canada with one account<\/li>\nShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments<\/li>\nEnjoy additional articles per month<\/li>\nGet email updates from your favourite authors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/header>\n\n\n\n\n\nSign In or Create an Account<\/h2>\nor<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nDo they ever. Yet that history can be summarized as roads \u2014 and major infrastructure projects of all types \u2014 may get proposed for the Arctic, but they generally don\u2019t get built. No surprise then that Bell had been contending with an utterly non-urgent vibe from other people in relation to the Grays Bay Road and Port Project. That is until recently, when a lot of those same people started calling him back.<\/p>\nGiven all roads lead to Donald Trump lately, it is no mystery why. In launching a trade war against Canada, the United States is no longer a friendly ally, at least at the top, and that is a driving reason behind why the narrative around roads that do not get built in the Arctic has shifted to one that Canada better start building roads, deepwater ports, naval installations, mines, power grids and fibre-optic networks as soon as possible or risk ceding its Arctic sovereignty and a northern treasure house of critical minerals to a foreign power.<\/p>\nSome of that treasure takes the form of gold, which is currently trading at around US$3,000 an ounce. Canadian gold miner Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. believes its Hope Bay property in the Northwest Territories could produce as much as 400,000 ounces per year.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 3<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThe Northwest Territories is peppered with more than 1,200 active mining claims, while Nunavut is believed to be home to up to 30 per cent of Canada\u2019s petroleum reserves and Yukon is ranked as a top 10 region worldwide in terms of its mineral endowment, according to the Fraser Institute\u2019s 2023 annual survey of mining companies. All told, the conversation around what all the untapped northern bounty could be worth begins in the trillions.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre speaks during a rally in Iqaluit last year. Liberal Leader Mark Carney, right, shakes hands with Nunavut Premier P.J. Akeeagok during a meeting in Iqaluit in March. Party leaders are starting to pay more attention to the North as the stakes rise around Canadian sovereignty.<\/span> Photo by Dustin Patar, Sean Kilpatrick<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nEvidence of this newfound sense of urgency to stop talking about the Arctic and start doing things keeps popping up in Nunavut. Liberal Leader Mark Carney, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre and NDP head Jagmeet Singh have all stopped in Iqaluit in recent weeks. Depending upon which party platform you pull from, the politicians have committed to more infrastructure, better collaboration with the Inuit, increased military spending, investing in energy upgrades and adequate housing and boosting Canada\u2019s capability to unleash the North\u2019s economic potential.<\/p>\n\u201cCanadians used to be fond of the old Winston Churchill quote about Americans that they will ultimately do the right thing after trying everything else,\u201d Bell said. \u201cBut as it pertains to the Arctic, Canada has literally tried everything else. We have tried ignoring it. We have tried underinvesting in its communities and in its infrastructure. We have tried letting the Americans be responsible for our continental defence. And, at last, we can see now that it just isn\u2019t sustainable. The mood of the country has changed.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 4<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBeing mightily ticked at Trump and expressing your patriotism by buying Canadian products at the grocery store is a much more straightforward and inexpensive (relatively speaking) way of taking control of your fate than supercharging the economic development of the North. As the old saying goes, you need to start somewhere, but outside of a few mines dotted here and there, developing the North has barely begun at all despite decades of promises to make it happen.<\/p>\nWhether the current generation can drum up the will and the cash to finally dig in and get big, ambitious projects done, ones that drive Arctic and national prosperity while safeguarding Canada from international bullies, could determine the country\u2019s long-term fate.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>The Americans have always understood the Northwest Passage as a security issue, which has meant keeping the Soviets, and now the Russians, away, said Rob Huebert, a political scientist at University of Calgary. With Donald Trump at the helm, that assumption has changed.<\/span> Photo by Larry Wong<\/span> \/Postmedia<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nIf that sounds alarmist, it is worth having a brief chat with Rob Huebert, a political scientist at the University of Calgary, about the Northwest Passage. In the days of yore, this shortcut between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans stoked the imagination of explorers, who would set off in search of an ice-free route and often get stuck in the ice.<\/p>\nNowadays, the passage is navigable for a stretch of time in the summer and fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key. Canada\u2019s position is that the Northwest Passage belongs to Canada. The Americans, to paraphrase, have long claimed the passage as international waters.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 5<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nIn practice, the disagreement between neighbours has been a remarkably polite affair. A U.S. ship has never entered the passage without first informing the Canadians what it is up to. Granted, Americans tell rather than ask for permission, but they also typically request a Canadian icebreaker be somewhere nearby in case they run into any problems with the ice.<\/p>\n\u201cThe Americans have always understood the Northwest Passage as a security issue, which has meant keeping the Soviets, and now the Russians, away,\u201d Huebert said.<\/p>\n\nWe are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North<\/p>\nRob Huebert, political scientist, University of Calgary<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nThe Americans have also historically done the heavy lifting in terms of keeping the Russians away, allowing Canada to blissfully flake out and, until last year, classify the Arctic as an \u201carea of exceptional\u201d peace, despite Russia having an extensive network of military bases and several nuclear-powered icebreakers at its disposal.<\/p>\n\u201cThe Russian threat is clearly understood,\u201d Huebert said. \u201cNow, all of a sudden, you get Trump back and he has shown a willingness to throw his allies under the bus, and he\u2019s also threatening the existence of Canada. We are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North.\u201d<\/p>\nThings are bad, but that could be good for West Kitikmeot\u2019s Grays Bay Road and Port Project. The company has received dribs and drabs of federal funding over the years to conduct road feasibility studies and the like, but there are no bulldozers on the immediate horizon.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 6<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThe proposal to build a 230-kilometre all-weather road in the middle of a mineral-rich area of the central Arctic, one that would tie into ice roads and ultimately connect a proposed deepwater port, featuring a bunch of bells (maintenance sheds) and whistles (an airstrip), to Yellowknife and southern Canada requires some chicken-and-egg-type thinking.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>A polar bear walks along the ice flow in the Franklin Strait in the Northwest Passage. The passage, once impregnable, is now open to ship navigation in the summer and part of the fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key.<\/span> Photo by Jonathan Hayward<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nThe major mineral deposits \u2014 copper, zinc, gold and silver \u2014 do not need to be discovered. Mining companies have been aware of their existence for decades. Bell\u2019s contention is that if you build the main road, branch roads leading to new mines will follow as the economics of developing a mine go from, \u201cWe know the copper is there, but we just can\u2019t get to it,\u201d to, \u201cWe know the copper is there and we now have a way of getting it to market.\u201d<\/p>\nThe proposed deepwater port could also serve a dual purpose. After all, the Canadian navy is going to need somewhere to dock given that the Nanisivik Naval Facility, first announced by prime minister Stephen Harper in 2007 and repeatedly scaled back since then in scope and plagued by construction delays, including a sinking wharf and a lead contractor going bankrupt, as well as rife with boneheaded, impractical design elements, such as unheated fuel tanks, still doesn\u2019t have an opening date.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 7<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWere the Royal Canadian Navy to commit to a long-term lease agreement with West Kitikmeot, the company could take it as proof of future revenue in order to raise capital from the private sector in an arrangement Bell foresees being split 75-25 between public and private.<\/p>\nOn that front, he has been meeting with the Department of National Defence to understand the scope of the navy\u2019s needs. There is progress. Moving forward, a road could include a fibre-optic communications corridor and potentially even a liquefied natural gas pipeline.<\/p>\n\nNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along<\/p>\nBrendan Bell, CEO, West Kitikmeot Resources<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along; they\u2019re going to need something more concrete than that,\u201d he said. \u201cThat\u2019s really the next piece for us to solve.\u201d<\/p>\nOf course, the uncomfortable question is, how much is the road going to cost?<\/p>\nBell hesitates to give a hard number because the number he is working with is a projection based on a study from 2018, but he figures if you start at $1 billion, and throw in another $400 million or so for the port, then you would be on the right track.<\/p>\nBuilding anything in the Arctic is going to involve some sticker shock. Also required is a keen understanding that the ground beneath whatever gets built \u2014 a road, port, school, town or mine \u2014 may melt. Instead of the sort of bedrock structural engineers favour when sinking construction pilings, the Arctic, particularly the western portion, is filled with permafrost, or permanently frozen ground that is now in the process of permanently unfreezing at an alarming rate.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 8<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cWhen we talk about building in the Arctic, foundation designers have to start to consider how much overdesigning we are going to have to do to anticipate what a building will need in 30 years\u2019 time,\u201d Chris Burn, a physical geography professor at Carleton University, said. \u201cIf we build things to today\u2019s code, all is going to be well, it\u2019ll be just fine, but then in 15 years there\u2019s going to be a problem.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Brendan Bell, right, is chief executive of West Kitikmeot Resources Corp., an Inuit-owned company proposing to build a road and deepwater ocean port in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Handout<\/span> \/West Kitikmeot Resources Corp.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nBurn is a Brit and attended a series of lectures on permafrost as an undergraduate in the 1970s. Halfway through the second one, he knew what he wanted to do with his life, and the place to do it, at least for an English-speaking scholar, was the Canadian Arctic.<\/p>\nHe went on to become president of the International Permafrost Association for a time, and he is somewhat of a legend in Canadian Arctic permafrost research circles. He is also the guy that northerners call to consult with on building projects, including the Inuvik-Tuktoyaktuk Highway.<\/p>\nThe 138-kilometre, two-lane, all-weather gravel road tying the community of Tuktoyaktuk on the Arctic coast to the rest of Canada\u2019s road network opened in 2017. The price tag was $300 million and its completion allowed Canada, 150 years post-Confederation, to claim it was connected by road from coast to coast to coast.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 9<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBut beneath the proudly Canadian optics of tethering the country north to south was the chilling reality of building infrastructure in the permafrost zone.<\/p>\n\u201cThe ice in the ground is what holds the permafrost together,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nThink of the ice as the glue. A new, hypothetical four-storey building built to serve an equally new, hypothetical Arctic outpost would typically be built on pilings. Current engineering wisdom allows that once pilings are sunk in the permafrost, a building is effectively frozen in place. But as the permafrost thaws, and the glue unsticks, the building could be on the move: sinking, shifting or toppling over altogether.<\/p>\nRoads are even more dicey. Buildings have small footprints, but future Arctic roads will traverse multiple building environments and the amount of ice-glue in the ground will vary depending on the location, Burn said.<\/p>\nIn a landscape that is humming with, say, mining projects, the ice-glue will need to support the weight of industrial-scale trucks. As long as the glue sticks, all will be well, but should the glue lose its stickiness due to temperature increases, the road would be in big trouble and need substantial repairs while those who travel upon it could be put at grave risk.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 10<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\nWe’re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre<\/p>\nChris Burn, geography professor, Carleton University<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cKnowing the quantity of ice underneath the road is a really critical part of the information needed to design the road because the designers have to decide how they\u2019re going to keep that ice frozen,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nOne bright idea has been to refrigerate the permafrost. The Shakwak corridor is a critical stretch of the Alaska Highway connecting the state, via Yukon and British Columbia, to the lower 48 states. Canada and the U.S. have long co-operated in maintaining the highway, and a big chunk of that job in recent decades has been figuring out what to do about the thawing permafrost causing gargantuan potholes, bumps and cracks, as well as warping guardrails at the highway\u2019s edge.<\/p>\nThe community of Beaver Creek in western Yukon piloted a project involving thermosyphons: picture a white pipe stuck in the ground next to the road that is designed to vent heat from beneath the road while carrying cold back into the permafrost. The gadgets are a relatively low-tech way of addressing thawing permafrost, but low-tech should not be confused with inexpensive.<\/p>\n\u201cBeaver Creek\u2019s thermosyphon project cost $4 million and that was for 400 metres of road, which would work out to about $8 million per kilometre,\u201d Burn said. \u201cWe\u2019re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre. We don\u2019t do that in Canada.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 11<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nOn top of that, road maintenance in areas of thawing permafrost is already six times pricier than maintaining roads in areas where the permafrost \u201cis stable or absent,\u201d according to the Yukon government. Burn said more thawing permafrost is in the cards, so more Arctic architects, road designers, maintenance types and accountants will presumably be puzzling over what to do about it and how to budget for it.<\/p>\nTaken as a whole, a great, imagined Arctic infrastructure build-out might seem a bit daunting, but Canada has not always been afraid of dreaming big. Consider John Diefenbaker\u2019s Northern Vision.<\/p>\nThe country\u2019s so-called Prairie populist prime minister uncorked a barnburner of a speech before a packed house at the Winnipeg Civic Auditorium during a 1958 election campaign that his Conservatives went on to win in a blowout. Diefenbaker, whose oratorical chops were substantial, was never finer nor more fiery that day as he spoke of a \u201cnew\u201d Canada infused with a sense of national purpose and destiny.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, delivers remarks at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa in 2023. Obed said, while the Inuit are the first Canadians, they view themselves as Canadians first.<\/span> Photo by Spencer Colby<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cHow many of you here knew the pioneers in Western Canada?\u201d he said. \u201cI saw the early days here, here in Winnipeg in 1909, when the vast movement was taking place into the Western plains \u2014\u00a0they had imagination. There is a new imagination now. The Arctic.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 12<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThis new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\nIt should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\nIn reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Article content<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cThis road is not a new idea,\u201d he said. \u201cRoads have a long history in the North.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 2<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<\/p>\n\nTHIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY<\/p>\nSubscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.<\/p>\n\nExclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O’Connor, Gabriel Friedman, and others.<\/li>\nDaily content from Financial Times, the world’s leading global business publication.<\/li>\nUnlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.<\/li>\nNational Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.<\/li>\nDaily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\nSUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES<\/p>\nSubscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.<\/p>\n\nExclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O’Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.<\/li>\nDaily content from Financial Times, the world’s leading global business publication.<\/li>\nUnlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.<\/li>\nNational Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.<\/li>\nDaily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\nREGISTER \/ SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES<\/p>\nCreate an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.<\/p>\n\nAccess articles from across Canada with one account.<\/li>\nShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.<\/li>\nEnjoy additional articles per month.<\/li>\nGet email updates from your favourite authors.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\nTHIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.<\/p>\nCreate an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.<\/p>\n\nAccess articles from across Canada with one account<\/li>\nShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments<\/li>\nEnjoy additional articles per month<\/li>\nGet email updates from your favourite authors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/header>\n\n\n\n\n\nSign In or Create an Account<\/h2>\nor<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nDo they ever. Yet that history can be summarized as roads \u2014 and major infrastructure projects of all types \u2014 may get proposed for the Arctic, but they generally don\u2019t get built. No surprise then that Bell had been contending with an utterly non-urgent vibe from other people in relation to the Grays Bay Road and Port Project. That is until recently, when a lot of those same people started calling him back.<\/p>\nGiven all roads lead to Donald Trump lately, it is no mystery why. In launching a trade war against Canada, the United States is no longer a friendly ally, at least at the top, and that is a driving reason behind why the narrative around roads that do not get built in the Arctic has shifted to one that Canada better start building roads, deepwater ports, naval installations, mines, power grids and fibre-optic networks as soon as possible or risk ceding its Arctic sovereignty and a northern treasure house of critical minerals to a foreign power.<\/p>\nSome of that treasure takes the form of gold, which is currently trading at around US$3,000 an ounce. Canadian gold miner Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. believes its Hope Bay property in the Northwest Territories could produce as much as 400,000 ounces per year.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 3<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThe Northwest Territories is peppered with more than 1,200 active mining claims, while Nunavut is believed to be home to up to 30 per cent of Canada\u2019s petroleum reserves and Yukon is ranked as a top 10 region worldwide in terms of its mineral endowment, according to the Fraser Institute\u2019s 2023 annual survey of mining companies. All told, the conversation around what all the untapped northern bounty could be worth begins in the trillions.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre speaks during a rally in Iqaluit last year. Liberal Leader Mark Carney, right, shakes hands with Nunavut Premier P.J. Akeeagok during a meeting in Iqaluit in March. Party leaders are starting to pay more attention to the North as the stakes rise around Canadian sovereignty.<\/span> Photo by Dustin Patar, Sean Kilpatrick<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nEvidence of this newfound sense of urgency to stop talking about the Arctic and start doing things keeps popping up in Nunavut. Liberal Leader Mark Carney, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre and NDP head Jagmeet Singh have all stopped in Iqaluit in recent weeks. Depending upon which party platform you pull from, the politicians have committed to more infrastructure, better collaboration with the Inuit, increased military spending, investing in energy upgrades and adequate housing and boosting Canada\u2019s capability to unleash the North\u2019s economic potential.<\/p>\n\u201cCanadians used to be fond of the old Winston Churchill quote about Americans that they will ultimately do the right thing after trying everything else,\u201d Bell said. \u201cBut as it pertains to the Arctic, Canada has literally tried everything else. We have tried ignoring it. We have tried underinvesting in its communities and in its infrastructure. We have tried letting the Americans be responsible for our continental defence. And, at last, we can see now that it just isn\u2019t sustainable. The mood of the country has changed.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 4<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBeing mightily ticked at Trump and expressing your patriotism by buying Canadian products at the grocery store is a much more straightforward and inexpensive (relatively speaking) way of taking control of your fate than supercharging the economic development of the North. As the old saying goes, you need to start somewhere, but outside of a few mines dotted here and there, developing the North has barely begun at all despite decades of promises to make it happen.<\/p>\nWhether the current generation can drum up the will and the cash to finally dig in and get big, ambitious projects done, ones that drive Arctic and national prosperity while safeguarding Canada from international bullies, could determine the country\u2019s long-term fate.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>The Americans have always understood the Northwest Passage as a security issue, which has meant keeping the Soviets, and now the Russians, away, said Rob Huebert, a political scientist at University of Calgary. With Donald Trump at the helm, that assumption has changed.<\/span> Photo by Larry Wong<\/span> \/Postmedia<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nIf that sounds alarmist, it is worth having a brief chat with Rob Huebert, a political scientist at the University of Calgary, about the Northwest Passage. In the days of yore, this shortcut between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans stoked the imagination of explorers, who would set off in search of an ice-free route and often get stuck in the ice.<\/p>\nNowadays, the passage is navigable for a stretch of time in the summer and fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key. Canada\u2019s position is that the Northwest Passage belongs to Canada. The Americans, to paraphrase, have long claimed the passage as international waters.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 5<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nIn practice, the disagreement between neighbours has been a remarkably polite affair. A U.S. ship has never entered the passage without first informing the Canadians what it is up to. Granted, Americans tell rather than ask for permission, but they also typically request a Canadian icebreaker be somewhere nearby in case they run into any problems with the ice.<\/p>\n\u201cThe Americans have always understood the Northwest Passage as a security issue, which has meant keeping the Soviets, and now the Russians, away,\u201d Huebert said.<\/p>\n\nWe are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North<\/p>\nRob Huebert, political scientist, University of Calgary<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nThe Americans have also historically done the heavy lifting in terms of keeping the Russians away, allowing Canada to blissfully flake out and, until last year, classify the Arctic as an \u201carea of exceptional\u201d peace, despite Russia having an extensive network of military bases and several nuclear-powered icebreakers at its disposal.<\/p>\n\u201cThe Russian threat is clearly understood,\u201d Huebert said. \u201cNow, all of a sudden, you get Trump back and he has shown a willingness to throw his allies under the bus, and he\u2019s also threatening the existence of Canada. We are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North.\u201d<\/p>\nThings are bad, but that could be good for West Kitikmeot\u2019s Grays Bay Road and Port Project. The company has received dribs and drabs of federal funding over the years to conduct road feasibility studies and the like, but there are no bulldozers on the immediate horizon.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 6<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThe proposal to build a 230-kilometre all-weather road in the middle of a mineral-rich area of the central Arctic, one that would tie into ice roads and ultimately connect a proposed deepwater port, featuring a bunch of bells (maintenance sheds) and whistles (an airstrip), to Yellowknife and southern Canada requires some chicken-and-egg-type thinking.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>A polar bear walks along the ice flow in the Franklin Strait in the Northwest Passage. The passage, once impregnable, is now open to ship navigation in the summer and part of the fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key.<\/span> Photo by Jonathan Hayward<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nThe major mineral deposits \u2014 copper, zinc, gold and silver \u2014 do not need to be discovered. Mining companies have been aware of their existence for decades. Bell\u2019s contention is that if you build the main road, branch roads leading to new mines will follow as the economics of developing a mine go from, \u201cWe know the copper is there, but we just can\u2019t get to it,\u201d to, \u201cWe know the copper is there and we now have a way of getting it to market.\u201d<\/p>\nThe proposed deepwater port could also serve a dual purpose. After all, the Canadian navy is going to need somewhere to dock given that the Nanisivik Naval Facility, first announced by prime minister Stephen Harper in 2007 and repeatedly scaled back since then in scope and plagued by construction delays, including a sinking wharf and a lead contractor going bankrupt, as well as rife with boneheaded, impractical design elements, such as unheated fuel tanks, still doesn\u2019t have an opening date.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 7<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWere the Royal Canadian Navy to commit to a long-term lease agreement with West Kitikmeot, the company could take it as proof of future revenue in order to raise capital from the private sector in an arrangement Bell foresees being split 75-25 between public and private.<\/p>\nOn that front, he has been meeting with the Department of National Defence to understand the scope of the navy\u2019s needs. There is progress. Moving forward, a road could include a fibre-optic communications corridor and potentially even a liquefied natural gas pipeline.<\/p>\n\nNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along<\/p>\nBrendan Bell, CEO, West Kitikmeot Resources<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along; they\u2019re going to need something more concrete than that,\u201d he said. \u201cThat\u2019s really the next piece for us to solve.\u201d<\/p>\nOf course, the uncomfortable question is, how much is the road going to cost?<\/p>\nBell hesitates to give a hard number because the number he is working with is a projection based on a study from 2018, but he figures if you start at $1 billion, and throw in another $400 million or so for the port, then you would be on the right track.<\/p>\nBuilding anything in the Arctic is going to involve some sticker shock. Also required is a keen understanding that the ground beneath whatever gets built \u2014 a road, port, school, town or mine \u2014 may melt. Instead of the sort of bedrock structural engineers favour when sinking construction pilings, the Arctic, particularly the western portion, is filled with permafrost, or permanently frozen ground that is now in the process of permanently unfreezing at an alarming rate.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 8<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cWhen we talk about building in the Arctic, foundation designers have to start to consider how much overdesigning we are going to have to do to anticipate what a building will need in 30 years\u2019 time,\u201d Chris Burn, a physical geography professor at Carleton University, said. \u201cIf we build things to today\u2019s code, all is going to be well, it\u2019ll be just fine, but then in 15 years there\u2019s going to be a problem.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Brendan Bell, right, is chief executive of West Kitikmeot Resources Corp., an Inuit-owned company proposing to build a road and deepwater ocean port in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Handout<\/span> \/West Kitikmeot Resources Corp.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nBurn is a Brit and attended a series of lectures on permafrost as an undergraduate in the 1970s. Halfway through the second one, he knew what he wanted to do with his life, and the place to do it, at least for an English-speaking scholar, was the Canadian Arctic.<\/p>\nHe went on to become president of the International Permafrost Association for a time, and he is somewhat of a legend in Canadian Arctic permafrost research circles. He is also the guy that northerners call to consult with on building projects, including the Inuvik-Tuktoyaktuk Highway.<\/p>\nThe 138-kilometre, two-lane, all-weather gravel road tying the community of Tuktoyaktuk on the Arctic coast to the rest of Canada\u2019s road network opened in 2017. The price tag was $300 million and its completion allowed Canada, 150 years post-Confederation, to claim it was connected by road from coast to coast to coast.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 9<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBut beneath the proudly Canadian optics of tethering the country north to south was the chilling reality of building infrastructure in the permafrost zone.<\/p>\n\u201cThe ice in the ground is what holds the permafrost together,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nThink of the ice as the glue. A new, hypothetical four-storey building built to serve an equally new, hypothetical Arctic outpost would typically be built on pilings. Current engineering wisdom allows that once pilings are sunk in the permafrost, a building is effectively frozen in place. But as the permafrost thaws, and the glue unsticks, the building could be on the move: sinking, shifting or toppling over altogether.<\/p>\nRoads are even more dicey. Buildings have small footprints, but future Arctic roads will traverse multiple building environments and the amount of ice-glue in the ground will vary depending on the location, Burn said.<\/p>\nIn a landscape that is humming with, say, mining projects, the ice-glue will need to support the weight of industrial-scale trucks. As long as the glue sticks, all will be well, but should the glue lose its stickiness due to temperature increases, the road would be in big trouble and need substantial repairs while those who travel upon it could be put at grave risk.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 10<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\nWe’re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre<\/p>\nChris Burn, geography professor, Carleton University<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cKnowing the quantity of ice underneath the road is a really critical part of the information needed to design the road because the designers have to decide how they\u2019re going to keep that ice frozen,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nOne bright idea has been to refrigerate the permafrost. The Shakwak corridor is a critical stretch of the Alaska Highway connecting the state, via Yukon and British Columbia, to the lower 48 states. Canada and the U.S. have long co-operated in maintaining the highway, and a big chunk of that job in recent decades has been figuring out what to do about the thawing permafrost causing gargantuan potholes, bumps and cracks, as well as warping guardrails at the highway\u2019s edge.<\/p>\nThe community of Beaver Creek in western Yukon piloted a project involving thermosyphons: picture a white pipe stuck in the ground next to the road that is designed to vent heat from beneath the road while carrying cold back into the permafrost. The gadgets are a relatively low-tech way of addressing thawing permafrost, but low-tech should not be confused with inexpensive.<\/p>\n\u201cBeaver Creek\u2019s thermosyphon project cost $4 million and that was for 400 metres of road, which would work out to about $8 million per kilometre,\u201d Burn said. \u201cWe\u2019re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre. We don\u2019t do that in Canada.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 11<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nOn top of that, road maintenance in areas of thawing permafrost is already six times pricier than maintaining roads in areas where the permafrost \u201cis stable or absent,\u201d according to the Yukon government. Burn said more thawing permafrost is in the cards, so more Arctic architects, road designers, maintenance types and accountants will presumably be puzzling over what to do about it and how to budget for it.<\/p>\nTaken as a whole, a great, imagined Arctic infrastructure build-out might seem a bit daunting, but Canada has not always been afraid of dreaming big. Consider John Diefenbaker\u2019s Northern Vision.<\/p>\nThe country\u2019s so-called Prairie populist prime minister uncorked a barnburner of a speech before a packed house at the Winnipeg Civic Auditorium during a 1958 election campaign that his Conservatives went on to win in a blowout. Diefenbaker, whose oratorical chops were substantial, was never finer nor more fiery that day as he spoke of a \u201cnew\u201d Canada infused with a sense of national purpose and destiny.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, delivers remarks at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa in 2023. Obed said, while the Inuit are the first Canadians, they view themselves as Canadians first.<\/span> Photo by Spencer Colby<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cHow many of you here knew the pioneers in Western Canada?\u201d he said. \u201cI saw the early days here, here in Winnipeg in 1909, when the vast movement was taking place into the Western plains \u2014\u00a0they had imagination. There is a new imagination now. The Arctic.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 12<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThis new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\nIt should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\nIn reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Article content<\/p>\n
\u201cThis road is not a new idea,\u201d he said. \u201cRoads have a long history in the North.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n
Advertisement 2<\/p>\n
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY<\/p>\n
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.<\/p>\n
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES<\/p>\n
REGISTER \/ SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES<\/p>\n
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.<\/p>\n
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.<\/p>\n
or<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nDo they ever. Yet that history can be summarized as roads \u2014 and major infrastructure projects of all types \u2014 may get proposed for the Arctic, but they generally don\u2019t get built. No surprise then that Bell had been contending with an utterly non-urgent vibe from other people in relation to the Grays Bay Road and Port Project. That is until recently, when a lot of those same people started calling him back.<\/p>\nGiven all roads lead to Donald Trump lately, it is no mystery why. In launching a trade war against Canada, the United States is no longer a friendly ally, at least at the top, and that is a driving reason behind why the narrative around roads that do not get built in the Arctic has shifted to one that Canada better start building roads, deepwater ports, naval installations, mines, power grids and fibre-optic networks as soon as possible or risk ceding its Arctic sovereignty and a northern treasure house of critical minerals to a foreign power.<\/p>\nSome of that treasure takes the form of gold, which is currently trading at around US$3,000 an ounce. Canadian gold miner Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. believes its Hope Bay property in the Northwest Territories could produce as much as 400,000 ounces per year.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 3<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThe Northwest Territories is peppered with more than 1,200 active mining claims, while Nunavut is believed to be home to up to 30 per cent of Canada\u2019s petroleum reserves and Yukon is ranked as a top 10 region worldwide in terms of its mineral endowment, according to the Fraser Institute\u2019s 2023 annual survey of mining companies. All told, the conversation around what all the untapped northern bounty could be worth begins in the trillions.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre speaks during a rally in Iqaluit last year. Liberal Leader Mark Carney, right, shakes hands with Nunavut Premier P.J. Akeeagok during a meeting in Iqaluit in March. Party leaders are starting to pay more attention to the North as the stakes rise around Canadian sovereignty.<\/span> Photo by Dustin Patar, Sean Kilpatrick<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nEvidence of this newfound sense of urgency to stop talking about the Arctic and start doing things keeps popping up in Nunavut. Liberal Leader Mark Carney, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre and NDP head Jagmeet Singh have all stopped in Iqaluit in recent weeks. Depending upon which party platform you pull from, the politicians have committed to more infrastructure, better collaboration with the Inuit, increased military spending, investing in energy upgrades and adequate housing and boosting Canada\u2019s capability to unleash the North\u2019s economic potential.<\/p>\n\u201cCanadians used to be fond of the old Winston Churchill quote about Americans that they will ultimately do the right thing after trying everything else,\u201d Bell said. \u201cBut as it pertains to the Arctic, Canada has literally tried everything else. We have tried ignoring it. We have tried underinvesting in its communities and in its infrastructure. We have tried letting the Americans be responsible for our continental defence. And, at last, we can see now that it just isn\u2019t sustainable. The mood of the country has changed.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 4<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBeing mightily ticked at Trump and expressing your patriotism by buying Canadian products at the grocery store is a much more straightforward and inexpensive (relatively speaking) way of taking control of your fate than supercharging the economic development of the North. As the old saying goes, you need to start somewhere, but outside of a few mines dotted here and there, developing the North has barely begun at all despite decades of promises to make it happen.<\/p>\nWhether the current generation can drum up the will and the cash to finally dig in and get big, ambitious projects done, ones that drive Arctic and national prosperity while safeguarding Canada from international bullies, could determine the country\u2019s long-term fate.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>The Americans have always understood the Northwest Passage as a security issue, which has meant keeping the Soviets, and now the Russians, away, said Rob Huebert, a political scientist at University of Calgary. With Donald Trump at the helm, that assumption has changed.<\/span> Photo by Larry Wong<\/span> \/Postmedia<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nIf that sounds alarmist, it is worth having a brief chat with Rob Huebert, a political scientist at the University of Calgary, about the Northwest Passage. In the days of yore, this shortcut between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans stoked the imagination of explorers, who would set off in search of an ice-free route and often get stuck in the ice.<\/p>\nNowadays, the passage is navigable for a stretch of time in the summer and fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key. Canada\u2019s position is that the Northwest Passage belongs to Canada. The Americans, to paraphrase, have long claimed the passage as international waters.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 5<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nIn practice, the disagreement between neighbours has been a remarkably polite affair. A U.S. ship has never entered the passage without first informing the Canadians what it is up to. Granted, Americans tell rather than ask for permission, but they also typically request a Canadian icebreaker be somewhere nearby in case they run into any problems with the ice.<\/p>\n\u201cThe Americans have always understood the Northwest Passage as a security issue, which has meant keeping the Soviets, and now the Russians, away,\u201d Huebert said.<\/p>\n\nWe are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North<\/p>\nRob Huebert, political scientist, University of Calgary<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nThe Americans have also historically done the heavy lifting in terms of keeping the Russians away, allowing Canada to blissfully flake out and, until last year, classify the Arctic as an \u201carea of exceptional\u201d peace, despite Russia having an extensive network of military bases and several nuclear-powered icebreakers at its disposal.<\/p>\n\u201cThe Russian threat is clearly understood,\u201d Huebert said. \u201cNow, all of a sudden, you get Trump back and he has shown a willingness to throw his allies under the bus, and he\u2019s also threatening the existence of Canada. We are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North.\u201d<\/p>\nThings are bad, but that could be good for West Kitikmeot\u2019s Grays Bay Road and Port Project. The company has received dribs and drabs of federal funding over the years to conduct road feasibility studies and the like, but there are no bulldozers on the immediate horizon.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 6<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThe proposal to build a 230-kilometre all-weather road in the middle of a mineral-rich area of the central Arctic, one that would tie into ice roads and ultimately connect a proposed deepwater port, featuring a bunch of bells (maintenance sheds) and whistles (an airstrip), to Yellowknife and southern Canada requires some chicken-and-egg-type thinking.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>A polar bear walks along the ice flow in the Franklin Strait in the Northwest Passage. The passage, once impregnable, is now open to ship navigation in the summer and part of the fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key.<\/span> Photo by Jonathan Hayward<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nThe major mineral deposits \u2014 copper, zinc, gold and silver \u2014 do not need to be discovered. Mining companies have been aware of their existence for decades. Bell\u2019s contention is that if you build the main road, branch roads leading to new mines will follow as the economics of developing a mine go from, \u201cWe know the copper is there, but we just can\u2019t get to it,\u201d to, \u201cWe know the copper is there and we now have a way of getting it to market.\u201d<\/p>\nThe proposed deepwater port could also serve a dual purpose. After all, the Canadian navy is going to need somewhere to dock given that the Nanisivik Naval Facility, first announced by prime minister Stephen Harper in 2007 and repeatedly scaled back since then in scope and plagued by construction delays, including a sinking wharf and a lead contractor going bankrupt, as well as rife with boneheaded, impractical design elements, such as unheated fuel tanks, still doesn\u2019t have an opening date.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 7<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWere the Royal Canadian Navy to commit to a long-term lease agreement with West Kitikmeot, the company could take it as proof of future revenue in order to raise capital from the private sector in an arrangement Bell foresees being split 75-25 between public and private.<\/p>\nOn that front, he has been meeting with the Department of National Defence to understand the scope of the navy\u2019s needs. There is progress. Moving forward, a road could include a fibre-optic communications corridor and potentially even a liquefied natural gas pipeline.<\/p>\n\nNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along<\/p>\nBrendan Bell, CEO, West Kitikmeot Resources<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along; they\u2019re going to need something more concrete than that,\u201d he said. \u201cThat\u2019s really the next piece for us to solve.\u201d<\/p>\nOf course, the uncomfortable question is, how much is the road going to cost?<\/p>\nBell hesitates to give a hard number because the number he is working with is a projection based on a study from 2018, but he figures if you start at $1 billion, and throw in another $400 million or so for the port, then you would be on the right track.<\/p>\nBuilding anything in the Arctic is going to involve some sticker shock. Also required is a keen understanding that the ground beneath whatever gets built \u2014 a road, port, school, town or mine \u2014 may melt. Instead of the sort of bedrock structural engineers favour when sinking construction pilings, the Arctic, particularly the western portion, is filled with permafrost, or permanently frozen ground that is now in the process of permanently unfreezing at an alarming rate.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 8<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cWhen we talk about building in the Arctic, foundation designers have to start to consider how much overdesigning we are going to have to do to anticipate what a building will need in 30 years\u2019 time,\u201d Chris Burn, a physical geography professor at Carleton University, said. \u201cIf we build things to today\u2019s code, all is going to be well, it\u2019ll be just fine, but then in 15 years there\u2019s going to be a problem.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Brendan Bell, right, is chief executive of West Kitikmeot Resources Corp., an Inuit-owned company proposing to build a road and deepwater ocean port in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Handout<\/span> \/West Kitikmeot Resources Corp.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nBurn is a Brit and attended a series of lectures on permafrost as an undergraduate in the 1970s. Halfway through the second one, he knew what he wanted to do with his life, and the place to do it, at least for an English-speaking scholar, was the Canadian Arctic.<\/p>\nHe went on to become president of the International Permafrost Association for a time, and he is somewhat of a legend in Canadian Arctic permafrost research circles. He is also the guy that northerners call to consult with on building projects, including the Inuvik-Tuktoyaktuk Highway.<\/p>\nThe 138-kilometre, two-lane, all-weather gravel road tying the community of Tuktoyaktuk on the Arctic coast to the rest of Canada\u2019s road network opened in 2017. The price tag was $300 million and its completion allowed Canada, 150 years post-Confederation, to claim it was connected by road from coast to coast to coast.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 9<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBut beneath the proudly Canadian optics of tethering the country north to south was the chilling reality of building infrastructure in the permafrost zone.<\/p>\n\u201cThe ice in the ground is what holds the permafrost together,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nThink of the ice as the glue. A new, hypothetical four-storey building built to serve an equally new, hypothetical Arctic outpost would typically be built on pilings. Current engineering wisdom allows that once pilings are sunk in the permafrost, a building is effectively frozen in place. But as the permafrost thaws, and the glue unsticks, the building could be on the move: sinking, shifting or toppling over altogether.<\/p>\nRoads are even more dicey. Buildings have small footprints, but future Arctic roads will traverse multiple building environments and the amount of ice-glue in the ground will vary depending on the location, Burn said.<\/p>\nIn a landscape that is humming with, say, mining projects, the ice-glue will need to support the weight of industrial-scale trucks. As long as the glue sticks, all will be well, but should the glue lose its stickiness due to temperature increases, the road would be in big trouble and need substantial repairs while those who travel upon it could be put at grave risk.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 10<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\nWe’re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre<\/p>\nChris Burn, geography professor, Carleton University<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cKnowing the quantity of ice underneath the road is a really critical part of the information needed to design the road because the designers have to decide how they\u2019re going to keep that ice frozen,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nOne bright idea has been to refrigerate the permafrost. The Shakwak corridor is a critical stretch of the Alaska Highway connecting the state, via Yukon and British Columbia, to the lower 48 states. Canada and the U.S. have long co-operated in maintaining the highway, and a big chunk of that job in recent decades has been figuring out what to do about the thawing permafrost causing gargantuan potholes, bumps and cracks, as well as warping guardrails at the highway\u2019s edge.<\/p>\nThe community of Beaver Creek in western Yukon piloted a project involving thermosyphons: picture a white pipe stuck in the ground next to the road that is designed to vent heat from beneath the road while carrying cold back into the permafrost. The gadgets are a relatively low-tech way of addressing thawing permafrost, but low-tech should not be confused with inexpensive.<\/p>\n\u201cBeaver Creek\u2019s thermosyphon project cost $4 million and that was for 400 metres of road, which would work out to about $8 million per kilometre,\u201d Burn said. \u201cWe\u2019re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre. We don\u2019t do that in Canada.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 11<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nOn top of that, road maintenance in areas of thawing permafrost is already six times pricier than maintaining roads in areas where the permafrost \u201cis stable or absent,\u201d according to the Yukon government. Burn said more thawing permafrost is in the cards, so more Arctic architects, road designers, maintenance types and accountants will presumably be puzzling over what to do about it and how to budget for it.<\/p>\nTaken as a whole, a great, imagined Arctic infrastructure build-out might seem a bit daunting, but Canada has not always been afraid of dreaming big. Consider John Diefenbaker\u2019s Northern Vision.<\/p>\nThe country\u2019s so-called Prairie populist prime minister uncorked a barnburner of a speech before a packed house at the Winnipeg Civic Auditorium during a 1958 election campaign that his Conservatives went on to win in a blowout. Diefenbaker, whose oratorical chops were substantial, was never finer nor more fiery that day as he spoke of a \u201cnew\u201d Canada infused with a sense of national purpose and destiny.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, delivers remarks at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa in 2023. Obed said, while the Inuit are the first Canadians, they view themselves as Canadians first.<\/span> Photo by Spencer Colby<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cHow many of you here knew the pioneers in Western Canada?\u201d he said. \u201cI saw the early days here, here in Winnipeg in 1909, when the vast movement was taking place into the Western plains \u2014\u00a0they had imagination. There is a new imagination now. The Arctic.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 12<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThis new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\nIt should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\nIn reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Do they ever. Yet that history can be summarized as roads \u2014 and major infrastructure projects of all types \u2014 may get proposed for the Arctic, but they generally don\u2019t get built. No surprise then that Bell had been contending with an utterly non-urgent vibe from other people in relation to the Grays Bay Road and Port Project. That is until recently, when a lot of those same people started calling him back.<\/p>\n
Given all roads lead to Donald Trump lately, it is no mystery why. In launching a trade war against Canada, the United States is no longer a friendly ally, at least at the top, and that is a driving reason behind why the narrative around roads that do not get built in the Arctic has shifted to one that Canada better start building roads, deepwater ports, naval installations, mines, power grids and fibre-optic networks as soon as possible or risk ceding its Arctic sovereignty and a northern treasure house of critical minerals to a foreign power.<\/p>\n
Some of that treasure takes the form of gold, which is currently trading at around US$3,000 an ounce. Canadian gold miner Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. believes its Hope Bay property in the Northwest Territories could produce as much as 400,000 ounces per year.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n
Advertisement 3<\/p>\n
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThe Northwest Territories is peppered with more than 1,200 active mining claims, while Nunavut is believed to be home to up to 30 per cent of Canada\u2019s petroleum reserves and Yukon is ranked as a top 10 region worldwide in terms of its mineral endowment, according to the Fraser Institute\u2019s 2023 annual survey of mining companies. All told, the conversation around what all the untapped northern bounty could be worth begins in the trillions.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre speaks during a rally in Iqaluit last year. Liberal Leader Mark Carney, right, shakes hands with Nunavut Premier P.J. Akeeagok during a meeting in Iqaluit in March. Party leaders are starting to pay more attention to the North as the stakes rise around Canadian sovereignty.<\/span> Photo by Dustin Patar, Sean Kilpatrick<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nEvidence of this newfound sense of urgency to stop talking about the Arctic and start doing things keeps popping up in Nunavut. Liberal Leader Mark Carney, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre and NDP head Jagmeet Singh have all stopped in Iqaluit in recent weeks. Depending upon which party platform you pull from, the politicians have committed to more infrastructure, better collaboration with the Inuit, increased military spending, investing in energy upgrades and adequate housing and boosting Canada\u2019s capability to unleash the North\u2019s economic potential.<\/p>\n\u201cCanadians used to be fond of the old Winston Churchill quote about Americans that they will ultimately do the right thing after trying everything else,\u201d Bell said. \u201cBut as it pertains to the Arctic, Canada has literally tried everything else. We have tried ignoring it. We have tried underinvesting in its communities and in its infrastructure. We have tried letting the Americans be responsible for our continental defence. And, at last, we can see now that it just isn\u2019t sustainable. The mood of the country has changed.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 4<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBeing mightily ticked at Trump and expressing your patriotism by buying Canadian products at the grocery store is a much more straightforward and inexpensive (relatively speaking) way of taking control of your fate than supercharging the economic development of the North. As the old saying goes, you need to start somewhere, but outside of a few mines dotted here and there, developing the North has barely begun at all despite decades of promises to make it happen.<\/p>\nWhether the current generation can drum up the will and the cash to finally dig in and get big, ambitious projects done, ones that drive Arctic and national prosperity while safeguarding Canada from international bullies, could determine the country\u2019s long-term fate.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>The Americans have always understood the Northwest Passage as a security issue, which has meant keeping the Soviets, and now the Russians, away, said Rob Huebert, a political scientist at University of Calgary. With Donald Trump at the helm, that assumption has changed.<\/span> Photo by Larry Wong<\/span> \/Postmedia<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nIf that sounds alarmist, it is worth having a brief chat with Rob Huebert, a political scientist at the University of Calgary, about the Northwest Passage. In the days of yore, this shortcut between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans stoked the imagination of explorers, who would set off in search of an ice-free route and often get stuck in the ice.<\/p>\nNowadays, the passage is navigable for a stretch of time in the summer and fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key. Canada\u2019s position is that the Northwest Passage belongs to Canada. The Americans, to paraphrase, have long claimed the passage as international waters.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 5<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nIn practice, the disagreement between neighbours has been a remarkably polite affair. A U.S. ship has never entered the passage without first informing the Canadians what it is up to. Granted, Americans tell rather than ask for permission, but they also typically request a Canadian icebreaker be somewhere nearby in case they run into any problems with the ice.<\/p>\n\u201cThe Americans have always understood the Northwest Passage as a security issue, which has meant keeping the Soviets, and now the Russians, away,\u201d Huebert said.<\/p>\n\nWe are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North<\/p>\nRob Huebert, political scientist, University of Calgary<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nThe Americans have also historically done the heavy lifting in terms of keeping the Russians away, allowing Canada to blissfully flake out and, until last year, classify the Arctic as an \u201carea of exceptional\u201d peace, despite Russia having an extensive network of military bases and several nuclear-powered icebreakers at its disposal.<\/p>\n\u201cThe Russian threat is clearly understood,\u201d Huebert said. \u201cNow, all of a sudden, you get Trump back and he has shown a willingness to throw his allies under the bus, and he\u2019s also threatening the existence of Canada. We are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North.\u201d<\/p>\nThings are bad, but that could be good for West Kitikmeot\u2019s Grays Bay Road and Port Project. The company has received dribs and drabs of federal funding over the years to conduct road feasibility studies and the like, but there are no bulldozers on the immediate horizon.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 6<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThe proposal to build a 230-kilometre all-weather road in the middle of a mineral-rich area of the central Arctic, one that would tie into ice roads and ultimately connect a proposed deepwater port, featuring a bunch of bells (maintenance sheds) and whistles (an airstrip), to Yellowknife and southern Canada requires some chicken-and-egg-type thinking.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>A polar bear walks along the ice flow in the Franklin Strait in the Northwest Passage. The passage, once impregnable, is now open to ship navigation in the summer and part of the fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key.<\/span> Photo by Jonathan Hayward<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nThe major mineral deposits \u2014 copper, zinc, gold and silver \u2014 do not need to be discovered. Mining companies have been aware of their existence for decades. Bell\u2019s contention is that if you build the main road, branch roads leading to new mines will follow as the economics of developing a mine go from, \u201cWe know the copper is there, but we just can\u2019t get to it,\u201d to, \u201cWe know the copper is there and we now have a way of getting it to market.\u201d<\/p>\nThe proposed deepwater port could also serve a dual purpose. After all, the Canadian navy is going to need somewhere to dock given that the Nanisivik Naval Facility, first announced by prime minister Stephen Harper in 2007 and repeatedly scaled back since then in scope and plagued by construction delays, including a sinking wharf and a lead contractor going bankrupt, as well as rife with boneheaded, impractical design elements, such as unheated fuel tanks, still doesn\u2019t have an opening date.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 7<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWere the Royal Canadian Navy to commit to a long-term lease agreement with West Kitikmeot, the company could take it as proof of future revenue in order to raise capital from the private sector in an arrangement Bell foresees being split 75-25 between public and private.<\/p>\nOn that front, he has been meeting with the Department of National Defence to understand the scope of the navy\u2019s needs. There is progress. Moving forward, a road could include a fibre-optic communications corridor and potentially even a liquefied natural gas pipeline.<\/p>\n\nNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along<\/p>\nBrendan Bell, CEO, West Kitikmeot Resources<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along; they\u2019re going to need something more concrete than that,\u201d he said. \u201cThat\u2019s really the next piece for us to solve.\u201d<\/p>\nOf course, the uncomfortable question is, how much is the road going to cost?<\/p>\nBell hesitates to give a hard number because the number he is working with is a projection based on a study from 2018, but he figures if you start at $1 billion, and throw in another $400 million or so for the port, then you would be on the right track.<\/p>\nBuilding anything in the Arctic is going to involve some sticker shock. Also required is a keen understanding that the ground beneath whatever gets built \u2014 a road, port, school, town or mine \u2014 may melt. Instead of the sort of bedrock structural engineers favour when sinking construction pilings, the Arctic, particularly the western portion, is filled with permafrost, or permanently frozen ground that is now in the process of permanently unfreezing at an alarming rate.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 8<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cWhen we talk about building in the Arctic, foundation designers have to start to consider how much overdesigning we are going to have to do to anticipate what a building will need in 30 years\u2019 time,\u201d Chris Burn, a physical geography professor at Carleton University, said. \u201cIf we build things to today\u2019s code, all is going to be well, it\u2019ll be just fine, but then in 15 years there\u2019s going to be a problem.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Brendan Bell, right, is chief executive of West Kitikmeot Resources Corp., an Inuit-owned company proposing to build a road and deepwater ocean port in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Handout<\/span> \/West Kitikmeot Resources Corp.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nBurn is a Brit and attended a series of lectures on permafrost as an undergraduate in the 1970s. Halfway through the second one, he knew what he wanted to do with his life, and the place to do it, at least for an English-speaking scholar, was the Canadian Arctic.<\/p>\nHe went on to become president of the International Permafrost Association for a time, and he is somewhat of a legend in Canadian Arctic permafrost research circles. He is also the guy that northerners call to consult with on building projects, including the Inuvik-Tuktoyaktuk Highway.<\/p>\nThe 138-kilometre, two-lane, all-weather gravel road tying the community of Tuktoyaktuk on the Arctic coast to the rest of Canada\u2019s road network opened in 2017. The price tag was $300 million and its completion allowed Canada, 150 years post-Confederation, to claim it was connected by road from coast to coast to coast.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 9<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBut beneath the proudly Canadian optics of tethering the country north to south was the chilling reality of building infrastructure in the permafrost zone.<\/p>\n\u201cThe ice in the ground is what holds the permafrost together,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nThink of the ice as the glue. A new, hypothetical four-storey building built to serve an equally new, hypothetical Arctic outpost would typically be built on pilings. Current engineering wisdom allows that once pilings are sunk in the permafrost, a building is effectively frozen in place. But as the permafrost thaws, and the glue unsticks, the building could be on the move: sinking, shifting or toppling over altogether.<\/p>\nRoads are even more dicey. Buildings have small footprints, but future Arctic roads will traverse multiple building environments and the amount of ice-glue in the ground will vary depending on the location, Burn said.<\/p>\nIn a landscape that is humming with, say, mining projects, the ice-glue will need to support the weight of industrial-scale trucks. As long as the glue sticks, all will be well, but should the glue lose its stickiness due to temperature increases, the road would be in big trouble and need substantial repairs while those who travel upon it could be put at grave risk.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 10<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\nWe’re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre<\/p>\nChris Burn, geography professor, Carleton University<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cKnowing the quantity of ice underneath the road is a really critical part of the information needed to design the road because the designers have to decide how they\u2019re going to keep that ice frozen,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nOne bright idea has been to refrigerate the permafrost. The Shakwak corridor is a critical stretch of the Alaska Highway connecting the state, via Yukon and British Columbia, to the lower 48 states. Canada and the U.S. have long co-operated in maintaining the highway, and a big chunk of that job in recent decades has been figuring out what to do about the thawing permafrost causing gargantuan potholes, bumps and cracks, as well as warping guardrails at the highway\u2019s edge.<\/p>\nThe community of Beaver Creek in western Yukon piloted a project involving thermosyphons: picture a white pipe stuck in the ground next to the road that is designed to vent heat from beneath the road while carrying cold back into the permafrost. The gadgets are a relatively low-tech way of addressing thawing permafrost, but low-tech should not be confused with inexpensive.<\/p>\n\u201cBeaver Creek\u2019s thermosyphon project cost $4 million and that was for 400 metres of road, which would work out to about $8 million per kilometre,\u201d Burn said. \u201cWe\u2019re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre. We don\u2019t do that in Canada.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 11<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nOn top of that, road maintenance in areas of thawing permafrost is already six times pricier than maintaining roads in areas where the permafrost \u201cis stable or absent,\u201d according to the Yukon government. Burn said more thawing permafrost is in the cards, so more Arctic architects, road designers, maintenance types and accountants will presumably be puzzling over what to do about it and how to budget for it.<\/p>\nTaken as a whole, a great, imagined Arctic infrastructure build-out might seem a bit daunting, but Canada has not always been afraid of dreaming big. Consider John Diefenbaker\u2019s Northern Vision.<\/p>\nThe country\u2019s so-called Prairie populist prime minister uncorked a barnburner of a speech before a packed house at the Winnipeg Civic Auditorium during a 1958 election campaign that his Conservatives went on to win in a blowout. Diefenbaker, whose oratorical chops were substantial, was never finer nor more fiery that day as he spoke of a \u201cnew\u201d Canada infused with a sense of national purpose and destiny.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, delivers remarks at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa in 2023. Obed said, while the Inuit are the first Canadians, they view themselves as Canadians first.<\/span> Photo by Spencer Colby<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cHow many of you here knew the pioneers in Western Canada?\u201d he said. \u201cI saw the early days here, here in Winnipeg in 1909, when the vast movement was taking place into the Western plains \u2014\u00a0they had imagination. There is a new imagination now. The Arctic.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 12<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThis new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\nIt should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\nIn reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Northwest Territories is peppered with more than 1,200 active mining claims, while Nunavut is believed to be home to up to 30 per cent of Canada\u2019s petroleum reserves and Yukon is ranked as a top 10 region worldwide in terms of its mineral endowment, according to the Fraser Institute\u2019s 2023 annual survey of mining companies. All told, the conversation around what all the untapped northern bounty could be worth begins in the trillions.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre speaks during a rally in Iqaluit last year. Liberal Leader Mark Carney, right, shakes hands with Nunavut Premier P.J. Akeeagok during a meeting in Iqaluit in March. Party leaders are starting to pay more attention to the North as the stakes rise around Canadian sovereignty.<\/span> Photo by Dustin Patar, Sean Kilpatrick<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nEvidence of this newfound sense of urgency to stop talking about the Arctic and start doing things keeps popping up in Nunavut. Liberal Leader Mark Carney, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre and NDP head Jagmeet Singh have all stopped in Iqaluit in recent weeks. Depending upon which party platform you pull from, the politicians have committed to more infrastructure, better collaboration with the Inuit, increased military spending, investing in energy upgrades and adequate housing and boosting Canada\u2019s capability to unleash the North\u2019s economic potential.<\/p>\n\u201cCanadians used to be fond of the old Winston Churchill quote about Americans that they will ultimately do the right thing after trying everything else,\u201d Bell said. \u201cBut as it pertains to the Arctic, Canada has literally tried everything else. We have tried ignoring it. We have tried underinvesting in its communities and in its infrastructure. We have tried letting the Americans be responsible for our continental defence. And, at last, we can see now that it just isn\u2019t sustainable. The mood of the country has changed.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 4<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBeing mightily ticked at Trump and expressing your patriotism by buying Canadian products at the grocery store is a much more straightforward and inexpensive (relatively speaking) way of taking control of your fate than supercharging the economic development of the North. As the old saying goes, you need to start somewhere, but outside of a few mines dotted here and there, developing the North has barely begun at all despite decades of promises to make it happen.<\/p>\nWhether the current generation can drum up the will and the cash to finally dig in and get big, ambitious projects done, ones that drive Arctic and national prosperity while safeguarding Canada from international bullies, could determine the country\u2019s long-term fate.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>The Americans have always understood the Northwest Passage as a security issue, which has meant keeping the Soviets, and now the Russians, away, said Rob Huebert, a political scientist at University of Calgary. With Donald Trump at the helm, that assumption has changed.<\/span> Photo by Larry Wong<\/span> \/Postmedia<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nIf that sounds alarmist, it is worth having a brief chat with Rob Huebert, a political scientist at the University of Calgary, about the Northwest Passage. In the days of yore, this shortcut between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans stoked the imagination of explorers, who would set off in search of an ice-free route and often get stuck in the ice.<\/p>\nNowadays, the passage is navigable for a stretch of time in the summer and fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key. Canada\u2019s position is that the Northwest Passage belongs to Canada. The Americans, to paraphrase, have long claimed the passage as international waters.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 5<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nIn practice, the disagreement between neighbours has been a remarkably polite affair. A U.S. ship has never entered the passage without first informing the Canadians what it is up to. Granted, Americans tell rather than ask for permission, but they also typically request a Canadian icebreaker be somewhere nearby in case they run into any problems with the ice.<\/p>\n\u201cThe Americans have always understood the Northwest Passage as a security issue, which has meant keeping the Soviets, and now the Russians, away,\u201d Huebert said.<\/p>\n\nWe are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North<\/p>\nRob Huebert, political scientist, University of Calgary<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nThe Americans have also historically done the heavy lifting in terms of keeping the Russians away, allowing Canada to blissfully flake out and, until last year, classify the Arctic as an \u201carea of exceptional\u201d peace, despite Russia having an extensive network of military bases and several nuclear-powered icebreakers at its disposal.<\/p>\n\u201cThe Russian threat is clearly understood,\u201d Huebert said. \u201cNow, all of a sudden, you get Trump back and he has shown a willingness to throw his allies under the bus, and he\u2019s also threatening the existence of Canada. We are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North.\u201d<\/p>\nThings are bad, but that could be good for West Kitikmeot\u2019s Grays Bay Road and Port Project. The company has received dribs and drabs of federal funding over the years to conduct road feasibility studies and the like, but there are no bulldozers on the immediate horizon.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 6<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThe proposal to build a 230-kilometre all-weather road in the middle of a mineral-rich area of the central Arctic, one that would tie into ice roads and ultimately connect a proposed deepwater port, featuring a bunch of bells (maintenance sheds) and whistles (an airstrip), to Yellowknife and southern Canada requires some chicken-and-egg-type thinking.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>A polar bear walks along the ice flow in the Franklin Strait in the Northwest Passage. The passage, once impregnable, is now open to ship navigation in the summer and part of the fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key.<\/span> Photo by Jonathan Hayward<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nThe major mineral deposits \u2014 copper, zinc, gold and silver \u2014 do not need to be discovered. Mining companies have been aware of their existence for decades. Bell\u2019s contention is that if you build the main road, branch roads leading to new mines will follow as the economics of developing a mine go from, \u201cWe know the copper is there, but we just can\u2019t get to it,\u201d to, \u201cWe know the copper is there and we now have a way of getting it to market.\u201d<\/p>\nThe proposed deepwater port could also serve a dual purpose. After all, the Canadian navy is going to need somewhere to dock given that the Nanisivik Naval Facility, first announced by prime minister Stephen Harper in 2007 and repeatedly scaled back since then in scope and plagued by construction delays, including a sinking wharf and a lead contractor going bankrupt, as well as rife with boneheaded, impractical design elements, such as unheated fuel tanks, still doesn\u2019t have an opening date.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 7<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWere the Royal Canadian Navy to commit to a long-term lease agreement with West Kitikmeot, the company could take it as proof of future revenue in order to raise capital from the private sector in an arrangement Bell foresees being split 75-25 between public and private.<\/p>\nOn that front, he has been meeting with the Department of National Defence to understand the scope of the navy\u2019s needs. There is progress. Moving forward, a road could include a fibre-optic communications corridor and potentially even a liquefied natural gas pipeline.<\/p>\n\nNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along<\/p>\nBrendan Bell, CEO, West Kitikmeot Resources<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along; they\u2019re going to need something more concrete than that,\u201d he said. \u201cThat\u2019s really the next piece for us to solve.\u201d<\/p>\nOf course, the uncomfortable question is, how much is the road going to cost?<\/p>\nBell hesitates to give a hard number because the number he is working with is a projection based on a study from 2018, but he figures if you start at $1 billion, and throw in another $400 million or so for the port, then you would be on the right track.<\/p>\nBuilding anything in the Arctic is going to involve some sticker shock. Also required is a keen understanding that the ground beneath whatever gets built \u2014 a road, port, school, town or mine \u2014 may melt. Instead of the sort of bedrock structural engineers favour when sinking construction pilings, the Arctic, particularly the western portion, is filled with permafrost, or permanently frozen ground that is now in the process of permanently unfreezing at an alarming rate.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 8<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cWhen we talk about building in the Arctic, foundation designers have to start to consider how much overdesigning we are going to have to do to anticipate what a building will need in 30 years\u2019 time,\u201d Chris Burn, a physical geography professor at Carleton University, said. \u201cIf we build things to today\u2019s code, all is going to be well, it\u2019ll be just fine, but then in 15 years there\u2019s going to be a problem.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Brendan Bell, right, is chief executive of West Kitikmeot Resources Corp., an Inuit-owned company proposing to build a road and deepwater ocean port in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Handout<\/span> \/West Kitikmeot Resources Corp.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nBurn is a Brit and attended a series of lectures on permafrost as an undergraduate in the 1970s. Halfway through the second one, he knew what he wanted to do with his life, and the place to do it, at least for an English-speaking scholar, was the Canadian Arctic.<\/p>\nHe went on to become president of the International Permafrost Association for a time, and he is somewhat of a legend in Canadian Arctic permafrost research circles. He is also the guy that northerners call to consult with on building projects, including the Inuvik-Tuktoyaktuk Highway.<\/p>\nThe 138-kilometre, two-lane, all-weather gravel road tying the community of Tuktoyaktuk on the Arctic coast to the rest of Canada\u2019s road network opened in 2017. The price tag was $300 million and its completion allowed Canada, 150 years post-Confederation, to claim it was connected by road from coast to coast to coast.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 9<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBut beneath the proudly Canadian optics of tethering the country north to south was the chilling reality of building infrastructure in the permafrost zone.<\/p>\n\u201cThe ice in the ground is what holds the permafrost together,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nThink of the ice as the glue. A new, hypothetical four-storey building built to serve an equally new, hypothetical Arctic outpost would typically be built on pilings. Current engineering wisdom allows that once pilings are sunk in the permafrost, a building is effectively frozen in place. But as the permafrost thaws, and the glue unsticks, the building could be on the move: sinking, shifting or toppling over altogether.<\/p>\nRoads are even more dicey. Buildings have small footprints, but future Arctic roads will traverse multiple building environments and the amount of ice-glue in the ground will vary depending on the location, Burn said.<\/p>\nIn a landscape that is humming with, say, mining projects, the ice-glue will need to support the weight of industrial-scale trucks. As long as the glue sticks, all will be well, but should the glue lose its stickiness due to temperature increases, the road would be in big trouble and need substantial repairs while those who travel upon it could be put at grave risk.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 10<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\nWe’re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre<\/p>\nChris Burn, geography professor, Carleton University<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cKnowing the quantity of ice underneath the road is a really critical part of the information needed to design the road because the designers have to decide how they\u2019re going to keep that ice frozen,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nOne bright idea has been to refrigerate the permafrost. The Shakwak corridor is a critical stretch of the Alaska Highway connecting the state, via Yukon and British Columbia, to the lower 48 states. Canada and the U.S. have long co-operated in maintaining the highway, and a big chunk of that job in recent decades has been figuring out what to do about the thawing permafrost causing gargantuan potholes, bumps and cracks, as well as warping guardrails at the highway\u2019s edge.<\/p>\nThe community of Beaver Creek in western Yukon piloted a project involving thermosyphons: picture a white pipe stuck in the ground next to the road that is designed to vent heat from beneath the road while carrying cold back into the permafrost. The gadgets are a relatively low-tech way of addressing thawing permafrost, but low-tech should not be confused with inexpensive.<\/p>\n\u201cBeaver Creek\u2019s thermosyphon project cost $4 million and that was for 400 metres of road, which would work out to about $8 million per kilometre,\u201d Burn said. \u201cWe\u2019re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre. We don\u2019t do that in Canada.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 11<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nOn top of that, road maintenance in areas of thawing permafrost is already six times pricier than maintaining roads in areas where the permafrost \u201cis stable or absent,\u201d according to the Yukon government. Burn said more thawing permafrost is in the cards, so more Arctic architects, road designers, maintenance types and accountants will presumably be puzzling over what to do about it and how to budget for it.<\/p>\nTaken as a whole, a great, imagined Arctic infrastructure build-out might seem a bit daunting, but Canada has not always been afraid of dreaming big. Consider John Diefenbaker\u2019s Northern Vision.<\/p>\nThe country\u2019s so-called Prairie populist prime minister uncorked a barnburner of a speech before a packed house at the Winnipeg Civic Auditorium during a 1958 election campaign that his Conservatives went on to win in a blowout. Diefenbaker, whose oratorical chops were substantial, was never finer nor more fiery that day as he spoke of a \u201cnew\u201d Canada infused with a sense of national purpose and destiny.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, delivers remarks at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa in 2023. Obed said, while the Inuit are the first Canadians, they view themselves as Canadians first.<\/span> Photo by Spencer Colby<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cHow many of you here knew the pioneers in Western Canada?\u201d he said. \u201cI saw the early days here, here in Winnipeg in 1909, when the vast movement was taking place into the Western plains \u2014\u00a0they had imagination. There is a new imagination now. The Arctic.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 12<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThis new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\nIt should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\nIn reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Article content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre speaks during a rally in Iqaluit last year. Liberal Leader Mark Carney, right, shakes hands with Nunavut Premier P.J. Akeeagok during a meeting in Iqaluit in March. Party leaders are starting to pay more attention to the North as the stakes rise around Canadian sovereignty.<\/span> Photo by Dustin Patar, Sean Kilpatrick<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nEvidence of this newfound sense of urgency to stop talking about the Arctic and start doing things keeps popping up in Nunavut. Liberal Leader Mark Carney, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre and NDP head Jagmeet Singh have all stopped in Iqaluit in recent weeks. Depending upon which party platform you pull from, the politicians have committed to more infrastructure, better collaboration with the Inuit, increased military spending, investing in energy upgrades and adequate housing and boosting Canada\u2019s capability to unleash the North\u2019s economic potential.<\/p>\n\u201cCanadians used to be fond of the old Winston Churchill quote about Americans that they will ultimately do the right thing after trying everything else,\u201d Bell said. \u201cBut as it pertains to the Arctic, Canada has literally tried everything else. We have tried ignoring it. We have tried underinvesting in its communities and in its infrastructure. We have tried letting the Americans be responsible for our continental defence. And, at last, we can see now that it just isn\u2019t sustainable. The mood of the country has changed.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 4<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBeing mightily ticked at Trump and expressing your patriotism by buying Canadian products at the grocery store is a much more straightforward and inexpensive (relatively speaking) way of taking control of your fate than supercharging the economic development of the North. As the old saying goes, you need to start somewhere, but outside of a few mines dotted here and there, developing the North has barely begun at all despite decades of promises to make it happen.<\/p>\nWhether the current generation can drum up the will and the cash to finally dig in and get big, ambitious projects done, ones that drive Arctic and national prosperity while safeguarding Canada from international bullies, could determine the country\u2019s long-term fate.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>The Americans have always understood the Northwest Passage as a security issue, which has meant keeping the Soviets, and now the Russians, away, said Rob Huebert, a political scientist at University of Calgary. With Donald Trump at the helm, that assumption has changed.<\/span> Photo by Larry Wong<\/span> \/Postmedia<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nIf that sounds alarmist, it is worth having a brief chat with Rob Huebert, a political scientist at the University of Calgary, about the Northwest Passage. In the days of yore, this shortcut between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans stoked the imagination of explorers, who would set off in search of an ice-free route and often get stuck in the ice.<\/p>\nNowadays, the passage is navigable for a stretch of time in the summer and fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key. Canada\u2019s position is that the Northwest Passage belongs to Canada. The Americans, to paraphrase, have long claimed the passage as international waters.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 5<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nIn practice, the disagreement between neighbours has been a remarkably polite affair. A U.S. ship has never entered the passage without first informing the Canadians what it is up to. Granted, Americans tell rather than ask for permission, but they also typically request a Canadian icebreaker be somewhere nearby in case they run into any problems with the ice.<\/p>\n\u201cThe Americans have always understood the Northwest Passage as a security issue, which has meant keeping the Soviets, and now the Russians, away,\u201d Huebert said.<\/p>\n\nWe are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North<\/p>\nRob Huebert, political scientist, University of Calgary<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nThe Americans have also historically done the heavy lifting in terms of keeping the Russians away, allowing Canada to blissfully flake out and, until last year, classify the Arctic as an \u201carea of exceptional\u201d peace, despite Russia having an extensive network of military bases and several nuclear-powered icebreakers at its disposal.<\/p>\n\u201cThe Russian threat is clearly understood,\u201d Huebert said. \u201cNow, all of a sudden, you get Trump back and he has shown a willingness to throw his allies under the bus, and he\u2019s also threatening the existence of Canada. We are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North.\u201d<\/p>\nThings are bad, but that could be good for West Kitikmeot\u2019s Grays Bay Road and Port Project. The company has received dribs and drabs of federal funding over the years to conduct road feasibility studies and the like, but there are no bulldozers on the immediate horizon.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 6<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThe proposal to build a 230-kilometre all-weather road in the middle of a mineral-rich area of the central Arctic, one that would tie into ice roads and ultimately connect a proposed deepwater port, featuring a bunch of bells (maintenance sheds) and whistles (an airstrip), to Yellowknife and southern Canada requires some chicken-and-egg-type thinking.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>A polar bear walks along the ice flow in the Franklin Strait in the Northwest Passage. The passage, once impregnable, is now open to ship navigation in the summer and part of the fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key.<\/span> Photo by Jonathan Hayward<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nThe major mineral deposits \u2014 copper, zinc, gold and silver \u2014 do not need to be discovered. Mining companies have been aware of their existence for decades. Bell\u2019s contention is that if you build the main road, branch roads leading to new mines will follow as the economics of developing a mine go from, \u201cWe know the copper is there, but we just can\u2019t get to it,\u201d to, \u201cWe know the copper is there and we now have a way of getting it to market.\u201d<\/p>\nThe proposed deepwater port could also serve a dual purpose. After all, the Canadian navy is going to need somewhere to dock given that the Nanisivik Naval Facility, first announced by prime minister Stephen Harper in 2007 and repeatedly scaled back since then in scope and plagued by construction delays, including a sinking wharf and a lead contractor going bankrupt, as well as rife with boneheaded, impractical design elements, such as unheated fuel tanks, still doesn\u2019t have an opening date.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 7<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWere the Royal Canadian Navy to commit to a long-term lease agreement with West Kitikmeot, the company could take it as proof of future revenue in order to raise capital from the private sector in an arrangement Bell foresees being split 75-25 between public and private.<\/p>\nOn that front, he has been meeting with the Department of National Defence to understand the scope of the navy\u2019s needs. There is progress. Moving forward, a road could include a fibre-optic communications corridor and potentially even a liquefied natural gas pipeline.<\/p>\n\nNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along<\/p>\nBrendan Bell, CEO, West Kitikmeot Resources<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along; they\u2019re going to need something more concrete than that,\u201d he said. \u201cThat\u2019s really the next piece for us to solve.\u201d<\/p>\nOf course, the uncomfortable question is, how much is the road going to cost?<\/p>\nBell hesitates to give a hard number because the number he is working with is a projection based on a study from 2018, but he figures if you start at $1 billion, and throw in another $400 million or so for the port, then you would be on the right track.<\/p>\nBuilding anything in the Arctic is going to involve some sticker shock. Also required is a keen understanding that the ground beneath whatever gets built \u2014 a road, port, school, town or mine \u2014 may melt. Instead of the sort of bedrock structural engineers favour when sinking construction pilings, the Arctic, particularly the western portion, is filled with permafrost, or permanently frozen ground that is now in the process of permanently unfreezing at an alarming rate.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 8<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cWhen we talk about building in the Arctic, foundation designers have to start to consider how much overdesigning we are going to have to do to anticipate what a building will need in 30 years\u2019 time,\u201d Chris Burn, a physical geography professor at Carleton University, said. \u201cIf we build things to today\u2019s code, all is going to be well, it\u2019ll be just fine, but then in 15 years there\u2019s going to be a problem.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Brendan Bell, right, is chief executive of West Kitikmeot Resources Corp., an Inuit-owned company proposing to build a road and deepwater ocean port in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Handout<\/span> \/West Kitikmeot Resources Corp.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nBurn is a Brit and attended a series of lectures on permafrost as an undergraduate in the 1970s. Halfway through the second one, he knew what he wanted to do with his life, and the place to do it, at least for an English-speaking scholar, was the Canadian Arctic.<\/p>\nHe went on to become president of the International Permafrost Association for a time, and he is somewhat of a legend in Canadian Arctic permafrost research circles. He is also the guy that northerners call to consult with on building projects, including the Inuvik-Tuktoyaktuk Highway.<\/p>\nThe 138-kilometre, two-lane, all-weather gravel road tying the community of Tuktoyaktuk on the Arctic coast to the rest of Canada\u2019s road network opened in 2017. The price tag was $300 million and its completion allowed Canada, 150 years post-Confederation, to claim it was connected by road from coast to coast to coast.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 9<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBut beneath the proudly Canadian optics of tethering the country north to south was the chilling reality of building infrastructure in the permafrost zone.<\/p>\n\u201cThe ice in the ground is what holds the permafrost together,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nThink of the ice as the glue. A new, hypothetical four-storey building built to serve an equally new, hypothetical Arctic outpost would typically be built on pilings. Current engineering wisdom allows that once pilings are sunk in the permafrost, a building is effectively frozen in place. But as the permafrost thaws, and the glue unsticks, the building could be on the move: sinking, shifting or toppling over altogether.<\/p>\nRoads are even more dicey. Buildings have small footprints, but future Arctic roads will traverse multiple building environments and the amount of ice-glue in the ground will vary depending on the location, Burn said.<\/p>\nIn a landscape that is humming with, say, mining projects, the ice-glue will need to support the weight of industrial-scale trucks. As long as the glue sticks, all will be well, but should the glue lose its stickiness due to temperature increases, the road would be in big trouble and need substantial repairs while those who travel upon it could be put at grave risk.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 10<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\nWe’re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre<\/p>\nChris Burn, geography professor, Carleton University<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cKnowing the quantity of ice underneath the road is a really critical part of the information needed to design the road because the designers have to decide how they\u2019re going to keep that ice frozen,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nOne bright idea has been to refrigerate the permafrost. The Shakwak corridor is a critical stretch of the Alaska Highway connecting the state, via Yukon and British Columbia, to the lower 48 states. Canada and the U.S. have long co-operated in maintaining the highway, and a big chunk of that job in recent decades has been figuring out what to do about the thawing permafrost causing gargantuan potholes, bumps and cracks, as well as warping guardrails at the highway\u2019s edge.<\/p>\nThe community of Beaver Creek in western Yukon piloted a project involving thermosyphons: picture a white pipe stuck in the ground next to the road that is designed to vent heat from beneath the road while carrying cold back into the permafrost. The gadgets are a relatively low-tech way of addressing thawing permafrost, but low-tech should not be confused with inexpensive.<\/p>\n\u201cBeaver Creek\u2019s thermosyphon project cost $4 million and that was for 400 metres of road, which would work out to about $8 million per kilometre,\u201d Burn said. \u201cWe\u2019re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre. We don\u2019t do that in Canada.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 11<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nOn top of that, road maintenance in areas of thawing permafrost is already six times pricier than maintaining roads in areas where the permafrost \u201cis stable or absent,\u201d according to the Yukon government. Burn said more thawing permafrost is in the cards, so more Arctic architects, road designers, maintenance types and accountants will presumably be puzzling over what to do about it and how to budget for it.<\/p>\nTaken as a whole, a great, imagined Arctic infrastructure build-out might seem a bit daunting, but Canada has not always been afraid of dreaming big. Consider John Diefenbaker\u2019s Northern Vision.<\/p>\nThe country\u2019s so-called Prairie populist prime minister uncorked a barnburner of a speech before a packed house at the Winnipeg Civic Auditorium during a 1958 election campaign that his Conservatives went on to win in a blowout. Diefenbaker, whose oratorical chops were substantial, was never finer nor more fiery that day as he spoke of a \u201cnew\u201d Canada infused with a sense of national purpose and destiny.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, delivers remarks at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa in 2023. Obed said, while the Inuit are the first Canadians, they view themselves as Canadians first.<\/span> Photo by Spencer Colby<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cHow many of you here knew the pioneers in Western Canada?\u201d he said. \u201cI saw the early days here, here in Winnipeg in 1909, when the vast movement was taking place into the Western plains \u2014\u00a0they had imagination. There is a new imagination now. The Arctic.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 12<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThis new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\nIt should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\nIn reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Evidence of this newfound sense of urgency to stop talking about the Arctic and start doing things keeps popping up in Nunavut. Liberal Leader Mark Carney, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre and NDP head Jagmeet Singh have all stopped in Iqaluit in recent weeks. Depending upon which party platform you pull from, the politicians have committed to more infrastructure, better collaboration with the Inuit, increased military spending, investing in energy upgrades and adequate housing and boosting Canada\u2019s capability to unleash the North\u2019s economic potential.<\/p>\n
\u201cCanadians used to be fond of the old Winston Churchill quote about Americans that they will ultimately do the right thing after trying everything else,\u201d Bell said. \u201cBut as it pertains to the Arctic, Canada has literally tried everything else. We have tried ignoring it. We have tried underinvesting in its communities and in its infrastructure. We have tried letting the Americans be responsible for our continental defence. And, at last, we can see now that it just isn\u2019t sustainable. The mood of the country has changed.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n
Advertisement 4<\/p>\n
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBeing mightily ticked at Trump and expressing your patriotism by buying Canadian products at the grocery store is a much more straightforward and inexpensive (relatively speaking) way of taking control of your fate than supercharging the economic development of the North. As the old saying goes, you need to start somewhere, but outside of a few mines dotted here and there, developing the North has barely begun at all despite decades of promises to make it happen.<\/p>\nWhether the current generation can drum up the will and the cash to finally dig in and get big, ambitious projects done, ones that drive Arctic and national prosperity while safeguarding Canada from international bullies, could determine the country\u2019s long-term fate.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>The Americans have always understood the Northwest Passage as a security issue, which has meant keeping the Soviets, and now the Russians, away, said Rob Huebert, a political scientist at University of Calgary. With Donald Trump at the helm, that assumption has changed.<\/span> Photo by Larry Wong<\/span> \/Postmedia<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nIf that sounds alarmist, it is worth having a brief chat with Rob Huebert, a political scientist at the University of Calgary, about the Northwest Passage. In the days of yore, this shortcut between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans stoked the imagination of explorers, who would set off in search of an ice-free route and often get stuck in the ice.<\/p>\nNowadays, the passage is navigable for a stretch of time in the summer and fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key. Canada\u2019s position is that the Northwest Passage belongs to Canada. The Americans, to paraphrase, have long claimed the passage as international waters.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 5<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nIn practice, the disagreement between neighbours has been a remarkably polite affair. A U.S. ship has never entered the passage without first informing the Canadians what it is up to. Granted, Americans tell rather than ask for permission, but they also typically request a Canadian icebreaker be somewhere nearby in case they run into any problems with the ice.<\/p>\n\u201cThe Americans have always understood the Northwest Passage as a security issue, which has meant keeping the Soviets, and now the Russians, away,\u201d Huebert said.<\/p>\n\nWe are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North<\/p>\nRob Huebert, political scientist, University of Calgary<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nThe Americans have also historically done the heavy lifting in terms of keeping the Russians away, allowing Canada to blissfully flake out and, until last year, classify the Arctic as an \u201carea of exceptional\u201d peace, despite Russia having an extensive network of military bases and several nuclear-powered icebreakers at its disposal.<\/p>\n\u201cThe Russian threat is clearly understood,\u201d Huebert said. \u201cNow, all of a sudden, you get Trump back and he has shown a willingness to throw his allies under the bus, and he\u2019s also threatening the existence of Canada. We are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North.\u201d<\/p>\nThings are bad, but that could be good for West Kitikmeot\u2019s Grays Bay Road and Port Project. The company has received dribs and drabs of federal funding over the years to conduct road feasibility studies and the like, but there are no bulldozers on the immediate horizon.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 6<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThe proposal to build a 230-kilometre all-weather road in the middle of a mineral-rich area of the central Arctic, one that would tie into ice roads and ultimately connect a proposed deepwater port, featuring a bunch of bells (maintenance sheds) and whistles (an airstrip), to Yellowknife and southern Canada requires some chicken-and-egg-type thinking.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>A polar bear walks along the ice flow in the Franklin Strait in the Northwest Passage. The passage, once impregnable, is now open to ship navigation in the summer and part of the fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key.<\/span> Photo by Jonathan Hayward<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nThe major mineral deposits \u2014 copper, zinc, gold and silver \u2014 do not need to be discovered. Mining companies have been aware of their existence for decades. Bell\u2019s contention is that if you build the main road, branch roads leading to new mines will follow as the economics of developing a mine go from, \u201cWe know the copper is there, but we just can\u2019t get to it,\u201d to, \u201cWe know the copper is there and we now have a way of getting it to market.\u201d<\/p>\nThe proposed deepwater port could also serve a dual purpose. After all, the Canadian navy is going to need somewhere to dock given that the Nanisivik Naval Facility, first announced by prime minister Stephen Harper in 2007 and repeatedly scaled back since then in scope and plagued by construction delays, including a sinking wharf and a lead contractor going bankrupt, as well as rife with boneheaded, impractical design elements, such as unheated fuel tanks, still doesn\u2019t have an opening date.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 7<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWere the Royal Canadian Navy to commit to a long-term lease agreement with West Kitikmeot, the company could take it as proof of future revenue in order to raise capital from the private sector in an arrangement Bell foresees being split 75-25 between public and private.<\/p>\nOn that front, he has been meeting with the Department of National Defence to understand the scope of the navy\u2019s needs. There is progress. Moving forward, a road could include a fibre-optic communications corridor and potentially even a liquefied natural gas pipeline.<\/p>\n\nNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along<\/p>\nBrendan Bell, CEO, West Kitikmeot Resources<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along; they\u2019re going to need something more concrete than that,\u201d he said. \u201cThat\u2019s really the next piece for us to solve.\u201d<\/p>\nOf course, the uncomfortable question is, how much is the road going to cost?<\/p>\nBell hesitates to give a hard number because the number he is working with is a projection based on a study from 2018, but he figures if you start at $1 billion, and throw in another $400 million or so for the port, then you would be on the right track.<\/p>\nBuilding anything in the Arctic is going to involve some sticker shock. Also required is a keen understanding that the ground beneath whatever gets built \u2014 a road, port, school, town or mine \u2014 may melt. Instead of the sort of bedrock structural engineers favour when sinking construction pilings, the Arctic, particularly the western portion, is filled with permafrost, or permanently frozen ground that is now in the process of permanently unfreezing at an alarming rate.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 8<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cWhen we talk about building in the Arctic, foundation designers have to start to consider how much overdesigning we are going to have to do to anticipate what a building will need in 30 years\u2019 time,\u201d Chris Burn, a physical geography professor at Carleton University, said. \u201cIf we build things to today\u2019s code, all is going to be well, it\u2019ll be just fine, but then in 15 years there\u2019s going to be a problem.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Brendan Bell, right, is chief executive of West Kitikmeot Resources Corp., an Inuit-owned company proposing to build a road and deepwater ocean port in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Handout<\/span> \/West Kitikmeot Resources Corp.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nBurn is a Brit and attended a series of lectures on permafrost as an undergraduate in the 1970s. Halfway through the second one, he knew what he wanted to do with his life, and the place to do it, at least for an English-speaking scholar, was the Canadian Arctic.<\/p>\nHe went on to become president of the International Permafrost Association for a time, and he is somewhat of a legend in Canadian Arctic permafrost research circles. He is also the guy that northerners call to consult with on building projects, including the Inuvik-Tuktoyaktuk Highway.<\/p>\nThe 138-kilometre, two-lane, all-weather gravel road tying the community of Tuktoyaktuk on the Arctic coast to the rest of Canada\u2019s road network opened in 2017. The price tag was $300 million and its completion allowed Canada, 150 years post-Confederation, to claim it was connected by road from coast to coast to coast.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 9<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBut beneath the proudly Canadian optics of tethering the country north to south was the chilling reality of building infrastructure in the permafrost zone.<\/p>\n\u201cThe ice in the ground is what holds the permafrost together,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nThink of the ice as the glue. A new, hypothetical four-storey building built to serve an equally new, hypothetical Arctic outpost would typically be built on pilings. Current engineering wisdom allows that once pilings are sunk in the permafrost, a building is effectively frozen in place. But as the permafrost thaws, and the glue unsticks, the building could be on the move: sinking, shifting or toppling over altogether.<\/p>\nRoads are even more dicey. Buildings have small footprints, but future Arctic roads will traverse multiple building environments and the amount of ice-glue in the ground will vary depending on the location, Burn said.<\/p>\nIn a landscape that is humming with, say, mining projects, the ice-glue will need to support the weight of industrial-scale trucks. As long as the glue sticks, all will be well, but should the glue lose its stickiness due to temperature increases, the road would be in big trouble and need substantial repairs while those who travel upon it could be put at grave risk.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 10<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\nWe’re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre<\/p>\nChris Burn, geography professor, Carleton University<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cKnowing the quantity of ice underneath the road is a really critical part of the information needed to design the road because the designers have to decide how they\u2019re going to keep that ice frozen,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nOne bright idea has been to refrigerate the permafrost. The Shakwak corridor is a critical stretch of the Alaska Highway connecting the state, via Yukon and British Columbia, to the lower 48 states. Canada and the U.S. have long co-operated in maintaining the highway, and a big chunk of that job in recent decades has been figuring out what to do about the thawing permafrost causing gargantuan potholes, bumps and cracks, as well as warping guardrails at the highway\u2019s edge.<\/p>\nThe community of Beaver Creek in western Yukon piloted a project involving thermosyphons: picture a white pipe stuck in the ground next to the road that is designed to vent heat from beneath the road while carrying cold back into the permafrost. The gadgets are a relatively low-tech way of addressing thawing permafrost, but low-tech should not be confused with inexpensive.<\/p>\n\u201cBeaver Creek\u2019s thermosyphon project cost $4 million and that was for 400 metres of road, which would work out to about $8 million per kilometre,\u201d Burn said. \u201cWe\u2019re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre. We don\u2019t do that in Canada.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 11<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nOn top of that, road maintenance in areas of thawing permafrost is already six times pricier than maintaining roads in areas where the permafrost \u201cis stable or absent,\u201d according to the Yukon government. Burn said more thawing permafrost is in the cards, so more Arctic architects, road designers, maintenance types and accountants will presumably be puzzling over what to do about it and how to budget for it.<\/p>\nTaken as a whole, a great, imagined Arctic infrastructure build-out might seem a bit daunting, but Canada has not always been afraid of dreaming big. Consider John Diefenbaker\u2019s Northern Vision.<\/p>\nThe country\u2019s so-called Prairie populist prime minister uncorked a barnburner of a speech before a packed house at the Winnipeg Civic Auditorium during a 1958 election campaign that his Conservatives went on to win in a blowout. Diefenbaker, whose oratorical chops were substantial, was never finer nor more fiery that day as he spoke of a \u201cnew\u201d Canada infused with a sense of national purpose and destiny.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, delivers remarks at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa in 2023. Obed said, while the Inuit are the first Canadians, they view themselves as Canadians first.<\/span> Photo by Spencer Colby<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cHow many of you here knew the pioneers in Western Canada?\u201d he said. \u201cI saw the early days here, here in Winnipeg in 1909, when the vast movement was taking place into the Western plains \u2014\u00a0they had imagination. There is a new imagination now. The Arctic.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 12<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThis new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\nIt should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\nIn reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Being mightily ticked at Trump and expressing your patriotism by buying Canadian products at the grocery store is a much more straightforward and inexpensive (relatively speaking) way of taking control of your fate than supercharging the economic development of the North. As the old saying goes, you need to start somewhere, but outside of a few mines dotted here and there, developing the North has barely begun at all despite decades of promises to make it happen.<\/p>\n
Whether the current generation can drum up the will and the cash to finally dig in and get big, ambitious projects done, ones that drive Arctic and national prosperity while safeguarding Canada from international bullies, could determine the country\u2019s long-term fate.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>The Americans have always understood the Northwest Passage as a security issue, which has meant keeping the Soviets, and now the Russians, away, said Rob Huebert, a political scientist at University of Calgary. With Donald Trump at the helm, that assumption has changed.<\/span> Photo by Larry Wong<\/span> \/Postmedia<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nIf that sounds alarmist, it is worth having a brief chat with Rob Huebert, a political scientist at the University of Calgary, about the Northwest Passage. In the days of yore, this shortcut between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans stoked the imagination of explorers, who would set off in search of an ice-free route and often get stuck in the ice.<\/p>\nNowadays, the passage is navigable for a stretch of time in the summer and fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key. Canada\u2019s position is that the Northwest Passage belongs to Canada. The Americans, to paraphrase, have long claimed the passage as international waters.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 5<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nIn practice, the disagreement between neighbours has been a remarkably polite affair. A U.S. ship has never entered the passage without first informing the Canadians what it is up to. Granted, Americans tell rather than ask for permission, but they also typically request a Canadian icebreaker be somewhere nearby in case they run into any problems with the ice.<\/p>\n\u201cThe Americans have always understood the Northwest Passage as a security issue, which has meant keeping the Soviets, and now the Russians, away,\u201d Huebert said.<\/p>\n\nWe are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North<\/p>\nRob Huebert, political scientist, University of Calgary<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nThe Americans have also historically done the heavy lifting in terms of keeping the Russians away, allowing Canada to blissfully flake out and, until last year, classify the Arctic as an \u201carea of exceptional\u201d peace, despite Russia having an extensive network of military bases and several nuclear-powered icebreakers at its disposal.<\/p>\n\u201cThe Russian threat is clearly understood,\u201d Huebert said. \u201cNow, all of a sudden, you get Trump back and he has shown a willingness to throw his allies under the bus, and he\u2019s also threatening the existence of Canada. We are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North.\u201d<\/p>\nThings are bad, but that could be good for West Kitikmeot\u2019s Grays Bay Road and Port Project. The company has received dribs and drabs of federal funding over the years to conduct road feasibility studies and the like, but there are no bulldozers on the immediate horizon.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 6<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThe proposal to build a 230-kilometre all-weather road in the middle of a mineral-rich area of the central Arctic, one that would tie into ice roads and ultimately connect a proposed deepwater port, featuring a bunch of bells (maintenance sheds) and whistles (an airstrip), to Yellowknife and southern Canada requires some chicken-and-egg-type thinking.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>A polar bear walks along the ice flow in the Franklin Strait in the Northwest Passage. The passage, once impregnable, is now open to ship navigation in the summer and part of the fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key.<\/span> Photo by Jonathan Hayward<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nThe major mineral deposits \u2014 copper, zinc, gold and silver \u2014 do not need to be discovered. Mining companies have been aware of their existence for decades. Bell\u2019s contention is that if you build the main road, branch roads leading to new mines will follow as the economics of developing a mine go from, \u201cWe know the copper is there, but we just can\u2019t get to it,\u201d to, \u201cWe know the copper is there and we now have a way of getting it to market.\u201d<\/p>\nThe proposed deepwater port could also serve a dual purpose. After all, the Canadian navy is going to need somewhere to dock given that the Nanisivik Naval Facility, first announced by prime minister Stephen Harper in 2007 and repeatedly scaled back since then in scope and plagued by construction delays, including a sinking wharf and a lead contractor going bankrupt, as well as rife with boneheaded, impractical design elements, such as unheated fuel tanks, still doesn\u2019t have an opening date.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 7<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWere the Royal Canadian Navy to commit to a long-term lease agreement with West Kitikmeot, the company could take it as proof of future revenue in order to raise capital from the private sector in an arrangement Bell foresees being split 75-25 between public and private.<\/p>\nOn that front, he has been meeting with the Department of National Defence to understand the scope of the navy\u2019s needs. There is progress. Moving forward, a road could include a fibre-optic communications corridor and potentially even a liquefied natural gas pipeline.<\/p>\n\nNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along<\/p>\nBrendan Bell, CEO, West Kitikmeot Resources<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along; they\u2019re going to need something more concrete than that,\u201d he said. \u201cThat\u2019s really the next piece for us to solve.\u201d<\/p>\nOf course, the uncomfortable question is, how much is the road going to cost?<\/p>\nBell hesitates to give a hard number because the number he is working with is a projection based on a study from 2018, but he figures if you start at $1 billion, and throw in another $400 million or so for the port, then you would be on the right track.<\/p>\nBuilding anything in the Arctic is going to involve some sticker shock. Also required is a keen understanding that the ground beneath whatever gets built \u2014 a road, port, school, town or mine \u2014 may melt. Instead of the sort of bedrock structural engineers favour when sinking construction pilings, the Arctic, particularly the western portion, is filled with permafrost, or permanently frozen ground that is now in the process of permanently unfreezing at an alarming rate.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 8<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cWhen we talk about building in the Arctic, foundation designers have to start to consider how much overdesigning we are going to have to do to anticipate what a building will need in 30 years\u2019 time,\u201d Chris Burn, a physical geography professor at Carleton University, said. \u201cIf we build things to today\u2019s code, all is going to be well, it\u2019ll be just fine, but then in 15 years there\u2019s going to be a problem.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Brendan Bell, right, is chief executive of West Kitikmeot Resources Corp., an Inuit-owned company proposing to build a road and deepwater ocean port in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Handout<\/span> \/West Kitikmeot Resources Corp.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nBurn is a Brit and attended a series of lectures on permafrost as an undergraduate in the 1970s. Halfway through the second one, he knew what he wanted to do with his life, and the place to do it, at least for an English-speaking scholar, was the Canadian Arctic.<\/p>\nHe went on to become president of the International Permafrost Association for a time, and he is somewhat of a legend in Canadian Arctic permafrost research circles. He is also the guy that northerners call to consult with on building projects, including the Inuvik-Tuktoyaktuk Highway.<\/p>\nThe 138-kilometre, two-lane, all-weather gravel road tying the community of Tuktoyaktuk on the Arctic coast to the rest of Canada\u2019s road network opened in 2017. The price tag was $300 million and its completion allowed Canada, 150 years post-Confederation, to claim it was connected by road from coast to coast to coast.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 9<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBut beneath the proudly Canadian optics of tethering the country north to south was the chilling reality of building infrastructure in the permafrost zone.<\/p>\n\u201cThe ice in the ground is what holds the permafrost together,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nThink of the ice as the glue. A new, hypothetical four-storey building built to serve an equally new, hypothetical Arctic outpost would typically be built on pilings. Current engineering wisdom allows that once pilings are sunk in the permafrost, a building is effectively frozen in place. But as the permafrost thaws, and the glue unsticks, the building could be on the move: sinking, shifting or toppling over altogether.<\/p>\nRoads are even more dicey. Buildings have small footprints, but future Arctic roads will traverse multiple building environments and the amount of ice-glue in the ground will vary depending on the location, Burn said.<\/p>\nIn a landscape that is humming with, say, mining projects, the ice-glue will need to support the weight of industrial-scale trucks. As long as the glue sticks, all will be well, but should the glue lose its stickiness due to temperature increases, the road would be in big trouble and need substantial repairs while those who travel upon it could be put at grave risk.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 10<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\nWe’re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre<\/p>\nChris Burn, geography professor, Carleton University<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cKnowing the quantity of ice underneath the road is a really critical part of the information needed to design the road because the designers have to decide how they\u2019re going to keep that ice frozen,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nOne bright idea has been to refrigerate the permafrost. The Shakwak corridor is a critical stretch of the Alaska Highway connecting the state, via Yukon and British Columbia, to the lower 48 states. Canada and the U.S. have long co-operated in maintaining the highway, and a big chunk of that job in recent decades has been figuring out what to do about the thawing permafrost causing gargantuan potholes, bumps and cracks, as well as warping guardrails at the highway\u2019s edge.<\/p>\nThe community of Beaver Creek in western Yukon piloted a project involving thermosyphons: picture a white pipe stuck in the ground next to the road that is designed to vent heat from beneath the road while carrying cold back into the permafrost. The gadgets are a relatively low-tech way of addressing thawing permafrost, but low-tech should not be confused with inexpensive.<\/p>\n\u201cBeaver Creek\u2019s thermosyphon project cost $4 million and that was for 400 metres of road, which would work out to about $8 million per kilometre,\u201d Burn said. \u201cWe\u2019re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre. We don\u2019t do that in Canada.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 11<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nOn top of that, road maintenance in areas of thawing permafrost is already six times pricier than maintaining roads in areas where the permafrost \u201cis stable or absent,\u201d according to the Yukon government. Burn said more thawing permafrost is in the cards, so more Arctic architects, road designers, maintenance types and accountants will presumably be puzzling over what to do about it and how to budget for it.<\/p>\nTaken as a whole, a great, imagined Arctic infrastructure build-out might seem a bit daunting, but Canada has not always been afraid of dreaming big. Consider John Diefenbaker\u2019s Northern Vision.<\/p>\nThe country\u2019s so-called Prairie populist prime minister uncorked a barnburner of a speech before a packed house at the Winnipeg Civic Auditorium during a 1958 election campaign that his Conservatives went on to win in a blowout. Diefenbaker, whose oratorical chops were substantial, was never finer nor more fiery that day as he spoke of a \u201cnew\u201d Canada infused with a sense of national purpose and destiny.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, delivers remarks at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa in 2023. Obed said, while the Inuit are the first Canadians, they view themselves as Canadians first.<\/span> Photo by Spencer Colby<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cHow many of you here knew the pioneers in Western Canada?\u201d he said. \u201cI saw the early days here, here in Winnipeg in 1909, when the vast movement was taking place into the Western plains \u2014\u00a0they had imagination. There is a new imagination now. The Arctic.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 12<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThis new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\nIt should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\nIn reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
If that sounds alarmist, it is worth having a brief chat with Rob Huebert, a political scientist at the University of Calgary, about the Northwest Passage. In the days of yore, this shortcut between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans stoked the imagination of explorers, who would set off in search of an ice-free route and often get stuck in the ice.<\/p>\n
Nowadays, the passage is navigable for a stretch of time in the summer and fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key. Canada\u2019s position is that the Northwest Passage belongs to Canada. The Americans, to paraphrase, have long claimed the passage as international waters.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n
Advertisement 5<\/p>\n
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nIn practice, the disagreement between neighbours has been a remarkably polite affair. A U.S. ship has never entered the passage without first informing the Canadians what it is up to. Granted, Americans tell rather than ask for permission, but they also typically request a Canadian icebreaker be somewhere nearby in case they run into any problems with the ice.<\/p>\n\u201cThe Americans have always understood the Northwest Passage as a security issue, which has meant keeping the Soviets, and now the Russians, away,\u201d Huebert said.<\/p>\n\nWe are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North<\/p>\nRob Huebert, political scientist, University of Calgary<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nThe Americans have also historically done the heavy lifting in terms of keeping the Russians away, allowing Canada to blissfully flake out and, until last year, classify the Arctic as an \u201carea of exceptional\u201d peace, despite Russia having an extensive network of military bases and several nuclear-powered icebreakers at its disposal.<\/p>\n\u201cThe Russian threat is clearly understood,\u201d Huebert said. \u201cNow, all of a sudden, you get Trump back and he has shown a willingness to throw his allies under the bus, and he\u2019s also threatening the existence of Canada. We are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North.\u201d<\/p>\nThings are bad, but that could be good for West Kitikmeot\u2019s Grays Bay Road and Port Project. The company has received dribs and drabs of federal funding over the years to conduct road feasibility studies and the like, but there are no bulldozers on the immediate horizon.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 6<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThe proposal to build a 230-kilometre all-weather road in the middle of a mineral-rich area of the central Arctic, one that would tie into ice roads and ultimately connect a proposed deepwater port, featuring a bunch of bells (maintenance sheds) and whistles (an airstrip), to Yellowknife and southern Canada requires some chicken-and-egg-type thinking.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>A polar bear walks along the ice flow in the Franklin Strait in the Northwest Passage. The passage, once impregnable, is now open to ship navigation in the summer and part of the fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key.<\/span> Photo by Jonathan Hayward<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nThe major mineral deposits \u2014 copper, zinc, gold and silver \u2014 do not need to be discovered. Mining companies have been aware of their existence for decades. Bell\u2019s contention is that if you build the main road, branch roads leading to new mines will follow as the economics of developing a mine go from, \u201cWe know the copper is there, but we just can\u2019t get to it,\u201d to, \u201cWe know the copper is there and we now have a way of getting it to market.\u201d<\/p>\nThe proposed deepwater port could also serve a dual purpose. After all, the Canadian navy is going to need somewhere to dock given that the Nanisivik Naval Facility, first announced by prime minister Stephen Harper in 2007 and repeatedly scaled back since then in scope and plagued by construction delays, including a sinking wharf and a lead contractor going bankrupt, as well as rife with boneheaded, impractical design elements, such as unheated fuel tanks, still doesn\u2019t have an opening date.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 7<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWere the Royal Canadian Navy to commit to a long-term lease agreement with West Kitikmeot, the company could take it as proof of future revenue in order to raise capital from the private sector in an arrangement Bell foresees being split 75-25 between public and private.<\/p>\nOn that front, he has been meeting with the Department of National Defence to understand the scope of the navy\u2019s needs. There is progress. Moving forward, a road could include a fibre-optic communications corridor and potentially even a liquefied natural gas pipeline.<\/p>\n\nNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along<\/p>\nBrendan Bell, CEO, West Kitikmeot Resources<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along; they\u2019re going to need something more concrete than that,\u201d he said. \u201cThat\u2019s really the next piece for us to solve.\u201d<\/p>\nOf course, the uncomfortable question is, how much is the road going to cost?<\/p>\nBell hesitates to give a hard number because the number he is working with is a projection based on a study from 2018, but he figures if you start at $1 billion, and throw in another $400 million or so for the port, then you would be on the right track.<\/p>\nBuilding anything in the Arctic is going to involve some sticker shock. Also required is a keen understanding that the ground beneath whatever gets built \u2014 a road, port, school, town or mine \u2014 may melt. Instead of the sort of bedrock structural engineers favour when sinking construction pilings, the Arctic, particularly the western portion, is filled with permafrost, or permanently frozen ground that is now in the process of permanently unfreezing at an alarming rate.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 8<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cWhen we talk about building in the Arctic, foundation designers have to start to consider how much overdesigning we are going to have to do to anticipate what a building will need in 30 years\u2019 time,\u201d Chris Burn, a physical geography professor at Carleton University, said. \u201cIf we build things to today\u2019s code, all is going to be well, it\u2019ll be just fine, but then in 15 years there\u2019s going to be a problem.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Brendan Bell, right, is chief executive of West Kitikmeot Resources Corp., an Inuit-owned company proposing to build a road and deepwater ocean port in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Handout<\/span> \/West Kitikmeot Resources Corp.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nBurn is a Brit and attended a series of lectures on permafrost as an undergraduate in the 1970s. Halfway through the second one, he knew what he wanted to do with his life, and the place to do it, at least for an English-speaking scholar, was the Canadian Arctic.<\/p>\nHe went on to become president of the International Permafrost Association for a time, and he is somewhat of a legend in Canadian Arctic permafrost research circles. He is also the guy that northerners call to consult with on building projects, including the Inuvik-Tuktoyaktuk Highway.<\/p>\nThe 138-kilometre, two-lane, all-weather gravel road tying the community of Tuktoyaktuk on the Arctic coast to the rest of Canada\u2019s road network opened in 2017. The price tag was $300 million and its completion allowed Canada, 150 years post-Confederation, to claim it was connected by road from coast to coast to coast.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 9<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBut beneath the proudly Canadian optics of tethering the country north to south was the chilling reality of building infrastructure in the permafrost zone.<\/p>\n\u201cThe ice in the ground is what holds the permafrost together,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nThink of the ice as the glue. A new, hypothetical four-storey building built to serve an equally new, hypothetical Arctic outpost would typically be built on pilings. Current engineering wisdom allows that once pilings are sunk in the permafrost, a building is effectively frozen in place. But as the permafrost thaws, and the glue unsticks, the building could be on the move: sinking, shifting or toppling over altogether.<\/p>\nRoads are even more dicey. Buildings have small footprints, but future Arctic roads will traverse multiple building environments and the amount of ice-glue in the ground will vary depending on the location, Burn said.<\/p>\nIn a landscape that is humming with, say, mining projects, the ice-glue will need to support the weight of industrial-scale trucks. As long as the glue sticks, all will be well, but should the glue lose its stickiness due to temperature increases, the road would be in big trouble and need substantial repairs while those who travel upon it could be put at grave risk.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 10<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\nWe’re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre<\/p>\nChris Burn, geography professor, Carleton University<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cKnowing the quantity of ice underneath the road is a really critical part of the information needed to design the road because the designers have to decide how they\u2019re going to keep that ice frozen,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nOne bright idea has been to refrigerate the permafrost. The Shakwak corridor is a critical stretch of the Alaska Highway connecting the state, via Yukon and British Columbia, to the lower 48 states. Canada and the U.S. have long co-operated in maintaining the highway, and a big chunk of that job in recent decades has been figuring out what to do about the thawing permafrost causing gargantuan potholes, bumps and cracks, as well as warping guardrails at the highway\u2019s edge.<\/p>\nThe community of Beaver Creek in western Yukon piloted a project involving thermosyphons: picture a white pipe stuck in the ground next to the road that is designed to vent heat from beneath the road while carrying cold back into the permafrost. The gadgets are a relatively low-tech way of addressing thawing permafrost, but low-tech should not be confused with inexpensive.<\/p>\n\u201cBeaver Creek\u2019s thermosyphon project cost $4 million and that was for 400 metres of road, which would work out to about $8 million per kilometre,\u201d Burn said. \u201cWe\u2019re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre. We don\u2019t do that in Canada.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 11<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nOn top of that, road maintenance in areas of thawing permafrost is already six times pricier than maintaining roads in areas where the permafrost \u201cis stable or absent,\u201d according to the Yukon government. Burn said more thawing permafrost is in the cards, so more Arctic architects, road designers, maintenance types and accountants will presumably be puzzling over what to do about it and how to budget for it.<\/p>\nTaken as a whole, a great, imagined Arctic infrastructure build-out might seem a bit daunting, but Canada has not always been afraid of dreaming big. Consider John Diefenbaker\u2019s Northern Vision.<\/p>\nThe country\u2019s so-called Prairie populist prime minister uncorked a barnburner of a speech before a packed house at the Winnipeg Civic Auditorium during a 1958 election campaign that his Conservatives went on to win in a blowout. Diefenbaker, whose oratorical chops were substantial, was never finer nor more fiery that day as he spoke of a \u201cnew\u201d Canada infused with a sense of national purpose and destiny.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, delivers remarks at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa in 2023. Obed said, while the Inuit are the first Canadians, they view themselves as Canadians first.<\/span> Photo by Spencer Colby<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cHow many of you here knew the pioneers in Western Canada?\u201d he said. \u201cI saw the early days here, here in Winnipeg in 1909, when the vast movement was taking place into the Western plains \u2014\u00a0they had imagination. There is a new imagination now. The Arctic.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 12<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThis new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\nIt should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\nIn reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In practice, the disagreement between neighbours has been a remarkably polite affair. A U.S. ship has never entered the passage without first informing the Canadians what it is up to. Granted, Americans tell rather than ask for permission, but they also typically request a Canadian icebreaker be somewhere nearby in case they run into any problems with the ice.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe Americans have always understood the Northwest Passage as a security issue, which has meant keeping the Soviets, and now the Russians, away,\u201d Huebert said.<\/p>\n
\nWe are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North<\/p>\nRob Huebert, political scientist, University of Calgary<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nThe Americans have also historically done the heavy lifting in terms of keeping the Russians away, allowing Canada to blissfully flake out and, until last year, classify the Arctic as an \u201carea of exceptional\u201d peace, despite Russia having an extensive network of military bases and several nuclear-powered icebreakers at its disposal.<\/p>\n\u201cThe Russian threat is clearly understood,\u201d Huebert said. \u201cNow, all of a sudden, you get Trump back and he has shown a willingness to throw his allies under the bus, and he\u2019s also threatening the existence of Canada. We are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North.\u201d<\/p>\nThings are bad, but that could be good for West Kitikmeot\u2019s Grays Bay Road and Port Project. The company has received dribs and drabs of federal funding over the years to conduct road feasibility studies and the like, but there are no bulldozers on the immediate horizon.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 6<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThe proposal to build a 230-kilometre all-weather road in the middle of a mineral-rich area of the central Arctic, one that would tie into ice roads and ultimately connect a proposed deepwater port, featuring a bunch of bells (maintenance sheds) and whistles (an airstrip), to Yellowknife and southern Canada requires some chicken-and-egg-type thinking.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>A polar bear walks along the ice flow in the Franklin Strait in the Northwest Passage. The passage, once impregnable, is now open to ship navigation in the summer and part of the fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key.<\/span> Photo by Jonathan Hayward<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nThe major mineral deposits \u2014 copper, zinc, gold and silver \u2014 do not need to be discovered. Mining companies have been aware of their existence for decades. Bell\u2019s contention is that if you build the main road, branch roads leading to new mines will follow as the economics of developing a mine go from, \u201cWe know the copper is there, but we just can\u2019t get to it,\u201d to, \u201cWe know the copper is there and we now have a way of getting it to market.\u201d<\/p>\nThe proposed deepwater port could also serve a dual purpose. After all, the Canadian navy is going to need somewhere to dock given that the Nanisivik Naval Facility, first announced by prime minister Stephen Harper in 2007 and repeatedly scaled back since then in scope and plagued by construction delays, including a sinking wharf and a lead contractor going bankrupt, as well as rife with boneheaded, impractical design elements, such as unheated fuel tanks, still doesn\u2019t have an opening date.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 7<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWere the Royal Canadian Navy to commit to a long-term lease agreement with West Kitikmeot, the company could take it as proof of future revenue in order to raise capital from the private sector in an arrangement Bell foresees being split 75-25 between public and private.<\/p>\nOn that front, he has been meeting with the Department of National Defence to understand the scope of the navy\u2019s needs. There is progress. Moving forward, a road could include a fibre-optic communications corridor and potentially even a liquefied natural gas pipeline.<\/p>\n\nNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along<\/p>\nBrendan Bell, CEO, West Kitikmeot Resources<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along; they\u2019re going to need something more concrete than that,\u201d he said. \u201cThat\u2019s really the next piece for us to solve.\u201d<\/p>\nOf course, the uncomfortable question is, how much is the road going to cost?<\/p>\nBell hesitates to give a hard number because the number he is working with is a projection based on a study from 2018, but he figures if you start at $1 billion, and throw in another $400 million or so for the port, then you would be on the right track.<\/p>\nBuilding anything in the Arctic is going to involve some sticker shock. Also required is a keen understanding that the ground beneath whatever gets built \u2014 a road, port, school, town or mine \u2014 may melt. Instead of the sort of bedrock structural engineers favour when sinking construction pilings, the Arctic, particularly the western portion, is filled with permafrost, or permanently frozen ground that is now in the process of permanently unfreezing at an alarming rate.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 8<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cWhen we talk about building in the Arctic, foundation designers have to start to consider how much overdesigning we are going to have to do to anticipate what a building will need in 30 years\u2019 time,\u201d Chris Burn, a physical geography professor at Carleton University, said. \u201cIf we build things to today\u2019s code, all is going to be well, it\u2019ll be just fine, but then in 15 years there\u2019s going to be a problem.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Brendan Bell, right, is chief executive of West Kitikmeot Resources Corp., an Inuit-owned company proposing to build a road and deepwater ocean port in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Handout<\/span> \/West Kitikmeot Resources Corp.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nBurn is a Brit and attended a series of lectures on permafrost as an undergraduate in the 1970s. Halfway through the second one, he knew what he wanted to do with his life, and the place to do it, at least for an English-speaking scholar, was the Canadian Arctic.<\/p>\nHe went on to become president of the International Permafrost Association for a time, and he is somewhat of a legend in Canadian Arctic permafrost research circles. He is also the guy that northerners call to consult with on building projects, including the Inuvik-Tuktoyaktuk Highway.<\/p>\nThe 138-kilometre, two-lane, all-weather gravel road tying the community of Tuktoyaktuk on the Arctic coast to the rest of Canada\u2019s road network opened in 2017. The price tag was $300 million and its completion allowed Canada, 150 years post-Confederation, to claim it was connected by road from coast to coast to coast.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 9<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBut beneath the proudly Canadian optics of tethering the country north to south was the chilling reality of building infrastructure in the permafrost zone.<\/p>\n\u201cThe ice in the ground is what holds the permafrost together,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nThink of the ice as the glue. A new, hypothetical four-storey building built to serve an equally new, hypothetical Arctic outpost would typically be built on pilings. Current engineering wisdom allows that once pilings are sunk in the permafrost, a building is effectively frozen in place. But as the permafrost thaws, and the glue unsticks, the building could be on the move: sinking, shifting or toppling over altogether.<\/p>\nRoads are even more dicey. Buildings have small footprints, but future Arctic roads will traverse multiple building environments and the amount of ice-glue in the ground will vary depending on the location, Burn said.<\/p>\nIn a landscape that is humming with, say, mining projects, the ice-glue will need to support the weight of industrial-scale trucks. As long as the glue sticks, all will be well, but should the glue lose its stickiness due to temperature increases, the road would be in big trouble and need substantial repairs while those who travel upon it could be put at grave risk.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 10<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\nWe’re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre<\/p>\nChris Burn, geography professor, Carleton University<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cKnowing the quantity of ice underneath the road is a really critical part of the information needed to design the road because the designers have to decide how they\u2019re going to keep that ice frozen,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nOne bright idea has been to refrigerate the permafrost. The Shakwak corridor is a critical stretch of the Alaska Highway connecting the state, via Yukon and British Columbia, to the lower 48 states. Canada and the U.S. have long co-operated in maintaining the highway, and a big chunk of that job in recent decades has been figuring out what to do about the thawing permafrost causing gargantuan potholes, bumps and cracks, as well as warping guardrails at the highway\u2019s edge.<\/p>\nThe community of Beaver Creek in western Yukon piloted a project involving thermosyphons: picture a white pipe stuck in the ground next to the road that is designed to vent heat from beneath the road while carrying cold back into the permafrost. The gadgets are a relatively low-tech way of addressing thawing permafrost, but low-tech should not be confused with inexpensive.<\/p>\n\u201cBeaver Creek\u2019s thermosyphon project cost $4 million and that was for 400 metres of road, which would work out to about $8 million per kilometre,\u201d Burn said. \u201cWe\u2019re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre. We don\u2019t do that in Canada.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 11<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nOn top of that, road maintenance in areas of thawing permafrost is already six times pricier than maintaining roads in areas where the permafrost \u201cis stable or absent,\u201d according to the Yukon government. Burn said more thawing permafrost is in the cards, so more Arctic architects, road designers, maintenance types and accountants will presumably be puzzling over what to do about it and how to budget for it.<\/p>\nTaken as a whole, a great, imagined Arctic infrastructure build-out might seem a bit daunting, but Canada has not always been afraid of dreaming big. Consider John Diefenbaker\u2019s Northern Vision.<\/p>\nThe country\u2019s so-called Prairie populist prime minister uncorked a barnburner of a speech before a packed house at the Winnipeg Civic Auditorium during a 1958 election campaign that his Conservatives went on to win in a blowout. Diefenbaker, whose oratorical chops were substantial, was never finer nor more fiery that day as he spoke of a \u201cnew\u201d Canada infused with a sense of national purpose and destiny.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, delivers remarks at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa in 2023. Obed said, while the Inuit are the first Canadians, they view themselves as Canadians first.<\/span> Photo by Spencer Colby<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cHow many of you here knew the pioneers in Western Canada?\u201d he said. \u201cI saw the early days here, here in Winnipeg in 1909, when the vast movement was taking place into the Western plains \u2014\u00a0they had imagination. There is a new imagination now. The Arctic.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 12<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThis new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\nIt should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\nIn reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
We are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North<\/p>\n
Rob Huebert, political scientist, University of Calgary<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
The Americans have also historically done the heavy lifting in terms of keeping the Russians away, allowing Canada to blissfully flake out and, until last year, classify the Arctic as an \u201carea of exceptional\u201d peace, despite Russia having an extensive network of military bases and several nuclear-powered icebreakers at its disposal.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe Russian threat is clearly understood,\u201d Huebert said. \u201cNow, all of a sudden, you get Trump back and he has shown a willingness to throw his allies under the bus, and he\u2019s also threatening the existence of Canada. We are now in a situation where we are completely exposed in the North.\u201d<\/p>\n
Things are bad, but that could be good for West Kitikmeot\u2019s Grays Bay Road and Port Project. The company has received dribs and drabs of federal funding over the years to conduct road feasibility studies and the like, but there are no bulldozers on the immediate horizon.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n
Advertisement 6<\/p>\n
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThe proposal to build a 230-kilometre all-weather road in the middle of a mineral-rich area of the central Arctic, one that would tie into ice roads and ultimately connect a proposed deepwater port, featuring a bunch of bells (maintenance sheds) and whistles (an airstrip), to Yellowknife and southern Canada requires some chicken-and-egg-type thinking.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>A polar bear walks along the ice flow in the Franklin Strait in the Northwest Passage. The passage, once impregnable, is now open to ship navigation in the summer and part of the fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key.<\/span> Photo by Jonathan Hayward<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nThe major mineral deposits \u2014 copper, zinc, gold and silver \u2014 do not need to be discovered. Mining companies have been aware of their existence for decades. Bell\u2019s contention is that if you build the main road, branch roads leading to new mines will follow as the economics of developing a mine go from, \u201cWe know the copper is there, but we just can\u2019t get to it,\u201d to, \u201cWe know the copper is there and we now have a way of getting it to market.\u201d<\/p>\nThe proposed deepwater port could also serve a dual purpose. After all, the Canadian navy is going to need somewhere to dock given that the Nanisivik Naval Facility, first announced by prime minister Stephen Harper in 2007 and repeatedly scaled back since then in scope and plagued by construction delays, including a sinking wharf and a lead contractor going bankrupt, as well as rife with boneheaded, impractical design elements, such as unheated fuel tanks, still doesn\u2019t have an opening date.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 7<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWere the Royal Canadian Navy to commit to a long-term lease agreement with West Kitikmeot, the company could take it as proof of future revenue in order to raise capital from the private sector in an arrangement Bell foresees being split 75-25 between public and private.<\/p>\nOn that front, he has been meeting with the Department of National Defence to understand the scope of the navy\u2019s needs. There is progress. Moving forward, a road could include a fibre-optic communications corridor and potentially even a liquefied natural gas pipeline.<\/p>\n\nNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along<\/p>\nBrendan Bell, CEO, West Kitikmeot Resources<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along; they\u2019re going to need something more concrete than that,\u201d he said. \u201cThat\u2019s really the next piece for us to solve.\u201d<\/p>\nOf course, the uncomfortable question is, how much is the road going to cost?<\/p>\nBell hesitates to give a hard number because the number he is working with is a projection based on a study from 2018, but he figures if you start at $1 billion, and throw in another $400 million or so for the port, then you would be on the right track.<\/p>\nBuilding anything in the Arctic is going to involve some sticker shock. Also required is a keen understanding that the ground beneath whatever gets built \u2014 a road, port, school, town or mine \u2014 may melt. Instead of the sort of bedrock structural engineers favour when sinking construction pilings, the Arctic, particularly the western portion, is filled with permafrost, or permanently frozen ground that is now in the process of permanently unfreezing at an alarming rate.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 8<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cWhen we talk about building in the Arctic, foundation designers have to start to consider how much overdesigning we are going to have to do to anticipate what a building will need in 30 years\u2019 time,\u201d Chris Burn, a physical geography professor at Carleton University, said. \u201cIf we build things to today\u2019s code, all is going to be well, it\u2019ll be just fine, but then in 15 years there\u2019s going to be a problem.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Brendan Bell, right, is chief executive of West Kitikmeot Resources Corp., an Inuit-owned company proposing to build a road and deepwater ocean port in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Handout<\/span> \/West Kitikmeot Resources Corp.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nBurn is a Brit and attended a series of lectures on permafrost as an undergraduate in the 1970s. Halfway through the second one, he knew what he wanted to do with his life, and the place to do it, at least for an English-speaking scholar, was the Canadian Arctic.<\/p>\nHe went on to become president of the International Permafrost Association for a time, and he is somewhat of a legend in Canadian Arctic permafrost research circles. He is also the guy that northerners call to consult with on building projects, including the Inuvik-Tuktoyaktuk Highway.<\/p>\nThe 138-kilometre, two-lane, all-weather gravel road tying the community of Tuktoyaktuk on the Arctic coast to the rest of Canada\u2019s road network opened in 2017. The price tag was $300 million and its completion allowed Canada, 150 years post-Confederation, to claim it was connected by road from coast to coast to coast.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 9<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBut beneath the proudly Canadian optics of tethering the country north to south was the chilling reality of building infrastructure in the permafrost zone.<\/p>\n\u201cThe ice in the ground is what holds the permafrost together,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nThink of the ice as the glue. A new, hypothetical four-storey building built to serve an equally new, hypothetical Arctic outpost would typically be built on pilings. Current engineering wisdom allows that once pilings are sunk in the permafrost, a building is effectively frozen in place. But as the permafrost thaws, and the glue unsticks, the building could be on the move: sinking, shifting or toppling over altogether.<\/p>\nRoads are even more dicey. Buildings have small footprints, but future Arctic roads will traverse multiple building environments and the amount of ice-glue in the ground will vary depending on the location, Burn said.<\/p>\nIn a landscape that is humming with, say, mining projects, the ice-glue will need to support the weight of industrial-scale trucks. As long as the glue sticks, all will be well, but should the glue lose its stickiness due to temperature increases, the road would be in big trouble and need substantial repairs while those who travel upon it could be put at grave risk.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 10<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\nWe’re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre<\/p>\nChris Burn, geography professor, Carleton University<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cKnowing the quantity of ice underneath the road is a really critical part of the information needed to design the road because the designers have to decide how they\u2019re going to keep that ice frozen,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nOne bright idea has been to refrigerate the permafrost. The Shakwak corridor is a critical stretch of the Alaska Highway connecting the state, via Yukon and British Columbia, to the lower 48 states. Canada and the U.S. have long co-operated in maintaining the highway, and a big chunk of that job in recent decades has been figuring out what to do about the thawing permafrost causing gargantuan potholes, bumps and cracks, as well as warping guardrails at the highway\u2019s edge.<\/p>\nThe community of Beaver Creek in western Yukon piloted a project involving thermosyphons: picture a white pipe stuck in the ground next to the road that is designed to vent heat from beneath the road while carrying cold back into the permafrost. The gadgets are a relatively low-tech way of addressing thawing permafrost, but low-tech should not be confused with inexpensive.<\/p>\n\u201cBeaver Creek\u2019s thermosyphon project cost $4 million and that was for 400 metres of road, which would work out to about $8 million per kilometre,\u201d Burn said. \u201cWe\u2019re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre. We don\u2019t do that in Canada.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 11<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nOn top of that, road maintenance in areas of thawing permafrost is already six times pricier than maintaining roads in areas where the permafrost \u201cis stable or absent,\u201d according to the Yukon government. Burn said more thawing permafrost is in the cards, so more Arctic architects, road designers, maintenance types and accountants will presumably be puzzling over what to do about it and how to budget for it.<\/p>\nTaken as a whole, a great, imagined Arctic infrastructure build-out might seem a bit daunting, but Canada has not always been afraid of dreaming big. Consider John Diefenbaker\u2019s Northern Vision.<\/p>\nThe country\u2019s so-called Prairie populist prime minister uncorked a barnburner of a speech before a packed house at the Winnipeg Civic Auditorium during a 1958 election campaign that his Conservatives went on to win in a blowout. Diefenbaker, whose oratorical chops were substantial, was never finer nor more fiery that day as he spoke of a \u201cnew\u201d Canada infused with a sense of national purpose and destiny.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, delivers remarks at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa in 2023. Obed said, while the Inuit are the first Canadians, they view themselves as Canadians first.<\/span> Photo by Spencer Colby<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cHow many of you here knew the pioneers in Western Canada?\u201d he said. \u201cI saw the early days here, here in Winnipeg in 1909, when the vast movement was taking place into the Western plains \u2014\u00a0they had imagination. There is a new imagination now. The Arctic.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 12<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThis new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\nIt should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\nIn reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The proposal to build a 230-kilometre all-weather road in the middle of a mineral-rich area of the central Arctic, one that would tie into ice roads and ultimately connect a proposed deepwater port, featuring a bunch of bells (maintenance sheds) and whistles (an airstrip), to Yellowknife and southern Canada requires some chicken-and-egg-type thinking.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>A polar bear walks along the ice flow in the Franklin Strait in the Northwest Passage. The passage, once impregnable, is now open to ship navigation in the summer and part of the fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key.<\/span> Photo by Jonathan Hayward<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nThe major mineral deposits \u2014 copper, zinc, gold and silver \u2014 do not need to be discovered. Mining companies have been aware of their existence for decades. Bell\u2019s contention is that if you build the main road, branch roads leading to new mines will follow as the economics of developing a mine go from, \u201cWe know the copper is there, but we just can\u2019t get to it,\u201d to, \u201cWe know the copper is there and we now have a way of getting it to market.\u201d<\/p>\nThe proposed deepwater port could also serve a dual purpose. After all, the Canadian navy is going to need somewhere to dock given that the Nanisivik Naval Facility, first announced by prime minister Stephen Harper in 2007 and repeatedly scaled back since then in scope and plagued by construction delays, including a sinking wharf and a lead contractor going bankrupt, as well as rife with boneheaded, impractical design elements, such as unheated fuel tanks, still doesn\u2019t have an opening date.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 7<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWere the Royal Canadian Navy to commit to a long-term lease agreement with West Kitikmeot, the company could take it as proof of future revenue in order to raise capital from the private sector in an arrangement Bell foresees being split 75-25 between public and private.<\/p>\nOn that front, he has been meeting with the Department of National Defence to understand the scope of the navy\u2019s needs. There is progress. Moving forward, a road could include a fibre-optic communications corridor and potentially even a liquefied natural gas pipeline.<\/p>\n\nNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along<\/p>\nBrendan Bell, CEO, West Kitikmeot Resources<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along; they\u2019re going to need something more concrete than that,\u201d he said. \u201cThat\u2019s really the next piece for us to solve.\u201d<\/p>\nOf course, the uncomfortable question is, how much is the road going to cost?<\/p>\nBell hesitates to give a hard number because the number he is working with is a projection based on a study from 2018, but he figures if you start at $1 billion, and throw in another $400 million or so for the port, then you would be on the right track.<\/p>\nBuilding anything in the Arctic is going to involve some sticker shock. Also required is a keen understanding that the ground beneath whatever gets built \u2014 a road, port, school, town or mine \u2014 may melt. Instead of the sort of bedrock structural engineers favour when sinking construction pilings, the Arctic, particularly the western portion, is filled with permafrost, or permanently frozen ground that is now in the process of permanently unfreezing at an alarming rate.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 8<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cWhen we talk about building in the Arctic, foundation designers have to start to consider how much overdesigning we are going to have to do to anticipate what a building will need in 30 years\u2019 time,\u201d Chris Burn, a physical geography professor at Carleton University, said. \u201cIf we build things to today\u2019s code, all is going to be well, it\u2019ll be just fine, but then in 15 years there\u2019s going to be a problem.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Brendan Bell, right, is chief executive of West Kitikmeot Resources Corp., an Inuit-owned company proposing to build a road and deepwater ocean port in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Handout<\/span> \/West Kitikmeot Resources Corp.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nBurn is a Brit and attended a series of lectures on permafrost as an undergraduate in the 1970s. Halfway through the second one, he knew what he wanted to do with his life, and the place to do it, at least for an English-speaking scholar, was the Canadian Arctic.<\/p>\nHe went on to become president of the International Permafrost Association for a time, and he is somewhat of a legend in Canadian Arctic permafrost research circles. He is also the guy that northerners call to consult with on building projects, including the Inuvik-Tuktoyaktuk Highway.<\/p>\nThe 138-kilometre, two-lane, all-weather gravel road tying the community of Tuktoyaktuk on the Arctic coast to the rest of Canada\u2019s road network opened in 2017. The price tag was $300 million and its completion allowed Canada, 150 years post-Confederation, to claim it was connected by road from coast to coast to coast.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 9<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBut beneath the proudly Canadian optics of tethering the country north to south was the chilling reality of building infrastructure in the permafrost zone.<\/p>\n\u201cThe ice in the ground is what holds the permafrost together,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nThink of the ice as the glue. A new, hypothetical four-storey building built to serve an equally new, hypothetical Arctic outpost would typically be built on pilings. Current engineering wisdom allows that once pilings are sunk in the permafrost, a building is effectively frozen in place. But as the permafrost thaws, and the glue unsticks, the building could be on the move: sinking, shifting or toppling over altogether.<\/p>\nRoads are even more dicey. Buildings have small footprints, but future Arctic roads will traverse multiple building environments and the amount of ice-glue in the ground will vary depending on the location, Burn said.<\/p>\nIn a landscape that is humming with, say, mining projects, the ice-glue will need to support the weight of industrial-scale trucks. As long as the glue sticks, all will be well, but should the glue lose its stickiness due to temperature increases, the road would be in big trouble and need substantial repairs while those who travel upon it could be put at grave risk.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 10<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\nWe’re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre<\/p>\nChris Burn, geography professor, Carleton University<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cKnowing the quantity of ice underneath the road is a really critical part of the information needed to design the road because the designers have to decide how they\u2019re going to keep that ice frozen,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nOne bright idea has been to refrigerate the permafrost. The Shakwak corridor is a critical stretch of the Alaska Highway connecting the state, via Yukon and British Columbia, to the lower 48 states. Canada and the U.S. have long co-operated in maintaining the highway, and a big chunk of that job in recent decades has been figuring out what to do about the thawing permafrost causing gargantuan potholes, bumps and cracks, as well as warping guardrails at the highway\u2019s edge.<\/p>\nThe community of Beaver Creek in western Yukon piloted a project involving thermosyphons: picture a white pipe stuck in the ground next to the road that is designed to vent heat from beneath the road while carrying cold back into the permafrost. The gadgets are a relatively low-tech way of addressing thawing permafrost, but low-tech should not be confused with inexpensive.<\/p>\n\u201cBeaver Creek\u2019s thermosyphon project cost $4 million and that was for 400 metres of road, which would work out to about $8 million per kilometre,\u201d Burn said. \u201cWe\u2019re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre. We don\u2019t do that in Canada.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 11<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nOn top of that, road maintenance in areas of thawing permafrost is already six times pricier than maintaining roads in areas where the permafrost \u201cis stable or absent,\u201d according to the Yukon government. Burn said more thawing permafrost is in the cards, so more Arctic architects, road designers, maintenance types and accountants will presumably be puzzling over what to do about it and how to budget for it.<\/p>\nTaken as a whole, a great, imagined Arctic infrastructure build-out might seem a bit daunting, but Canada has not always been afraid of dreaming big. Consider John Diefenbaker\u2019s Northern Vision.<\/p>\nThe country\u2019s so-called Prairie populist prime minister uncorked a barnburner of a speech before a packed house at the Winnipeg Civic Auditorium during a 1958 election campaign that his Conservatives went on to win in a blowout. Diefenbaker, whose oratorical chops were substantial, was never finer nor more fiery that day as he spoke of a \u201cnew\u201d Canada infused with a sense of national purpose and destiny.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, delivers remarks at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa in 2023. Obed said, while the Inuit are the first Canadians, they view themselves as Canadians first.<\/span> Photo by Spencer Colby<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cHow many of you here knew the pioneers in Western Canada?\u201d he said. \u201cI saw the early days here, here in Winnipeg in 1909, when the vast movement was taking place into the Western plains \u2014\u00a0they had imagination. There is a new imagination now. The Arctic.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 12<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThis new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\nIt should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\nIn reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Article content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>A polar bear walks along the ice flow in the Franklin Strait in the Northwest Passage. The passage, once impregnable, is now open to ship navigation in the summer and part of the fall. The theory holds that as the world warms up and more sea ice melts, the passage will become an increasingly attractive shipping lane, so controlling it is key.<\/span> Photo by Jonathan Hayward<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nThe major mineral deposits \u2014 copper, zinc, gold and silver \u2014 do not need to be discovered. Mining companies have been aware of their existence for decades. Bell\u2019s contention is that if you build the main road, branch roads leading to new mines will follow as the economics of developing a mine go from, \u201cWe know the copper is there, but we just can\u2019t get to it,\u201d to, \u201cWe know the copper is there and we now have a way of getting it to market.\u201d<\/p>\nThe proposed deepwater port could also serve a dual purpose. After all, the Canadian navy is going to need somewhere to dock given that the Nanisivik Naval Facility, first announced by prime minister Stephen Harper in 2007 and repeatedly scaled back since then in scope and plagued by construction delays, including a sinking wharf and a lead contractor going bankrupt, as well as rife with boneheaded, impractical design elements, such as unheated fuel tanks, still doesn\u2019t have an opening date.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 7<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWere the Royal Canadian Navy to commit to a long-term lease agreement with West Kitikmeot, the company could take it as proof of future revenue in order to raise capital from the private sector in an arrangement Bell foresees being split 75-25 between public and private.<\/p>\nOn that front, he has been meeting with the Department of National Defence to understand the scope of the navy\u2019s needs. There is progress. Moving forward, a road could include a fibre-optic communications corridor and potentially even a liquefied natural gas pipeline.<\/p>\n\nNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along<\/p>\nBrendan Bell, CEO, West Kitikmeot Resources<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along; they\u2019re going to need something more concrete than that,\u201d he said. \u201cThat\u2019s really the next piece for us to solve.\u201d<\/p>\nOf course, the uncomfortable question is, how much is the road going to cost?<\/p>\nBell hesitates to give a hard number because the number he is working with is a projection based on a study from 2018, but he figures if you start at $1 billion, and throw in another $400 million or so for the port, then you would be on the right track.<\/p>\nBuilding anything in the Arctic is going to involve some sticker shock. Also required is a keen understanding that the ground beneath whatever gets built \u2014 a road, port, school, town or mine \u2014 may melt. Instead of the sort of bedrock structural engineers favour when sinking construction pilings, the Arctic, particularly the western portion, is filled with permafrost, or permanently frozen ground that is now in the process of permanently unfreezing at an alarming rate.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 8<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cWhen we talk about building in the Arctic, foundation designers have to start to consider how much overdesigning we are going to have to do to anticipate what a building will need in 30 years\u2019 time,\u201d Chris Burn, a physical geography professor at Carleton University, said. \u201cIf we build things to today\u2019s code, all is going to be well, it\u2019ll be just fine, but then in 15 years there\u2019s going to be a problem.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Brendan Bell, right, is chief executive of West Kitikmeot Resources Corp., an Inuit-owned company proposing to build a road and deepwater ocean port in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Handout<\/span> \/West Kitikmeot Resources Corp.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nBurn is a Brit and attended a series of lectures on permafrost as an undergraduate in the 1970s. Halfway through the second one, he knew what he wanted to do with his life, and the place to do it, at least for an English-speaking scholar, was the Canadian Arctic.<\/p>\nHe went on to become president of the International Permafrost Association for a time, and he is somewhat of a legend in Canadian Arctic permafrost research circles. He is also the guy that northerners call to consult with on building projects, including the Inuvik-Tuktoyaktuk Highway.<\/p>\nThe 138-kilometre, two-lane, all-weather gravel road tying the community of Tuktoyaktuk on the Arctic coast to the rest of Canada\u2019s road network opened in 2017. The price tag was $300 million and its completion allowed Canada, 150 years post-Confederation, to claim it was connected by road from coast to coast to coast.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 9<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBut beneath the proudly Canadian optics of tethering the country north to south was the chilling reality of building infrastructure in the permafrost zone.<\/p>\n\u201cThe ice in the ground is what holds the permafrost together,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nThink of the ice as the glue. A new, hypothetical four-storey building built to serve an equally new, hypothetical Arctic outpost would typically be built on pilings. Current engineering wisdom allows that once pilings are sunk in the permafrost, a building is effectively frozen in place. But as the permafrost thaws, and the glue unsticks, the building could be on the move: sinking, shifting or toppling over altogether.<\/p>\nRoads are even more dicey. Buildings have small footprints, but future Arctic roads will traverse multiple building environments and the amount of ice-glue in the ground will vary depending on the location, Burn said.<\/p>\nIn a landscape that is humming with, say, mining projects, the ice-glue will need to support the weight of industrial-scale trucks. As long as the glue sticks, all will be well, but should the glue lose its stickiness due to temperature increases, the road would be in big trouble and need substantial repairs while those who travel upon it could be put at grave risk.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 10<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\nWe’re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre<\/p>\nChris Burn, geography professor, Carleton University<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cKnowing the quantity of ice underneath the road is a really critical part of the information needed to design the road because the designers have to decide how they\u2019re going to keep that ice frozen,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nOne bright idea has been to refrigerate the permafrost. The Shakwak corridor is a critical stretch of the Alaska Highway connecting the state, via Yukon and British Columbia, to the lower 48 states. Canada and the U.S. have long co-operated in maintaining the highway, and a big chunk of that job in recent decades has been figuring out what to do about the thawing permafrost causing gargantuan potholes, bumps and cracks, as well as warping guardrails at the highway\u2019s edge.<\/p>\nThe community of Beaver Creek in western Yukon piloted a project involving thermosyphons: picture a white pipe stuck in the ground next to the road that is designed to vent heat from beneath the road while carrying cold back into the permafrost. The gadgets are a relatively low-tech way of addressing thawing permafrost, but low-tech should not be confused with inexpensive.<\/p>\n\u201cBeaver Creek\u2019s thermosyphon project cost $4 million and that was for 400 metres of road, which would work out to about $8 million per kilometre,\u201d Burn said. \u201cWe\u2019re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre. We don\u2019t do that in Canada.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 11<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nOn top of that, road maintenance in areas of thawing permafrost is already six times pricier than maintaining roads in areas where the permafrost \u201cis stable or absent,\u201d according to the Yukon government. Burn said more thawing permafrost is in the cards, so more Arctic architects, road designers, maintenance types and accountants will presumably be puzzling over what to do about it and how to budget for it.<\/p>\nTaken as a whole, a great, imagined Arctic infrastructure build-out might seem a bit daunting, but Canada has not always been afraid of dreaming big. Consider John Diefenbaker\u2019s Northern Vision.<\/p>\nThe country\u2019s so-called Prairie populist prime minister uncorked a barnburner of a speech before a packed house at the Winnipeg Civic Auditorium during a 1958 election campaign that his Conservatives went on to win in a blowout. Diefenbaker, whose oratorical chops were substantial, was never finer nor more fiery that day as he spoke of a \u201cnew\u201d Canada infused with a sense of national purpose and destiny.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, delivers remarks at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa in 2023. Obed said, while the Inuit are the first Canadians, they view themselves as Canadians first.<\/span> Photo by Spencer Colby<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cHow many of you here knew the pioneers in Western Canada?\u201d he said. \u201cI saw the early days here, here in Winnipeg in 1909, when the vast movement was taking place into the Western plains \u2014\u00a0they had imagination. There is a new imagination now. The Arctic.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 12<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThis new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\nIt should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\nIn reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The major mineral deposits \u2014 copper, zinc, gold and silver \u2014 do not need to be discovered. Mining companies have been aware of their existence for decades. Bell\u2019s contention is that if you build the main road, branch roads leading to new mines will follow as the economics of developing a mine go from, \u201cWe know the copper is there, but we just can\u2019t get to it,\u201d to, \u201cWe know the copper is there and we now have a way of getting it to market.\u201d<\/p>\n
The proposed deepwater port could also serve a dual purpose. After all, the Canadian navy is going to need somewhere to dock given that the Nanisivik Naval Facility, first announced by prime minister Stephen Harper in 2007 and repeatedly scaled back since then in scope and plagued by construction delays, including a sinking wharf and a lead contractor going bankrupt, as well as rife with boneheaded, impractical design elements, such as unheated fuel tanks, still doesn\u2019t have an opening date.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n
Advertisement 7<\/p>\n
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWere the Royal Canadian Navy to commit to a long-term lease agreement with West Kitikmeot, the company could take it as proof of future revenue in order to raise capital from the private sector in an arrangement Bell foresees being split 75-25 between public and private.<\/p>\nOn that front, he has been meeting with the Department of National Defence to understand the scope of the navy\u2019s needs. There is progress. Moving forward, a road could include a fibre-optic communications corridor and potentially even a liquefied natural gas pipeline.<\/p>\n\nNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along<\/p>\nBrendan Bell, CEO, West Kitikmeot Resources<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along; they\u2019re going to need something more concrete than that,\u201d he said. \u201cThat\u2019s really the next piece for us to solve.\u201d<\/p>\nOf course, the uncomfortable question is, how much is the road going to cost?<\/p>\nBell hesitates to give a hard number because the number he is working with is a projection based on a study from 2018, but he figures if you start at $1 billion, and throw in another $400 million or so for the port, then you would be on the right track.<\/p>\nBuilding anything in the Arctic is going to involve some sticker shock. Also required is a keen understanding that the ground beneath whatever gets built \u2014 a road, port, school, town or mine \u2014 may melt. Instead of the sort of bedrock structural engineers favour when sinking construction pilings, the Arctic, particularly the western portion, is filled with permafrost, or permanently frozen ground that is now in the process of permanently unfreezing at an alarming rate.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 8<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cWhen we talk about building in the Arctic, foundation designers have to start to consider how much overdesigning we are going to have to do to anticipate what a building will need in 30 years\u2019 time,\u201d Chris Burn, a physical geography professor at Carleton University, said. \u201cIf we build things to today\u2019s code, all is going to be well, it\u2019ll be just fine, but then in 15 years there\u2019s going to be a problem.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Brendan Bell, right, is chief executive of West Kitikmeot Resources Corp., an Inuit-owned company proposing to build a road and deepwater ocean port in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Handout<\/span> \/West Kitikmeot Resources Corp.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nBurn is a Brit and attended a series of lectures on permafrost as an undergraduate in the 1970s. Halfway through the second one, he knew what he wanted to do with his life, and the place to do it, at least for an English-speaking scholar, was the Canadian Arctic.<\/p>\nHe went on to become president of the International Permafrost Association for a time, and he is somewhat of a legend in Canadian Arctic permafrost research circles. He is also the guy that northerners call to consult with on building projects, including the Inuvik-Tuktoyaktuk Highway.<\/p>\nThe 138-kilometre, two-lane, all-weather gravel road tying the community of Tuktoyaktuk on the Arctic coast to the rest of Canada\u2019s road network opened in 2017. The price tag was $300 million and its completion allowed Canada, 150 years post-Confederation, to claim it was connected by road from coast to coast to coast.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 9<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBut beneath the proudly Canadian optics of tethering the country north to south was the chilling reality of building infrastructure in the permafrost zone.<\/p>\n\u201cThe ice in the ground is what holds the permafrost together,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nThink of the ice as the glue. A new, hypothetical four-storey building built to serve an equally new, hypothetical Arctic outpost would typically be built on pilings. Current engineering wisdom allows that once pilings are sunk in the permafrost, a building is effectively frozen in place. But as the permafrost thaws, and the glue unsticks, the building could be on the move: sinking, shifting or toppling over altogether.<\/p>\nRoads are even more dicey. Buildings have small footprints, but future Arctic roads will traverse multiple building environments and the amount of ice-glue in the ground will vary depending on the location, Burn said.<\/p>\nIn a landscape that is humming with, say, mining projects, the ice-glue will need to support the weight of industrial-scale trucks. As long as the glue sticks, all will be well, but should the glue lose its stickiness due to temperature increases, the road would be in big trouble and need substantial repairs while those who travel upon it could be put at grave risk.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 10<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\nWe’re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre<\/p>\nChris Burn, geography professor, Carleton University<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cKnowing the quantity of ice underneath the road is a really critical part of the information needed to design the road because the designers have to decide how they\u2019re going to keep that ice frozen,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nOne bright idea has been to refrigerate the permafrost. The Shakwak corridor is a critical stretch of the Alaska Highway connecting the state, via Yukon and British Columbia, to the lower 48 states. Canada and the U.S. have long co-operated in maintaining the highway, and a big chunk of that job in recent decades has been figuring out what to do about the thawing permafrost causing gargantuan potholes, bumps and cracks, as well as warping guardrails at the highway\u2019s edge.<\/p>\nThe community of Beaver Creek in western Yukon piloted a project involving thermosyphons: picture a white pipe stuck in the ground next to the road that is designed to vent heat from beneath the road while carrying cold back into the permafrost. The gadgets are a relatively low-tech way of addressing thawing permafrost, but low-tech should not be confused with inexpensive.<\/p>\n\u201cBeaver Creek\u2019s thermosyphon project cost $4 million and that was for 400 metres of road, which would work out to about $8 million per kilometre,\u201d Burn said. \u201cWe\u2019re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre. We don\u2019t do that in Canada.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 11<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nOn top of that, road maintenance in areas of thawing permafrost is already six times pricier than maintaining roads in areas where the permafrost \u201cis stable or absent,\u201d according to the Yukon government. Burn said more thawing permafrost is in the cards, so more Arctic architects, road designers, maintenance types and accountants will presumably be puzzling over what to do about it and how to budget for it.<\/p>\nTaken as a whole, a great, imagined Arctic infrastructure build-out might seem a bit daunting, but Canada has not always been afraid of dreaming big. Consider John Diefenbaker\u2019s Northern Vision.<\/p>\nThe country\u2019s so-called Prairie populist prime minister uncorked a barnburner of a speech before a packed house at the Winnipeg Civic Auditorium during a 1958 election campaign that his Conservatives went on to win in a blowout. Diefenbaker, whose oratorical chops were substantial, was never finer nor more fiery that day as he spoke of a \u201cnew\u201d Canada infused with a sense of national purpose and destiny.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, delivers remarks at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa in 2023. Obed said, while the Inuit are the first Canadians, they view themselves as Canadians first.<\/span> Photo by Spencer Colby<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cHow many of you here knew the pioneers in Western Canada?\u201d he said. \u201cI saw the early days here, here in Winnipeg in 1909, when the vast movement was taking place into the Western plains \u2014\u00a0they had imagination. There is a new imagination now. The Arctic.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 12<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThis new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\nIt should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\nIn reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Were the Royal Canadian Navy to commit to a long-term lease agreement with West Kitikmeot, the company could take it as proof of future revenue in order to raise capital from the private sector in an arrangement Bell foresees being split 75-25 between public and private.<\/p>\n
On that front, he has been meeting with the Department of National Defence to understand the scope of the navy\u2019s needs. There is progress. Moving forward, a road could include a fibre-optic communications corridor and potentially even a liquefied natural gas pipeline.<\/p>\n
\nNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along<\/p>\nBrendan Bell, CEO, West Kitikmeot Resources<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along; they\u2019re going to need something more concrete than that,\u201d he said. \u201cThat\u2019s really the next piece for us to solve.\u201d<\/p>\nOf course, the uncomfortable question is, how much is the road going to cost?<\/p>\nBell hesitates to give a hard number because the number he is working with is a projection based on a study from 2018, but he figures if you start at $1 billion, and throw in another $400 million or so for the port, then you would be on the right track.<\/p>\nBuilding anything in the Arctic is going to involve some sticker shock. Also required is a keen understanding that the ground beneath whatever gets built \u2014 a road, port, school, town or mine \u2014 may melt. Instead of the sort of bedrock structural engineers favour when sinking construction pilings, the Arctic, particularly the western portion, is filled with permafrost, or permanently frozen ground that is now in the process of permanently unfreezing at an alarming rate.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 8<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cWhen we talk about building in the Arctic, foundation designers have to start to consider how much overdesigning we are going to have to do to anticipate what a building will need in 30 years\u2019 time,\u201d Chris Burn, a physical geography professor at Carleton University, said. \u201cIf we build things to today\u2019s code, all is going to be well, it\u2019ll be just fine, but then in 15 years there\u2019s going to be a problem.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Brendan Bell, right, is chief executive of West Kitikmeot Resources Corp., an Inuit-owned company proposing to build a road and deepwater ocean port in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Handout<\/span> \/West Kitikmeot Resources Corp.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nBurn is a Brit and attended a series of lectures on permafrost as an undergraduate in the 1970s. Halfway through the second one, he knew what he wanted to do with his life, and the place to do it, at least for an English-speaking scholar, was the Canadian Arctic.<\/p>\nHe went on to become president of the International Permafrost Association for a time, and he is somewhat of a legend in Canadian Arctic permafrost research circles. He is also the guy that northerners call to consult with on building projects, including the Inuvik-Tuktoyaktuk Highway.<\/p>\nThe 138-kilometre, two-lane, all-weather gravel road tying the community of Tuktoyaktuk on the Arctic coast to the rest of Canada\u2019s road network opened in 2017. The price tag was $300 million and its completion allowed Canada, 150 years post-Confederation, to claim it was connected by road from coast to coast to coast.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 9<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBut beneath the proudly Canadian optics of tethering the country north to south was the chilling reality of building infrastructure in the permafrost zone.<\/p>\n\u201cThe ice in the ground is what holds the permafrost together,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nThink of the ice as the glue. A new, hypothetical four-storey building built to serve an equally new, hypothetical Arctic outpost would typically be built on pilings. Current engineering wisdom allows that once pilings are sunk in the permafrost, a building is effectively frozen in place. But as the permafrost thaws, and the glue unsticks, the building could be on the move: sinking, shifting or toppling over altogether.<\/p>\nRoads are even more dicey. Buildings have small footprints, but future Arctic roads will traverse multiple building environments and the amount of ice-glue in the ground will vary depending on the location, Burn said.<\/p>\nIn a landscape that is humming with, say, mining projects, the ice-glue will need to support the weight of industrial-scale trucks. As long as the glue sticks, all will be well, but should the glue lose its stickiness due to temperature increases, the road would be in big trouble and need substantial repairs while those who travel upon it could be put at grave risk.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 10<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\nWe’re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre<\/p>\nChris Burn, geography professor, Carleton University<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cKnowing the quantity of ice underneath the road is a really critical part of the information needed to design the road because the designers have to decide how they\u2019re going to keep that ice frozen,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nOne bright idea has been to refrigerate the permafrost. The Shakwak corridor is a critical stretch of the Alaska Highway connecting the state, via Yukon and British Columbia, to the lower 48 states. Canada and the U.S. have long co-operated in maintaining the highway, and a big chunk of that job in recent decades has been figuring out what to do about the thawing permafrost causing gargantuan potholes, bumps and cracks, as well as warping guardrails at the highway\u2019s edge.<\/p>\nThe community of Beaver Creek in western Yukon piloted a project involving thermosyphons: picture a white pipe stuck in the ground next to the road that is designed to vent heat from beneath the road while carrying cold back into the permafrost. The gadgets are a relatively low-tech way of addressing thawing permafrost, but low-tech should not be confused with inexpensive.<\/p>\n\u201cBeaver Creek\u2019s thermosyphon project cost $4 million and that was for 400 metres of road, which would work out to about $8 million per kilometre,\u201d Burn said. \u201cWe\u2019re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre. We don\u2019t do that in Canada.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 11<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nOn top of that, road maintenance in areas of thawing permafrost is already six times pricier than maintaining roads in areas where the permafrost \u201cis stable or absent,\u201d according to the Yukon government. Burn said more thawing permafrost is in the cards, so more Arctic architects, road designers, maintenance types and accountants will presumably be puzzling over what to do about it and how to budget for it.<\/p>\nTaken as a whole, a great, imagined Arctic infrastructure build-out might seem a bit daunting, but Canada has not always been afraid of dreaming big. Consider John Diefenbaker\u2019s Northern Vision.<\/p>\nThe country\u2019s so-called Prairie populist prime minister uncorked a barnburner of a speech before a packed house at the Winnipeg Civic Auditorium during a 1958 election campaign that his Conservatives went on to win in a blowout. Diefenbaker, whose oratorical chops were substantial, was never finer nor more fiery that day as he spoke of a \u201cnew\u201d Canada infused with a sense of national purpose and destiny.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, delivers remarks at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa in 2023. Obed said, while the Inuit are the first Canadians, they view themselves as Canadians first.<\/span> Photo by Spencer Colby<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cHow many of you here knew the pioneers in Western Canada?\u201d he said. \u201cI saw the early days here, here in Winnipeg in 1909, when the vast movement was taking place into the Western plains \u2014\u00a0they had imagination. There is a new imagination now. The Arctic.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 12<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThis new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\nIt should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\nIn reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Nobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along<\/p>\n
Brendan Bell, CEO, West Kitikmeot Resources<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\u201cNobody is going to make an investment privately on speculation that mines in the future will come along; they\u2019re going to need something more concrete than that,\u201d he said. \u201cThat\u2019s really the next piece for us to solve.\u201d<\/p>\n
Of course, the uncomfortable question is, how much is the road going to cost?<\/p>\n
Bell hesitates to give a hard number because the number he is working with is a projection based on a study from 2018, but he figures if you start at $1 billion, and throw in another $400 million or so for the port, then you would be on the right track.<\/p>\n
Building anything in the Arctic is going to involve some sticker shock. Also required is a keen understanding that the ground beneath whatever gets built \u2014 a road, port, school, town or mine \u2014 may melt. Instead of the sort of bedrock structural engineers favour when sinking construction pilings, the Arctic, particularly the western portion, is filled with permafrost, or permanently frozen ground that is now in the process of permanently unfreezing at an alarming rate.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n
Advertisement 8<\/p>\n
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cWhen we talk about building in the Arctic, foundation designers have to start to consider how much overdesigning we are going to have to do to anticipate what a building will need in 30 years\u2019 time,\u201d Chris Burn, a physical geography professor at Carleton University, said. \u201cIf we build things to today\u2019s code, all is going to be well, it\u2019ll be just fine, but then in 15 years there\u2019s going to be a problem.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Brendan Bell, right, is chief executive of West Kitikmeot Resources Corp., an Inuit-owned company proposing to build a road and deepwater ocean port in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Handout<\/span> \/West Kitikmeot Resources Corp.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nBurn is a Brit and attended a series of lectures on permafrost as an undergraduate in the 1970s. Halfway through the second one, he knew what he wanted to do with his life, and the place to do it, at least for an English-speaking scholar, was the Canadian Arctic.<\/p>\nHe went on to become president of the International Permafrost Association for a time, and he is somewhat of a legend in Canadian Arctic permafrost research circles. He is also the guy that northerners call to consult with on building projects, including the Inuvik-Tuktoyaktuk Highway.<\/p>\nThe 138-kilometre, two-lane, all-weather gravel road tying the community of Tuktoyaktuk on the Arctic coast to the rest of Canada\u2019s road network opened in 2017. The price tag was $300 million and its completion allowed Canada, 150 years post-Confederation, to claim it was connected by road from coast to coast to coast.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 9<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBut beneath the proudly Canadian optics of tethering the country north to south was the chilling reality of building infrastructure in the permafrost zone.<\/p>\n\u201cThe ice in the ground is what holds the permafrost together,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nThink of the ice as the glue. A new, hypothetical four-storey building built to serve an equally new, hypothetical Arctic outpost would typically be built on pilings. Current engineering wisdom allows that once pilings are sunk in the permafrost, a building is effectively frozen in place. But as the permafrost thaws, and the glue unsticks, the building could be on the move: sinking, shifting or toppling over altogether.<\/p>\nRoads are even more dicey. Buildings have small footprints, but future Arctic roads will traverse multiple building environments and the amount of ice-glue in the ground will vary depending on the location, Burn said.<\/p>\nIn a landscape that is humming with, say, mining projects, the ice-glue will need to support the weight of industrial-scale trucks. As long as the glue sticks, all will be well, but should the glue lose its stickiness due to temperature increases, the road would be in big trouble and need substantial repairs while those who travel upon it could be put at grave risk.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 10<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\nWe’re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre<\/p>\nChris Burn, geography professor, Carleton University<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cKnowing the quantity of ice underneath the road is a really critical part of the information needed to design the road because the designers have to decide how they\u2019re going to keep that ice frozen,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nOne bright idea has been to refrigerate the permafrost. The Shakwak corridor is a critical stretch of the Alaska Highway connecting the state, via Yukon and British Columbia, to the lower 48 states. Canada and the U.S. have long co-operated in maintaining the highway, and a big chunk of that job in recent decades has been figuring out what to do about the thawing permafrost causing gargantuan potholes, bumps and cracks, as well as warping guardrails at the highway\u2019s edge.<\/p>\nThe community of Beaver Creek in western Yukon piloted a project involving thermosyphons: picture a white pipe stuck in the ground next to the road that is designed to vent heat from beneath the road while carrying cold back into the permafrost. The gadgets are a relatively low-tech way of addressing thawing permafrost, but low-tech should not be confused with inexpensive.<\/p>\n\u201cBeaver Creek\u2019s thermosyphon project cost $4 million and that was for 400 metres of road, which would work out to about $8 million per kilometre,\u201d Burn said. \u201cWe\u2019re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre. We don\u2019t do that in Canada.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 11<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nOn top of that, road maintenance in areas of thawing permafrost is already six times pricier than maintaining roads in areas where the permafrost \u201cis stable or absent,\u201d according to the Yukon government. Burn said more thawing permafrost is in the cards, so more Arctic architects, road designers, maintenance types and accountants will presumably be puzzling over what to do about it and how to budget for it.<\/p>\nTaken as a whole, a great, imagined Arctic infrastructure build-out might seem a bit daunting, but Canada has not always been afraid of dreaming big. Consider John Diefenbaker\u2019s Northern Vision.<\/p>\nThe country\u2019s so-called Prairie populist prime minister uncorked a barnburner of a speech before a packed house at the Winnipeg Civic Auditorium during a 1958 election campaign that his Conservatives went on to win in a blowout. Diefenbaker, whose oratorical chops were substantial, was never finer nor more fiery that day as he spoke of a \u201cnew\u201d Canada infused with a sense of national purpose and destiny.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, delivers remarks at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa in 2023. Obed said, while the Inuit are the first Canadians, they view themselves as Canadians first.<\/span> Photo by Spencer Colby<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cHow many of you here knew the pioneers in Western Canada?\u201d he said. \u201cI saw the early days here, here in Winnipeg in 1909, when the vast movement was taking place into the Western plains \u2014\u00a0they had imagination. There is a new imagination now. The Arctic.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 12<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThis new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\nIt should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\nIn reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cWhen we talk about building in the Arctic, foundation designers have to start to consider how much overdesigning we are going to have to do to anticipate what a building will need in 30 years\u2019 time,\u201d Chris Burn, a physical geography professor at Carleton University, said. \u201cIf we build things to today\u2019s code, all is going to be well, it\u2019ll be just fine, but then in 15 years there\u2019s going to be a problem.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Brendan Bell, right, is chief executive of West Kitikmeot Resources Corp., an Inuit-owned company proposing to build a road and deepwater ocean port in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Handout<\/span> \/West Kitikmeot Resources Corp.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nBurn is a Brit and attended a series of lectures on permafrost as an undergraduate in the 1970s. Halfway through the second one, he knew what he wanted to do with his life, and the place to do it, at least for an English-speaking scholar, was the Canadian Arctic.<\/p>\nHe went on to become president of the International Permafrost Association for a time, and he is somewhat of a legend in Canadian Arctic permafrost research circles. He is also the guy that northerners call to consult with on building projects, including the Inuvik-Tuktoyaktuk Highway.<\/p>\nThe 138-kilometre, two-lane, all-weather gravel road tying the community of Tuktoyaktuk on the Arctic coast to the rest of Canada\u2019s road network opened in 2017. The price tag was $300 million and its completion allowed Canada, 150 years post-Confederation, to claim it was connected by road from coast to coast to coast.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 9<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBut beneath the proudly Canadian optics of tethering the country north to south was the chilling reality of building infrastructure in the permafrost zone.<\/p>\n\u201cThe ice in the ground is what holds the permafrost together,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nThink of the ice as the glue. A new, hypothetical four-storey building built to serve an equally new, hypothetical Arctic outpost would typically be built on pilings. Current engineering wisdom allows that once pilings are sunk in the permafrost, a building is effectively frozen in place. But as the permafrost thaws, and the glue unsticks, the building could be on the move: sinking, shifting or toppling over altogether.<\/p>\nRoads are even more dicey. Buildings have small footprints, but future Arctic roads will traverse multiple building environments and the amount of ice-glue in the ground will vary depending on the location, Burn said.<\/p>\nIn a landscape that is humming with, say, mining projects, the ice-glue will need to support the weight of industrial-scale trucks. As long as the glue sticks, all will be well, but should the glue lose its stickiness due to temperature increases, the road would be in big trouble and need substantial repairs while those who travel upon it could be put at grave risk.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 10<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\nWe’re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre<\/p>\nChris Burn, geography professor, Carleton University<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cKnowing the quantity of ice underneath the road is a really critical part of the information needed to design the road because the designers have to decide how they\u2019re going to keep that ice frozen,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nOne bright idea has been to refrigerate the permafrost. The Shakwak corridor is a critical stretch of the Alaska Highway connecting the state, via Yukon and British Columbia, to the lower 48 states. Canada and the U.S. have long co-operated in maintaining the highway, and a big chunk of that job in recent decades has been figuring out what to do about the thawing permafrost causing gargantuan potholes, bumps and cracks, as well as warping guardrails at the highway\u2019s edge.<\/p>\nThe community of Beaver Creek in western Yukon piloted a project involving thermosyphons: picture a white pipe stuck in the ground next to the road that is designed to vent heat from beneath the road while carrying cold back into the permafrost. The gadgets are a relatively low-tech way of addressing thawing permafrost, but low-tech should not be confused with inexpensive.<\/p>\n\u201cBeaver Creek\u2019s thermosyphon project cost $4 million and that was for 400 metres of road, which would work out to about $8 million per kilometre,\u201d Burn said. \u201cWe\u2019re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre. We don\u2019t do that in Canada.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 11<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nOn top of that, road maintenance in areas of thawing permafrost is already six times pricier than maintaining roads in areas where the permafrost \u201cis stable or absent,\u201d according to the Yukon government. Burn said more thawing permafrost is in the cards, so more Arctic architects, road designers, maintenance types and accountants will presumably be puzzling over what to do about it and how to budget for it.<\/p>\nTaken as a whole, a great, imagined Arctic infrastructure build-out might seem a bit daunting, but Canada has not always been afraid of dreaming big. Consider John Diefenbaker\u2019s Northern Vision.<\/p>\nThe country\u2019s so-called Prairie populist prime minister uncorked a barnburner of a speech before a packed house at the Winnipeg Civic Auditorium during a 1958 election campaign that his Conservatives went on to win in a blowout. Diefenbaker, whose oratorical chops were substantial, was never finer nor more fiery that day as he spoke of a \u201cnew\u201d Canada infused with a sense of national purpose and destiny.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, delivers remarks at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa in 2023. Obed said, while the Inuit are the first Canadians, they view themselves as Canadians first.<\/span> Photo by Spencer Colby<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cHow many of you here knew the pioneers in Western Canada?\u201d he said. \u201cI saw the early days here, here in Winnipeg in 1909, when the vast movement was taking place into the Western plains \u2014\u00a0they had imagination. There is a new imagination now. The Arctic.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 12<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThis new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\nIt should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\nIn reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Burn is a Brit and attended a series of lectures on permafrost as an undergraduate in the 1970s. Halfway through the second one, he knew what he wanted to do with his life, and the place to do it, at least for an English-speaking scholar, was the Canadian Arctic.<\/p>\n
He went on to become president of the International Permafrost Association for a time, and he is somewhat of a legend in Canadian Arctic permafrost research circles. He is also the guy that northerners call to consult with on building projects, including the Inuvik-Tuktoyaktuk Highway.<\/p>\n
The 138-kilometre, two-lane, all-weather gravel road tying the community of Tuktoyaktuk on the Arctic coast to the rest of Canada\u2019s road network opened in 2017. The price tag was $300 million and its completion allowed Canada, 150 years post-Confederation, to claim it was connected by road from coast to coast to coast.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n
Advertisement 9<\/p>\n
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nBut beneath the proudly Canadian optics of tethering the country north to south was the chilling reality of building infrastructure in the permafrost zone.<\/p>\n\u201cThe ice in the ground is what holds the permafrost together,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nThink of the ice as the glue. A new, hypothetical four-storey building built to serve an equally new, hypothetical Arctic outpost would typically be built on pilings. Current engineering wisdom allows that once pilings are sunk in the permafrost, a building is effectively frozen in place. But as the permafrost thaws, and the glue unsticks, the building could be on the move: sinking, shifting or toppling over altogether.<\/p>\nRoads are even more dicey. Buildings have small footprints, but future Arctic roads will traverse multiple building environments and the amount of ice-glue in the ground will vary depending on the location, Burn said.<\/p>\nIn a landscape that is humming with, say, mining projects, the ice-glue will need to support the weight of industrial-scale trucks. As long as the glue sticks, all will be well, but should the glue lose its stickiness due to temperature increases, the road would be in big trouble and need substantial repairs while those who travel upon it could be put at grave risk.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 10<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\nWe’re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre<\/p>\nChris Burn, geography professor, Carleton University<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cKnowing the quantity of ice underneath the road is a really critical part of the information needed to design the road because the designers have to decide how they\u2019re going to keep that ice frozen,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nOne bright idea has been to refrigerate the permafrost. The Shakwak corridor is a critical stretch of the Alaska Highway connecting the state, via Yukon and British Columbia, to the lower 48 states. Canada and the U.S. have long co-operated in maintaining the highway, and a big chunk of that job in recent decades has been figuring out what to do about the thawing permafrost causing gargantuan potholes, bumps and cracks, as well as warping guardrails at the highway\u2019s edge.<\/p>\nThe community of Beaver Creek in western Yukon piloted a project involving thermosyphons: picture a white pipe stuck in the ground next to the road that is designed to vent heat from beneath the road while carrying cold back into the permafrost. The gadgets are a relatively low-tech way of addressing thawing permafrost, but low-tech should not be confused with inexpensive.<\/p>\n\u201cBeaver Creek\u2019s thermosyphon project cost $4 million and that was for 400 metres of road, which would work out to about $8 million per kilometre,\u201d Burn said. \u201cWe\u2019re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre. We don\u2019t do that in Canada.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 11<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nOn top of that, road maintenance in areas of thawing permafrost is already six times pricier than maintaining roads in areas where the permafrost \u201cis stable or absent,\u201d according to the Yukon government. Burn said more thawing permafrost is in the cards, so more Arctic architects, road designers, maintenance types and accountants will presumably be puzzling over what to do about it and how to budget for it.<\/p>\nTaken as a whole, a great, imagined Arctic infrastructure build-out might seem a bit daunting, but Canada has not always been afraid of dreaming big. Consider John Diefenbaker\u2019s Northern Vision.<\/p>\nThe country\u2019s so-called Prairie populist prime minister uncorked a barnburner of a speech before a packed house at the Winnipeg Civic Auditorium during a 1958 election campaign that his Conservatives went on to win in a blowout. Diefenbaker, whose oratorical chops were substantial, was never finer nor more fiery that day as he spoke of a \u201cnew\u201d Canada infused with a sense of national purpose and destiny.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, delivers remarks at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa in 2023. Obed said, while the Inuit are the first Canadians, they view themselves as Canadians first.<\/span> Photo by Spencer Colby<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cHow many of you here knew the pioneers in Western Canada?\u201d he said. \u201cI saw the early days here, here in Winnipeg in 1909, when the vast movement was taking place into the Western plains \u2014\u00a0they had imagination. There is a new imagination now. The Arctic.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 12<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThis new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\nIt should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\nIn reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But beneath the proudly Canadian optics of tethering the country north to south was the chilling reality of building infrastructure in the permafrost zone.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe ice in the ground is what holds the permafrost together,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\n
Think of the ice as the glue. A new, hypothetical four-storey building built to serve an equally new, hypothetical Arctic outpost would typically be built on pilings. Current engineering wisdom allows that once pilings are sunk in the permafrost, a building is effectively frozen in place. But as the permafrost thaws, and the glue unsticks, the building could be on the move: sinking, shifting or toppling over altogether.<\/p>\n
Roads are even more dicey. Buildings have small footprints, but future Arctic roads will traverse multiple building environments and the amount of ice-glue in the ground will vary depending on the location, Burn said.<\/p>\n
In a landscape that is humming with, say, mining projects, the ice-glue will need to support the weight of industrial-scale trucks. As long as the glue sticks, all will be well, but should the glue lose its stickiness due to temperature increases, the road would be in big trouble and need substantial repairs while those who travel upon it could be put at grave risk.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n
Advertisement 10<\/p>\n
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\nWe’re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre<\/p>\nChris Burn, geography professor, Carleton University<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cKnowing the quantity of ice underneath the road is a really critical part of the information needed to design the road because the designers have to decide how they\u2019re going to keep that ice frozen,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nOne bright idea has been to refrigerate the permafrost. The Shakwak corridor is a critical stretch of the Alaska Highway connecting the state, via Yukon and British Columbia, to the lower 48 states. Canada and the U.S. have long co-operated in maintaining the highway, and a big chunk of that job in recent decades has been figuring out what to do about the thawing permafrost causing gargantuan potholes, bumps and cracks, as well as warping guardrails at the highway\u2019s edge.<\/p>\nThe community of Beaver Creek in western Yukon piloted a project involving thermosyphons: picture a white pipe stuck in the ground next to the road that is designed to vent heat from beneath the road while carrying cold back into the permafrost. The gadgets are a relatively low-tech way of addressing thawing permafrost, but low-tech should not be confused with inexpensive.<\/p>\n\u201cBeaver Creek\u2019s thermosyphon project cost $4 million and that was for 400 metres of road, which would work out to about $8 million per kilometre,\u201d Burn said. \u201cWe\u2019re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre. We don\u2019t do that in Canada.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 11<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nOn top of that, road maintenance in areas of thawing permafrost is already six times pricier than maintaining roads in areas where the permafrost \u201cis stable or absent,\u201d according to the Yukon government. Burn said more thawing permafrost is in the cards, so more Arctic architects, road designers, maintenance types and accountants will presumably be puzzling over what to do about it and how to budget for it.<\/p>\nTaken as a whole, a great, imagined Arctic infrastructure build-out might seem a bit daunting, but Canada has not always been afraid of dreaming big. Consider John Diefenbaker\u2019s Northern Vision.<\/p>\nThe country\u2019s so-called Prairie populist prime minister uncorked a barnburner of a speech before a packed house at the Winnipeg Civic Auditorium during a 1958 election campaign that his Conservatives went on to win in a blowout. Diefenbaker, whose oratorical chops were substantial, was never finer nor more fiery that day as he spoke of a \u201cnew\u201d Canada infused with a sense of national purpose and destiny.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, delivers remarks at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa in 2023. Obed said, while the Inuit are the first Canadians, they view themselves as Canadians first.<\/span> Photo by Spencer Colby<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cHow many of you here knew the pioneers in Western Canada?\u201d he said. \u201cI saw the early days here, here in Winnipeg in 1909, when the vast movement was taking place into the Western plains \u2014\u00a0they had imagination. There is a new imagination now. The Arctic.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 12<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThis new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\nIt should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\nIn reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nWe’re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre<\/p>\nChris Burn, geography professor, Carleton University<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\u201cKnowing the quantity of ice underneath the road is a really critical part of the information needed to design the road because the designers have to decide how they\u2019re going to keep that ice frozen,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\nOne bright idea has been to refrigerate the permafrost. The Shakwak corridor is a critical stretch of the Alaska Highway connecting the state, via Yukon and British Columbia, to the lower 48 states. Canada and the U.S. have long co-operated in maintaining the highway, and a big chunk of that job in recent decades has been figuring out what to do about the thawing permafrost causing gargantuan potholes, bumps and cracks, as well as warping guardrails at the highway\u2019s edge.<\/p>\nThe community of Beaver Creek in western Yukon piloted a project involving thermosyphons: picture a white pipe stuck in the ground next to the road that is designed to vent heat from beneath the road while carrying cold back into the permafrost. The gadgets are a relatively low-tech way of addressing thawing permafrost, but low-tech should not be confused with inexpensive.<\/p>\n\u201cBeaver Creek\u2019s thermosyphon project cost $4 million and that was for 400 metres of road, which would work out to about $8 million per kilometre,\u201d Burn said. \u201cWe\u2019re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre. We don\u2019t do that in Canada.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 11<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nOn top of that, road maintenance in areas of thawing permafrost is already six times pricier than maintaining roads in areas where the permafrost \u201cis stable or absent,\u201d according to the Yukon government. Burn said more thawing permafrost is in the cards, so more Arctic architects, road designers, maintenance types and accountants will presumably be puzzling over what to do about it and how to budget for it.<\/p>\nTaken as a whole, a great, imagined Arctic infrastructure build-out might seem a bit daunting, but Canada has not always been afraid of dreaming big. Consider John Diefenbaker\u2019s Northern Vision.<\/p>\nThe country\u2019s so-called Prairie populist prime minister uncorked a barnburner of a speech before a packed house at the Winnipeg Civic Auditorium during a 1958 election campaign that his Conservatives went on to win in a blowout. Diefenbaker, whose oratorical chops were substantial, was never finer nor more fiery that day as he spoke of a \u201cnew\u201d Canada infused with a sense of national purpose and destiny.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, delivers remarks at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa in 2023. Obed said, while the Inuit are the first Canadians, they view themselves as Canadians first.<\/span> Photo by Spencer Colby<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cHow many of you here knew the pioneers in Western Canada?\u201d he said. \u201cI saw the early days here, here in Winnipeg in 1909, when the vast movement was taking place into the Western plains \u2014\u00a0they had imagination. There is a new imagination now. The Arctic.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 12<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThis new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\nIt should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\nIn reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
We’re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre<\/p>\n
Chris Burn, geography professor, Carleton University<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\u201cKnowing the quantity of ice underneath the road is a really critical part of the information needed to design the road because the designers have to decide how they\u2019re going to keep that ice frozen,\u201d Burn said.<\/p>\n
One bright idea has been to refrigerate the permafrost. The Shakwak corridor is a critical stretch of the Alaska Highway connecting the state, via Yukon and British Columbia, to the lower 48 states. Canada and the U.S. have long co-operated in maintaining the highway, and a big chunk of that job in recent decades has been figuring out what to do about the thawing permafrost causing gargantuan potholes, bumps and cracks, as well as warping guardrails at the highway\u2019s edge.<\/p>\n
The community of Beaver Creek in western Yukon piloted a project involving thermosyphons: picture a white pipe stuck in the ground next to the road that is designed to vent heat from beneath the road while carrying cold back into the permafrost. The gadgets are a relatively low-tech way of addressing thawing permafrost, but low-tech should not be confused with inexpensive.<\/p>\n
\u201cBeaver Creek\u2019s thermosyphon project cost $4 million and that was for 400 metres of road, which would work out to about $8 million per kilometre,\u201d Burn said. \u201cWe\u2019re not going to be building roads for $8 million a kilometre. We don\u2019t do that in Canada.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n
Advertisement 11<\/p>\n
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nOn top of that, road maintenance in areas of thawing permafrost is already six times pricier than maintaining roads in areas where the permafrost \u201cis stable or absent,\u201d according to the Yukon government. Burn said more thawing permafrost is in the cards, so more Arctic architects, road designers, maintenance types and accountants will presumably be puzzling over what to do about it and how to budget for it.<\/p>\nTaken as a whole, a great, imagined Arctic infrastructure build-out might seem a bit daunting, but Canada has not always been afraid of dreaming big. Consider John Diefenbaker\u2019s Northern Vision.<\/p>\nThe country\u2019s so-called Prairie populist prime minister uncorked a barnburner of a speech before a packed house at the Winnipeg Civic Auditorium during a 1958 election campaign that his Conservatives went on to win in a blowout. Diefenbaker, whose oratorical chops were substantial, was never finer nor more fiery that day as he spoke of a \u201cnew\u201d Canada infused with a sense of national purpose and destiny.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, delivers remarks at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa in 2023. Obed said, while the Inuit are the first Canadians, they view themselves as Canadians first.<\/span> Photo by Spencer Colby<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cHow many of you here knew the pioneers in Western Canada?\u201d he said. \u201cI saw the early days here, here in Winnipeg in 1909, when the vast movement was taking place into the Western plains \u2014\u00a0they had imagination. There is a new imagination now. The Arctic.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 12<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThis new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\nIt should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\nIn reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
On top of that, road maintenance in areas of thawing permafrost is already six times pricier than maintaining roads in areas where the permafrost \u201cis stable or absent,\u201d according to the Yukon government. Burn said more thawing permafrost is in the cards, so more Arctic architects, road designers, maintenance types and accountants will presumably be puzzling over what to do about it and how to budget for it.<\/p>\n
Taken as a whole, a great, imagined Arctic infrastructure build-out might seem a bit daunting, but Canada has not always been afraid of dreaming big. Consider John Diefenbaker\u2019s Northern Vision.<\/p>\n
The country\u2019s so-called Prairie populist prime minister uncorked a barnburner of a speech before a packed house at the Winnipeg Civic Auditorium during a 1958 election campaign that his Conservatives went on to win in a blowout. Diefenbaker, whose oratorical chops were substantial, was never finer nor more fiery that day as he spoke of a \u201cnew\u201d Canada infused with a sense of national purpose and destiny.<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, delivers remarks at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa in 2023. Obed said, while the Inuit are the first Canadians, they view themselves as Canadians first.<\/span> Photo by Spencer Colby<\/span> \/The Canadian Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cHow many of you here knew the pioneers in Western Canada?\u201d he said. \u201cI saw the early days here, here in Winnipeg in 1909, when the vast movement was taking place into the Western plains \u2014\u00a0they had imagination. There is a new imagination now. The Arctic.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 12<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThis new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\nIt should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\nIn reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cHow many of you here knew the pioneers in Western Canada?\u201d he said. \u201cI saw the early days here, here in Winnipeg in 1909, when the vast movement was taking place into the Western plains \u2014\u00a0they had imagination. There is a new imagination now. The Arctic.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n
Advertisement 12<\/p>\n
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nThis new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\nIt should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\nIn reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This new Canada would be a \u201cCanada of the North,\u201d connected by a network of northern roads, lit up by power grids, airports, mines and hydroelectric projects, you name it, all built to tame \u2014 and exploit \u2014 the last great Canadian frontier while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and safeguarding the country\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d from you know who to the south.<\/p>\n
It should be noted that the Inuit did not view their home as some wild, untamed frontier, nor were they consulted about Diefenbaker\u2019s grand plan, an oversight that would have been far more egregious had the North he envisioned been built.<\/p>\n
In reality, after a short-lived burst of activity, which produced about 100-kilometres worth of road and a railway connecting a lead and zinc mine in the Northwest Territories to a railway junction in northern Alberta that today serves as a recreation trail, Diefenbaker\u2019s vision succumbed to ballooning costs and a chorus of barbs from its critics, including the Liberals, whose quip that he was building roads from \u201cigloo to igloo\u201d resonated with the less enlightened Canada of the age.<\/p>\n
\nI don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\nNatan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nSix-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 13<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
I don’t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada<\/p>\n
Natan Obed, president, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Six-plus decades later, the Arctic has re-emerged as a national priority, leaving the Inuit to wonder what took us so long.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n
Advertisement 13<\/p>\n
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\nHe said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\nObed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\nBack then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 14<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cI don\u2019t think any of us have ever shied away, on the Inuit side, from talking about what it is going to take to bring the Inuit into Canada,\u201d Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said. \u201cThe costs involved are going to be big.\u201d<\/p>\n
He said there are some basic facts about Inuit southern Canadians need to be aware of. First and foremost, while the Inuit are the \u201cfirst Canadians,\u201d they view themselves as \u201cCanadians first.\u201d In short, they are just as patriotic, if not more so, than most.<\/p>\n
Obed played college hockey in the U.S. He recently bought a new pair of blades for an unprintable sum for his weekly pick-up skates in Ottawa, and he said watching Canada beat the Soviet Union in the final of the 1987 Canada Cup was among the most defining memories of his childhood.<\/p>\n
Back then, he was in North West River, a small, predominantly Inuit town in Labrador, and had never been to an NHL game, let alone to Ontario, but cheering for his country connected him to the country beyond his front door, he said. There is a deep and affectionate bond for Canada in the North, and it is one that southern Canadians can at times appear oblivious to, assuming they even bother to think about the Arctic in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n
Advertisement 14<\/p>\n
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\nWhat the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\nSimply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\nThe Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
What the Arctic is not, Obed said, is an incomprehensibly vast, unmanageable space. It is home to 51 Inuit communities and its residents figured out how to live there eons ago. They view it not as a northern \u201cwasteland,\u201d but as a homeland with \u201cvast potential\u201d that they are keen to develop.<\/p>\n
Simply put, the locals want in on the resource development action, and development begins with being able to access the resources, which requires building infrastructure of the kind Diefenbaker was talking about back in the 1950s.<\/p>\n
The Inuit already have modern treaties and a constructive framework in place for resource development with the Canadian government. The bureaucratic heavy lifting has been done. What has been missing, Obed said, is the collective will to roll up our sleeves and get at it.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\nArticle content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Article content<\/p>\n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>Aaju Peter, a 65-year-old, Greenland-born Inuit activist, lawyer, artisan and language preservation teacher in Iqaluit, said there is not much in the way of basic services designed to enhance the scaling-up of a small business, or any business in the Arctic.<\/span> Photo by Michelle Valberg<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\nAdvertisement 15<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cAs Inuit, we are always invoking the creation of the country, and the imagination of the founders had for building east-west connections,\u201d he said. \u201cAt some point, the railway that was built across the country would have been considered a lot like what we\u2019re proposing with building infrastructure that connects north and south. Yes, it is going to cost a lot of money, but it is a nation-building exercise, and if Canada seriously talks about being an Arctic nation state, it\u2019s time that Canada really understands what that means and responds to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n
Advertisement 15<\/p>\n